Jake Tapper nails Trump on "Mexican" judge comments in utterly mad interview

[dannno]

You just have a high bs tolerance. Mol makes it a race issue by pitting ethnicity against race and making race superior by data. So, using his chart, how many white Hispanics were in the white chart? He was the one that claimed Hispanics are white and that to argue race you would use mestizo. Sorry that you cannot see how twisted that is, but it takes some gymnastics to mess up the argument as bad as he does. And yet, he has folks like you thinking he's brilliant. Go figure. At least give him a clue what the hell a mestizo is because he looks full blown stupid to those who do know.

What does this have to do with anything? Weren't most of his charts in the video showing that something like 80%+ of the illegal immigrants are Democrat while it is closer to 50% of whites? Are you really trying to argue that the idea that bringing in more illegal immigrants won't have any affect on the electorate because of mestizos?? Are you serious?

This is really a pet peeve of Stef, not to mention myself - he went off on a rant one time for like 15 minutes and made some excellent points along the way - but toward the end he mentioned a gun and said "cocked the gun" and some guy in the comment section says, "you don't cock those type of guns.." like some how that little piece of information invalidated the last 15 minutes.. A lot of people do that, they can't see the big picture, they look for one little tiny flaw and see it as a crack in the whole argument when it really isn't. You need to be careful of that.

 

[dannno]

Pick one. Join the crowd of those of us who are mutts. I used to envy those who could be so confident in their ethnic identity. Now, I'm proud of my ancestors being so well traveled and apparently persuasive lovers with open minds.

Ok, so I take it then you oppose the NAACP since that is a group that is based on race? How is that group different from a Hispanic support group other than one is a race and one is an ethnicity?

 

[acptulsa]

Sorry that you cannot see how twisted that is, but it takes some gymnastics to mess up the argument as bad as he does. And yet, he has folks like you thinking he's brilliant. Go figure.

There was a 9/11 thread years ago in which he was fervently arguing that it wasn't airliners that hit the Twin Towers, but missiles spraying water mist and projecting holographic wings. How the big slots were cut in the sides of the buildings he did not say; maybe that was spray paint. I just looked for it, but unfortunately it seems to have been flushed down a Memory Hole. Pity, it was an amusing thread.

I tried to explain to him how this was COINTEL using him to make a laughing stock of the whole movement to learn the truth about 9/11, but he had his teeth in the thing and he wasn't letting go of it.

The Powers That Be certainly are masters at getting people to bite and making things a matter of pride over logic, aren't they?

 

[dannno]

There was a 9/11 thread years ago in which he was fervently arguing that it wasn't airliners that hit the Twin Towers, but missiles spraying water mist and projecting holographic wings.

And you didn't think he was being sarcastic at the time??? Lol... he argues against 9/11 being an inside job, not my favorite material of his, but nobody is perfect.

 

[acptulsa]

And you didn't think he was being sarcastic at the time??? Lol... he argues against 9/11 being an inside job, not my favorite material of his, but nobody is perfect.

I wasn't talking about Molyneux, O Ye of Faulty Memory, I was talking about you. You didn't even notice that you were siding with what had been, up until that time, the forum's Chief Official Debunker.

It was hilarious.

As for the fact that Molyneux used to be a debunker, well, that ought to tell you something. But, of course, you can come up with a thousand excuses for him, I'm sure.

 

[dannno]

I wasn't talking about Molyneux, O Ye of Faulty Memory, I was talking about you. You didn't even notice that you were siding with what had been, up until that time, the forum's Chief Official Debunker.

It was hilarious.

As for the fact that Molyneux used to be a debunker, well, that ought to tell you something. But, of course, you can come up with a thousand excuses for him, I'm sure.

First of all, look at the post you responded to - it sounded like you referring to Molyneux, you should have been more clear.. although I was confused as to why you were talking about a 9/11 thread, I thought maybe you were on his forum or something.

Second of all, I'm actually kind of glad you weren't more clear, because I never argued ANY of the things you said in your post and I would appreciate it if you delete them rather than posting lies mistruths about me. (Changed lies to mistruths because it was probably an honest mistake)

 

[silverhandorder]

Ok, so what if you are part British, part German, part Swedish and most of your ancestors came over hundreds of years ago? What support group do you join?

Still not sure how this invalidates him being able to compare groups to each other. You seem to be nitpicking down to the point where you don't really even have a point.

There was one time where he described what a mammal is and got swarmed with platypus posts. So maybe there are Irish bar associations. Who cares. I agree with you that is a nitpicking on her part. Especially when this LaRaza lawyers group is very activist and very anti trump. Like one can easily see bad they are yet they get zero grief for that. This Irishman's group would get slaughtered what the laraza group is doing.

 

[silverhandorder]

You just have a high bs tolerance. Mol makes it a race issue by pitting ethnicity against race and making race superior by data. So, using his chart, how many white Hispanics were in the white chart? He was the one that claimed Hispanics are white and that to argue race you would use mestizo. Sorry that you cannot see how twisted that is, but it takes some gymnastics to mess up the argument as bad as he does. And yet, he has folks like you thinking he's brilliant. Go figure. At least give him a clue what the hell a mestizo is because he looks full blown stupid to those who do know.

He does not generate the data. He has to work with what is available. He pointed out several times how he hates how retarded Hispanic/Latino is being used interchangeably all the time.

 

[acptulsa]

First of all, look at the post you responded to - it sounded like you referring to Molyneux, you should have been more clear.

Second of all, I never argued ANY of the things you said in your post and I would appreciate it if you delete them rather than posting lies about me.

Just because you shut it out of your memory doesn't mean it didn't happen.

But by all means, run to the mods. Maybe they can dig the old thread up for me, so I can enjoy laughing at it all over again.

It ain't libel if it's the gospel truth.

 

[dannno]

Just because you shut it out of your memory doesn't mean it didn't happen.

But by all means, run to the mods. Maybe they can dig the old thread up for me, so I can enjoy laughing at it all over again.

It ain't libel if it's the gospel truth.

it wasn't airliners that hit the Twin Towers, but missiles spraying water mist and projecting holographic wings.

Are you talking about the Pentagon? I have never argued for any missile theories at the twin towers - I did have some interesting theories about what happened at the Pentagon, but I've never posted anything about holograms....holographic wings?? That I would remember - I would be VERY surprised if I even linked to a website or video that had that information in it, but certainly did not post about holographic wings at the twin towers.

You must be mistaking me for someone else, or muddling posts together. I have a pretty damn good memory, it isn't perfect, but I know for a fact I wasn't making those arguments because I always thought the hologram/no plane theories at the twin towers were a bit overboard - possible maybe, but not something I would advocate for as an actual provable or probable theory.

 

[moostraks]

Ok, so I take it then you oppose the NAACP since that is a group that is based on race? How is that group different from a Hispanic support group other than one is a race and one is an ethnicity?

NAACP is for African-Americans. So that would be ethnicity.

 

[dannno]

NAACP is for African-Americans. So that would be ethnicity.

Mexicans -> ethnicity -> NOT A RACE

African Americans -> ethnicity -> Also share common race

 

[moostraks]

Mexicans -> ethnicity -> NOT A RACE

African Americans -> ethnicity -> Also share common race

Mexicans are a nationality. So?

 

[juleswin]

Mexicans are a nationality. So?

But but but.. Africa is a country too

 

[moostraks]

But but but.. Africa is a country too

I was waiting for that one....

 

[moostraks]

I was waiting for that one....

Which btw...would be a continent...

 

[twomp]

The idiot Trump supporters are trying to defend what Trump said by using technicalities. Kind of like Bill Clinton and his definition of what "is" is. It's difficult to go on to liberty oriented forums and try to drum up support for an authoritarian. So they have to result to idiot tactics.

 

[dannno]

Mexicans are a nationality. So?

Soo.....exactly!! Why are you saying Molyneux is being illogical by comparing groups of people? So what if that group is a ______ or a ________?

Nationality, ethnicity, race, who cares? He's just making comparisons between groups, it's not necessarily illogical to compare two groups of people.

 

[dannno]

The idiot Trump supporters are trying to defend what Trump said by using technicalities. Kind of like Bill Clinton and his definition of what "is" is. It's difficult to go on to liberty oriented forums and try to drum up support for an authoritarian. So they have to result to idiot tactics.

This is completely wrong. Trump made a statement that is arguably racial in that it deals with race (although it actuality it deals with ethnicity, but I am willing to ignore that for the sake of argument).. But it is not racist - PERIOD. People in this country are sick and tired of being called racist for not succumbing to every demand of the SJW leftist paradigm and being called racist for making a statement about a person's race or ethnicity that isn't even racist, it is just something that they don't like.

If Trump said he didn't want a Mexican Judge because they would be biased against him, then you could maybe get away with calling him a racist if you want. But Trump NEVER said that, he actually said that he didn't like his Judge because he was biased against him and made bad rulings, which he said was because he disagreed with him politically and was tangentially related to his race. That's not racist, PERIOD. There are no technicalities, it just isn't racist.

 

[moostraks]

Soo.....exactly!! Why are you saying Molyneux is being illogical by comparing groups of people? So what if that group is a ______ or a ________?

Nationality, ethnicity, race, who cares? He's just making comparisons between groups, it's not necessarily illogical to compare two groups of people.

It is stupid and illogical. He argued against it being a race then made an argument decrying the fact that a specific race can not have the same organizations as an ethnicity so...bias. It was stupid and illogical.

Then to double down on stupid, he says Hispanics are all whites and then goes to say that whites want less government but Hispanics want more government. Uh, you just said Hispanics were whites.

Add that to the mestizos argument of his and it is full on fail.