Joe Rogan/Spotify Take Down Attempt

Gullible people are the ones who still take that shyll seriously.

If A Son of Liberty is your enemy, then so am I.

Typical controlled opposition behavior from you and your little friend.
You can't dispute the facts so you attack the messenger.
 
Pretty much. 99% of his posts can be summarized as "elites are bad" where "elite" is vaguely defined as anyone even moderately rich or famous.

I have outlined a dozen times or more the categories I claim to be protected elites that are above the law. I have not been vague about that and you have not been vague about not liking me calling them out.

Law enforcement all levels and the Judiciary
Politicians
News Media
Hollywood Elites
Billionaire Elites


That is not even worthy of me re-quoting what you wrote. It says something about you that what they were doing to kids and adults you think is funny.

Why do you think we do not hear the names and faces of most of those victims because there are people like you that try to humiliate and mock people that have suffered greatly at their hands.

This is a common theme here with you and several posters. Freak out when someone calls out the Billionaire elites for their actions, mock the victims or anyone that calls the elites out. Then spend all your time talking about people and topics in the news cycle that don't matter and people whom have no power over you as if they do have the power.

Maybe you have more money then we thought here. j/k
 
Last edited:
I have outlined a dozen times or more who I claim to be protected elites that are above the law. I have not been vague about that all and you have not been vague about not liking me calling them out.

Law enforcement all levels and the Judiciary
Politicians
News Media
Hollywood Elites
Billionaire Elites



That is not even worthy of me re-quoting what you wrote. It says something about you that they were doing to kids and adults you think is funny.

Why do you think we do not hear the names and faces of most of those victims because there are people like you that try to humiliate and mock people have suffered greatly at their hands.

This is a common theme here with you and several posters. Freak out when someone calls out the Billionaire elites for their actions, mock the victims or anyone that calls the elites out. Then spend all your time talking about people and topics in the news cycle that don't matter and people whom have no power over you as if they did have the power.

Maybe you have more money then we thought here. j/k

Pretty much predicted your entire response. That's how predictable you are. In any case, I'll let you get back to your personal war with the elites... I've got better things to do. This was fun. We should do it again some time.
 
Name one person current or past that provides a place for people with controversial content to explain their positions uninterrupted while be challenged with logic. Alex Jones never let his guests speak. Cable and Network cut you off as soon as they think you are thinking of saying something they don't want you saying, Rush's opinion was always the gold standard to himself and his audience. He wouldn't let people talk for an hour about something he might not agree with. If Rogan is controlled opposition, I say we need more of it.
 
Because I point out that Rogan is probably controlled opposition?

No. You're an enemy because "you" or however many of "you" there are, spent years here racking up 3 posts per hour on average shilling for Trump.

Black Rifle Coffee is an enemy, Moderna is an enemy, Spotify is probably an enemy, Rogan was never one of us and can't be trusted, and you look like controlled opposition now too.

lol ooookay... here we go...

"One of us". lmao
 
Last edited:
Pretty much predicted your entire response. That's how predictable you are. In any case, I'll let you get back to your personal war with the elites... I've got better things to do. This was fun. We should do it again some time.

As well I will let you get back for shilling for the establishment and playing as if useful idiots on Twitter that do not matter have power over us instead of those that do.
 
No. You're an enemy because "you" or however many of "you" there are, spent years here racking up 3 posts per hour on average shilling for Trump.

lol ooookay... here we go...

"One of us". lmao

Anyone that is trying to shut down free speech by using character assassination tactics is the enemy. That is you.

He is right, you clearly are not one of us, meaning those that support the free speech mission of this site. You are one of them, a defender of the establishment and are just as bad as those that are trying to shut down Rogan's free speech whether one agrees or disagrees with his free speech.

In a free speech forum those that support the mission do not continually character assassinate those with differing opinions in an extreme attempt to get people to stop posting here. Your whole game and a few others is to defend the elites, their news cycle narrative and their anointed gods. To personally attack those with differing opinions.

It is no wonder why this forum has so few people these days and has become an echo chamber. Good job you and your asshole clique making that happen.

To make sure the trolls don't bury the facts:

Don’t trust Rogan:

Black Rifle Coffee Increases Joe Rogan Ad Budget
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/black-...gan-ad-budget/


Black Rifle Coffee is an enemy.

Dr. Malone Exposes ‘Top Owner of Spotify Also Top Owner of Moderna’

https://www.infowars.com/posts/this-...er-of-moderna/
 
Because I point out that Rogan is probably controlled opposition?

Black Rifle Coffee is an enemy, Moderna is an enemy, Spotify is probably an enemy, Rogan was never one of us and can't be trusted, and you look like controlled opposition now too.

YOU were never one of "us". You came here to try to pull Ron Paul supporters over to Trump. That was the whole purpose of you coming to this forum. Pepperidge Farm Remembers...

As for Rogan, we're not looking for someone who can be "trusted" to tell "us" only what our narrative prefers. I understand that's what YOU want, but don't group "us" in with that. We'll be more than happy to listen to a range of voices that are trying to reconcile some version of truth in this empire of lies.
 
YOU were never one of "us". You came here to try to pull Ron Paul supporters over to Trump. That was the whole purpose of you coming to this forum. Pepperidge Farm Remembers...

As for Rogan, we're not looking for someone who can be "trusted" to tell "us" only what our narrative prefers. I understand that's what YOU want, but don't group "us" in with that. We'll be more than happy to listen to a range of voices that are trying to reconcile some version of truth in this empire of lies.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to CaptUSA again.

//
 
Anyone that is trying to shut down free speech by using character assassination tactics is the enemy. That is you.

He is right, you clearly are not one of us, meaning those that support the free speech mission of this site. You are one of them, a defender of the establishment and are just as bad as those that are trying to shut down Rogan's free speech whether one agrees or disagrees with his free speech.

In a free speech forum those that support the mission do not continually character assassinate those with differing opinions in an extreme attempt to get people to stop posting here. Your whole game and a few others is to defend the elites, their news cycle narrative and their anointed gods. To personally attack those with differing opinions.

It is no wonder why this forum has so few people these days and has become an echo chamber. Good job you and your $#@! clique making that happen.

This is rich.

I'm trying to shut down your ability to speak freely? You're adorable. I'm a rando on the internet, I literally have no power - or desire - to keep you from speaking. All I've done is point out that your schtick is nonsense. I have that right. You have the right to ignore me, or lash out like a b!tch, which is apparently the option you went with. I don't really care either way.

Oh, or there's another option, actually... you could take the criticism and actually back up all of the wild claims you make. But we all know that's not going to happen, don't we?
 
YOU were never one of "us".

You have a mouse in your pocket? :)

I don't quite get the hate for SS around here. I personally consider him an ally and if the world had more of him and fewer of the leftists, the world would be a much better place.
 
This is rich.

I'm trying to shut down your ability to speak freely? You're adorable. I'm a rando on the internet, I literally have no power - or desire - to keep you from speaking. All I've done is point out that your schtick is nonsense. I have that right. You have the right to ignore me, or lash out like a b!tch, which is apparently the option you went with. I don't really care either way.

You are so full of shit and such a phony. You know exactly what you are doing here with your character assassination tactics. I know your game and have been warned about you for years here. I have let your shit slide because I knew you were baiting me. Well after years of letting it slide I was in the mood to call you out on your bullshit. Fuck off you piece of garbage.

Oh, or there's another option, actually... you could take the criticism and actually back up all of the wild claims you make. But we all know that's not going to happen, don't we?

You played the personal attack against another forum member here in the past that had to be vague due to their work. You are trying to expose peoples identities here. Not taking your bait asshole. Fuck off.
 
You have a mouse in your pocket? :)

I don't quite get the hate for SS around here. I personally consider him an ally and if the world had more of him and fewer of the leftists, the world would be a much better place.
Why must people hate those they disagree with? I disagree with loved ones all the time. I guess it is because they don't want the other person to have an opinion that differs from theirs. People that don't want to control other peoples opinions don't hate on them for not sharing their views.
 
You are so full of $#@! and such a phony. You know exactly what you are doing here with your character assassination tactics. I know your game and have been warned about you for years here. I have let your $#@! slide because I knew you were baiting me. Well after years of letting it slide I was in the mood to call you out on your bull$#@!. $#@! off you piece of garbage.



You played the personal attack against another forum member here in the past that had to be vague due to their work. You are trying to expose peoples identities here. Not taking your bait $#@!. $#@! off.

You're a paranoid lunatic. Seek help, seriously.
 
You have a mouse in your pocket? :)

I don't quite get the hate for SS around here. I personally consider him an ally and if the world had more of him and fewer of the leftists, the world would be a much better place.

I personally don't "hate" the guy. I don't hate anyone, least of all faceless folks on the internet.

My problem with him was, especially in 2015/2016, while Rand was still in the race, he was posting on average somewhere around 3 times an hour, I think, over 24 hours, and he was pushing Trump HARD. I think it's decent odds that, at least back then, there was more than one person posting under that profile - the volume was just incredible to assume that it was the work of just one person. Maybe... But more importantly, as CaptUSA pointed out, he was here trying to turn Paul supporters over to Trump. He showed up right after Trump announced, if I recall correctly.

The other thing about him is, when people disagree with him, he instantly calls them "controlled opposition". It's a tired tactic.
 
I personally don't "hate" the guy. I don't hate anyone, least of all faceless folks on the internet.

My problem with him was, especially in 2015/2016, while Rand was still in the race, he was posting on average somewhere around 3 times an hour, I think, over 24 hours, and he was pushing Trump HARD. I think it's decent odds that, at least back then, there was more than one person posting under that profile - the volume was just incredible to assume that it was the work of just one person. Maybe... But more importantly, as CaptUSA pointed out, he was here trying to turn Paul supporters over to Trump. He showed up right after Trump announced, if I recall correctly.

The other thing about him is, when people disagree with him, he instantly calls them "controlled opposition". It's a tired tactic.
I think he is just one person that spends a lot of his time online. I think he has plenty to offer that is beneficial.
 
Second ex-CNN staffer under investigation for alleged crimes involving minors: report
https://nypost.com/2021/12/30/secon...tigation-for-alleged-crimes-involving-minors/

[...]

Saleeby’s case comes on the heels of another CNN producer who is embroiled in a criminal investigation.

Earlier this month, John Griffin, 44, was indicted by a federal grand jury in Vermont for attempting to “induce minors to engage in unlawful sexual activity,” according to the Justice Department.

He allegedly attempted to lure at least four girls — ages 16, 14, 13 and 9 — to his Vermont ski house for “training sessions” on such things as “spanking” and “c–k worship,” reportedly saying a “woman is a woman regardless of her age,” according to court documents.

Griffin allegedly “advised” a mother of 9- and 13-year-old daughters that she needed to ensure her girls were “trained properly,” the Justice Department said. He then allegedly gave the mother $3,000 so she and the 9-year-old could fly from their home in Nevada to Boston in July 2020.

[...]

Charming...
 
Back
Top