Jeffrey Tucker: Has Donald Trump Unleashed the Neo-Nazis?

[William R]

Tucker sounds like hysterical Neocon David Frum This is really bad

http://www.frumforum.com/ron-pauls-base/

 

[erowe1]

Tucker sounds like hysterical Neocon David Frum This is really bad

http://www.frumforum.com/ron-pauls-base/

How do you figure? Tucker's article is about Trump supporters and Frum's is about Ron Paul supporters. They're diametric opposites. Which side are you on?

 

[alucard13mm]

Are you saying that you don't want to change the laws that are being written and passed?

I have been saying this a few times already.. but

The US constitution and bill of rights were written by evil, straight, christian, privileged, white men. If the Chinese, Russians or Mexicans were in charge of the USA back then... do you honestly think we would still have the constitution and bill of rights? Do you think you would have the freedoms and rights you enjoy today?

We wont because the Chinese, Russians, Mexicans or other non-european cultures would have a lower chance of coming up with these same rights/freedoms/laws. Why? Because different background, culture, religion, upbringing and education.

Open borders will be one step closer to One World government. We recently see how demographics are being changed and millions of people being moved from one part of the world to another in recent years. When you destroy nationalism (despite how bad it may be), you open the door to an even larger government.

Do I want to change laws? Sure. Just don't want outsiders changing the laws. I want white, christian, straight, privileged, evil men to do it. Besides... all poor and minorities migrates to white countries because of the laws made by whites.

 

[HankRicther12]

Dude. Let me help you out. When you see a little white balloon in a post, the odds are reasonably good that the post will be a response to the words in the white balloon. If the words in the balloon are about some stormfronters, white nationalists and/or David Duke fans who invaded the forums years ago, then the response might well be assumed to be a response pertaining to that very same subject. And to assume otherwise about the post is generally a sign that the person doing the assuming is either lacking enough in respect for the people in the conversation to be sloppy about following along, is deliberately trying to misrepresent what was said in an effort to make the person look ignorant, or is a result of retardation.

Excuse me while I refrain from speculating about whether I want Door #1, Door #2, or Door #3.

OK, that answered absolutely nothing.

Noticed it was you right off (who else could it be?), this is the only edit, sorry you came here to babble in the first place.

That reply wasn't to you, not sure if you noticed that, your maturity shows through yet again.

I'm not painting them all that way (we're talking millions of people, there all always going to be exceptions), just a solid majority, and that is what I've seen with my own eyes (granted, it may not be a representative sample, but it's all I have to go on). But, even supposing you're right, and they're not racist/chauvinist/xenophobic, they're just incorrigibly stupid - still, no debate is possible.

Right, that's why I said "or even most" right after it, should have just left it "most", my mistake.

 

[tangent4ronpaul]

Ask Stormfront

-t

 

[LibertyEagle]

//

 

[erowe1]

I have been saying this a few times already.. but

The US constitution and bill of rights were written by evil, straight, christian, privileged, white men. If the Chinese, Russians or Mexicans were in charge of the USA back then... do you honestly think we would still have the constitution and bill of rights? Do you think you would have the freedoms and rights you enjoy today?

We wont because the Chinese, Russians, Mexicans or other non-european cultures would have a lower chance of coming up with these same rights/freedoms/laws. Why? Because different background, culture, religion, upbringing and education.

Open borders will be one step closer to One World government. We recently see how demographics are being changed and millions of people being moved from one part of the world to another in recent years. When you destroy nationalism (despite how bad it may be), you open the door to an even larger government.

Do I want to change laws? Sure. Just don't want outsiders changing the laws. I want white, christian, straight, privileged, evil men to do it. Besides... all poor and minorities migrates to white countries because of the laws made by whites.

I don't know. You might not be as free as you think. Isn't following your prescription what got us where we are?

What's the minimum wage in Mexico?

What are their child labor laws?

What about occupational safety and environmental regulations?

What's their military budget?

How many times have they been attacked by terrorists because of their intervention in the Middle East?

What percentage of their population is in prison?

Do they have a massive nationalized health care that in any way rivals Obamacare?

Do they arrest people for letting their kids play outside unsupervised?

Can you buy halfway decent fireworks there?

 

[adissa]

oo

 

[HankRicther12]

I don't know. You might not be as free as you think. Isn't following your prescription what got us where we are?

What's the minimum wage in Mexico?

What are their child labor laws?

What about occupational safety and environmental regulations?

What's their military budget?

How many times have they been attacked by terrorists because of their intervention in the Middle East?

What percentage of their population is in prison?

Do they have a massive nationalized health care that in any way rivals Obamacare?

Do they arrest people for letting their kids play outside unsupervised?

Can you buy halfway decent fireworks there?

Kinda funny you say those things when most of the people coming from Mexico support big government, most of those laws were not around prior to the 60's, since the demographic shift, look what has happened. I don't blame every issue on immigration, but to act as tho it's not a big part of it is false.

When I read this post, I had to double check my calendar to make sure I hadn't fallen victim to one of those "Back to the Future" things, where maybe I had been shot back to September 7, 1955 instead of September 7, 2015. God forbid we might elect Black people or women (or *gasp* gay people -- oh, the horror!) to create laws in this country. Only "christian (sic), straight, privileged, evil men" should ever be elected to the House or Senate. Got it.

Thank God your opinion is now in the minority.

Wow, what a reply. You actually want to try addressing the points he made or are juvenile straw men what passes for facts in your world? Oh, and BTW, I'd love for you to show me anyone who gets elected to high office that isn't "privileged".

 

[erowe1]

Kinda funny you say those things when most of the people coming from Mexico support big government, most of those laws were not around prior to the 60's, since the demographic shift

What big demographic shift happened in the 60's? Hispanics were 3.5% of the US population in 1960 and still only 5% in 1970. We have those laws because they were supported by white people.

Who supports the war on drugs more? People coming from Mexico, or people born here? Who supports foreign interventionism more? Who supports child labor laws more? Who supports compulsory schooling more?

 

[William R]

How do you figure? Tucker's article is about Trump supporters and Frum's is about Ron Paul supporters. They're diametric opposites. Which side are you on?

David Duke endorse Ron Paul and now he's endorsed David Duke. Tucker like Frum is an idiot.

 

[erowe1]

David Duke endorse Ron Paul and now he's endorsed David Duke. Tucker like Frum is an idiot.

David Duke is an idiot who happened to stumble on something right one time. Tucker is a genius. Have you read much of his stuff?

He's also right about Trump. Do you disagree?

 

[LibertyEagle]

David Duke is an idiot who happened to stumble on something right one time. Tucker is a genius. Have you read much of his stuff?

He's also right about Trump. Do you disagree?

I haven't read his stuff, but I sure did see when he put Bunny Ranch, strippers or whatever it was for Ron Paul, on his night time show. I'm just sure it caused all kinds of Republicans to vote for RP. In other words, he is an ass and no friend of ours.

 

[LibertyEagle]

When I read this post, I had to double check my calendar to make sure I hadn't fallen victim to one of those "Back to the Future" things, where maybe I had been shot back to September 7, 1955 instead of September 7, 2015. God forbid we might elect Black people or women (or *gasp* gay people -- oh, the horror!) to create laws in this country. Only "christian (sic), straight, privileged, evil men" should ever be elected to the House or Senate. Got it.

Thank God your opinion is now in the minority.

Actually, he is one of the examples I have found of people who have immigrated here legally who actually have a clue about the principles upon which this country was founded. As opposed to many born here who don't have a clue in hell and are helping the globalists through their ignorance.

 

[erowe1]

I haven't read his stuff, but I sure did see when he put Bunny Ranch, strippers or whatever it was for Ron Paul, on his night time show. I'm just sure it caused all kinds of Republicans to vote for RP. In other words, he is an ass and no friend of ours.

You're thinking of Tucker Carlson.

 

[erowe1]

When I read this post, I had to double check my calendar to make sure I hadn't fallen victim to one of those "Back to the Future" things, where maybe I had been shot back to September 7, 1955 instead of September 7, 2015. God forbid we might elect Black people or women (or *gasp* gay people -- oh, the horror!) to create laws in this country. Only "christian (sic), straight, privileged, evil men" should ever be elected to the House or Senate. Got it.

Thank God your opinion is now in the minority.

Unfortunately, when it comes to the results of women's suffrage at least, he does have a point.

 

[HankRicther12]

What big demographic shift happened in the 60's? Hispanics were 3.5% of the US population in 1960 and still only 5% in 1970. We have those laws because they were supported by white people.

Who supports the war on drugs more? People coming from Mexico, or people born here? Who supports foreign interventionism more? Who supports child labor laws more? Who supports compulsory schooling more?

OK, I misspoke, the 60's is when the immigration laws were changed, but you got me, the demographic shift did not happen over night. You may also notice people on the right used to be non-interventionist, Ike and Nixon ended the Korean and Vietnam Wars, and even Reagan showed far more restraint than we see today, if these people coming across the border are so anti-govt, why is the govt fighting so hard to get them here? Are you really naive enough to believe they care about the well being of the poor immigrant?

I don't blame our FP on "white people", history has shown every race is capable of conquest and I don't exactly see peace in Mexico, or Nigeria, and it's not as if these wars are ever put to a vote of the people they are decided by politicians who, surprise, don't always act in the interest of the people, the point is tho, what you see with our Imperialism will happen anywhere if you give the govt that kind of power, so why on earth do I want to import more people who believe in big govt? How does that help the problem? You may argue they don't want that kind of big govt, but I'm sure you also know that doesn't matter, once the govt gets the power they do as they please with it.

 

[erowe1]

OK, I misspoke, the 60's is when the immigration laws were changed, but you got me, the demographic shift did not happen over night.

Therefore, the policies we were talking about didn't result from some big demographic shift.

 

[LibertyEagle]

You're thinking of Tucker Carlson.

Yup, you're right.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Unfortunately, when it comes to the results of women's suffrage at least, he does have a point.

Do women get to be citizens in your ideal society? Do they get to vote?