James Trafficant shocks Hannity with anti Israel lobby rant

max

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
4,453
Hannity had ex Congressman Traficante on today. Traficante was trashing Dems and Repugs. Other than Hannity sticking up for Repugs, it was a lovefest

that is until Traficante started going off on how the Israeli Lobby is behind the Iraq war and how they control the Congress....He even said that Hannity knows this but would be taken off the air if he talked about it.

Hannity stayed cordial, but kept telling him that he sounds "anti-semitic"...."hamas...Hezbullah...9/11...blah, blah

Traficante stuck to his guns. I can see why this guy was railroaded into prison.
 
I heard somewhere else that he'll be on tv with Hannity today as well.

Requesting a youtube!!! :)
 
I heard somewhere else that he'll be on tv with Hannity today as well.

Requesting a youtube!!! :)

I wa so impressed at how Traficante refused to allow Hannity to talk over him and bully him.

He really came on strong and Hannity was unable to derail the conversation....I wish RP was like that
 
I wa so impressed at how Traficante refused to allow Hannity to talk over him and bully him.

He really came on strong and Hannity was unable to derail the conversation....I wish RP was like that

That's what John Stadmiller (spelling?) said on RepublicBroadcasting. He wished Ron was as fired up about issues as Trafficant was.
 
You add Ron Paul and Traficant together and you get an awesome tag team match in the White House. With Ron Paul's libertarian principles and Traficant's rough tones we'd have a strong team.
Oh btw, Traficant will be attending my local tea party on October 17th. Finally!
 
I wa so impressed at how Traficante refused to allow Hannity to talk over him and bully him.

He really came on strong and Hannity was unable to derail the conversation....I wish RP was like that

Every movement needs its philosophical leaders to give guidance and education and its generals for the battlefield.
 
traficant sticks up for Obama, a bit naive he is... or maybe he's trying to win some brownie points
 
Hannity had ex Congressman Traficante on today. Traficante was trashing Dems and Repugs. Other than Hannity sticking up for Repugs, it was a lovefest

that is until Traficante started going off on how the Israeli Lobby is behind the Iraq war and how they control the Congress....He even said that Hannity knows this but would be taken off the air if he talked about it.

Hannity stayed cordial, but kept telling him that he sounds "anti-semitic"...."hamas...Hezbullah...9/11...blah, blah

Traficante stuck to his guns. I can see why this guy was railroaded into prison.

to clarify - Hannity specifically asked Traficante about previous comments he had made. That is when Traficant started discussing the issue. In response to Hannity's trying to get him to retract his statement, he read from the Netanyahu quote in response to the question, "Did Israel ask the U.S. first?" by saying "We control Congress, we control the United States (paraphrasing). "
 
to clarify - Hannity specifically asked Traficante about previous comments he had made. That is when Traficant started discussing the issue. In response to Hannity's trying to get him to retract his statement, he read from the Netanyahu quote in response to the question, "Did Israel ask the U.S. first?" by saying "We control Congress, we control the United States (paraphrasing). "

it was a Sharon quote.
 
This thread seems like a good place for this: Tones

Monday, September 28, 2009
An Attack on Iran will be a Prelude to Israel's Real Aims.
When Iran is attacked (that’s ‘when’, not ‘if’), Israel will likely simultaneously attack both Hamas in the Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and will also overrun the already occupied West Bank. It will overrun the West Bank because, despite the differences between Hamas and Fatah, such a massive onslaught by the Israelis will be seen not as an attack against Hamas, but as an attack against the Palestinian people. The Palestinians will quickly realise that such a massive attack will be for one purpose – the destruction of all Palestinian resistance, Hamas and Fatah, the complete occupation of all of the territories, the subjugation of all of the Palestinian people, and the dissolution of the Palestinian Authority putting an end once and for all any hope of any Palestinian state.

Israeli forces will also attack the south of Lebanon with the aim of occupying it and destroying all traces of Hezbollah. All this will be done on the pretext that Hamas and Hezbollah will likely retaliate against Israel in the event of an attack against Iran, and Israel’s attacks against the Palestinians and Hezbollah will be seen in the West as simply pre-emptive action to deter retaliatory strikes against Israel by those who they claim are ‘Iran’s proxies’.

To most in the Western world, Israel’s actions against the Palestinians and Hezbollah will be seen as merely a necessary side action of the main ‘event’; the attack against Iran.

While just a few weeks ago it seemed that Israel would have to go it alone or at least make the first move against Iran, it now seems, in the light of recent events in the US at the UN General Assembly and the revelations about Iran’s so-called ‘secret’ nuclear facility and the pronouncements made during press conferences at the G-20 meetings, that the US may be more inclined to take on a first strike attack against Iran itself or give the go ahead to Israel to launch a first wave attack and then finish it off for the Israelis while they deal with Hezbollah and the Palestinians.

Because an attack against Iran would be more than just the destruction of Irans nuclear facilities – that part of the attack would be for propaganda purposes only to justify the attack – the US would also have to launch massive attacks against Iran’s military and government institutions in an effort to get the Iranians to capitulate to US demands which would include the removal of Ahmadinejad and the Mullahs and the installation of a provisional government nominated by the UN as dictated to by the US.

The war against Iran will be so massive that Israel’s attack against Hezbollah and the Palestinians would seem little more than a side show to the West, yet the overall operation in reality is not so much about bringing Iran to its knees, but allowing Israel to achieve its life-long ambition of creating a permanent Greater Israel.

For Israel and the US many birds will be killed with one stone; Israel gets the West Bank, the Gaza, an impotent Syria, and access to the Litani River in south Lebanon after having destroyed Hezbollah. The US gets a friendly government in Iran which, in turn, will give the US far more clout in both Iraq and Afghanistan now that there is no longer a theocratic Iran to wield any influence in either country.

For Israel and the US an attack against their enemies is not about Iran’s ‘nuclear weapons program’ but about a carefully planned and manipulated set of events using a relentless world-wide propaganda campaign that will culminate in the long-term aims of the Zionists of Israel and the neoconservatives of the US.

Source article can be found here.
at 9/28/2009
1 comments:
Anonymous said...
"We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people."
(Rabbi Reichorn, in Le Contemporain, July 1st, 1880)
September 28, 2009 1:37 PM
 
Love how Hannity didnt take more than 2 seconds to say "I dont know, this all sounds pretty anti-Semitic to me. Are you anti-Semitic?"
 
Traficant should've said..."so Hannity, are you racist towards blacks because you dislike Obama?"

That always shuts up turds trying to use the anti-semite card. I've used that before against co-workers, friends, family. I come out feeling victorious every time. :D
 
Traficant should've said..."so Hannity, are you racist towards blacks because you dislike Obama?"

That always shuts up turds trying to use the anti-semite card. I've used that before against co-workers, friends, family. I come out feeling victorious every time. :D

When they ask: "Are you anti-semitic?" My reply is: "Are you paranoid?"

That would make a good thread, and that is, how do you answer to the accusation:"Are you anti-semitic?"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top