[It's official] Justin Amash running for US Senate (R-MI)

Doesn't matter how much it failed by.
Then don't say it cleared the path for it to pass, it's a blatant, bald faced lie.


Proving you can't read or are a blatantly gaslighting troll.
He told us his motivation was to let the DoD do it:

Proving you don't care about the truth or are just a petulant little child who makes things up
Again
"The NDAA says nothing about transgender persons or their medical treatment. These subjects are not addressed in the bill. Voting no on an amendment cannot add these subjects to the bill."


He's pretending that the surgery could possibly be necessary and that "the science" should be allowed to declare it is.
Adding the prohibition to the bill was the entire point and what he opposed on progressive grounds.
And you're making things up because you don't have a leg to stand on. Yea lets listen to the one with a twisted agenda and not the reason from Amash.
 
In my opinion, at least every president since after Coolidge deserves to have been impeached and removed for one reason and/or another.

Impeachments and removals from office should not need to be predicated upon the commission of criminal acts. Politicians and government bureaucrats are not entitled to their offices, and none of them have any right to not be figuratively defenestrated.

The commies and gun-grabbers and other would-be rights-violators should all be unceremoniously tossed out on their asses immediately upon detection of their presence - and for no other reason than that they are commies or gun-grabbers or would-be rights-violators. (And then they can be prosecuted for any criminal acts they might have committed.)


9xXSmmn.png


Indictments/Impeachments for false reasons are different from those for valid reasons or Impeachments for no reason.
Supporting those predicated on falsehoods leads to tyranny.

I have no problem with the idea of tryannizing the government. The government should be tyrannized.

And when it comes to booting out commies, gun grabbers, etc., if some false positives end up getting the boot along with the true positives, then that's fine, too. Again, politicians and government bureaucrats are not entitled to their offices, and no one's rights would be violated by denying them those positions, whatever the reasons (good or bad).
 
Last edited:
Then don't say it cleared the path for it to pass, it's a blatant, bald faced lie.




Proving you don't care about the truth or are just a petulant little child who makes things up
Again
"The NDAA says nothing about transgender persons or their medical treatment. These subjects are not addressed in the bill. Voting no on an amendment cannot add these subjects to the bill."


And you're making things up because you don't have a leg to stand on. Yea lets listen to the one with a twisted agenda and not the reason from Amash.

MzQ4
 
https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/status/1751667719189967279
9xXSmmn.png




I have no problem with the idea of tryannizing the government. The government should be tyrannized.

And when it comes to booting out commies, gun grabbers, etc., if some false positives end up getting the boot along with the true positives, then that's fine, too. Again, politicians and government bureaucrats are not entitled to their offices, and no one's rights would be violated by denying them those positions, whatever the reasons (good or bad).

MzQ4


It won't be the government getting tyrannized and everyone knows it.
It is the deepstate doing the tyrannizing and if facilitated by fools or traitors it will be aimed at the citizens after they use it to get rid of their opposition.
 


Gee, what an articulate rebuttal.

It won't be the government getting tyrannized and everyone knows it.
It is the deepstate doing the tyrannizing and if facilitated by fools or traitors it will be aimed at the citizens after they use it to get rid of their opposition.

No. We outnumber those psychos and we can totally tyrannize them. It takes some serious state worship to take it as a tenet of faith that politicians are unassailable. And such an ignorance of history that you don't even seem to know why the guillotine was invented.
 
Gee, what an articulate rebuttal.
All the better he deserves, I don't have to repeat myself every time he points at the sun and calls it the moon.


No. We outnumber those psychos and we can totally tyrannize them. It takes some serious state worship to take it as a tenet of faith that politicians are unassailable. And such an ignorance of history that you don't even seem to know why the guillotine was invented.

Tell it to the J6 prisoners.
Tell it to Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn.
 
All the better he deserves, I don't have to repeat myself every time he points at the sun and calls it the moon.

You expect us to repeat ourselves every time you point at Trump mooning us and call it the sun. Why wouldn't you return the courtesy?

Tell it to the J6 prisoners.
Tell it to Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn.

I'll do that. Meanwhile you tell it to Anastasia Romanov and Marie Antoinette.
 
It won't be the government getting tyrannized and everyone knows it.
It is the deepstate doing the tyrannizing and if facilitated by fools or traitors it will be aimed at the citizens after they use it to get rid of their opposition.

*whew!* Talk about "gaslighting"!

Summarily booting commies, gun-grabbers, etc. out of office is always a good thing and never a bad thing.

And the "deep state" angle just means there should be even more impeachments, not fewer (and they should be easier to see through to completion).

Tell it to the J6 prisoners.

You mean the J6ers Trump left twisting in the wind while he pardoned a random assortment of rappers?

You mean those prisoners?

LOL
 
Last edited:
*whew!* Talk about "gaslighting"!

Summarily booting commies, gun-grabbers, etc. out of office is always a good thing and never a bad thing.

And the "deep state" angle just means there should be even more impeachments, not fewer (and they should be easier to see through to completion).



You mean the J6ers Trump left twisting in the wind while he pardoned a random assortment of rappers?

You mean those prisoners?

LOL

The wolves want you to help them expel the shepherd by foul means, and because you think he eats a sheep now and then you cheer for it.
If Amash was honest or intelligent (whichever you want to claim he is short of) he would offer up articles of impeachment based on arguably real grounds.

I mean the J6 prisoners that Trump was being accused of (and currently prosecuted for) colluding with to launch a coup and insurrection, the pardons would have been overturned and used as evidence of his guilt.
A pardons would have conceded the precedent that the protests were indeed illegal insurrection and damaged our rights going forward.
You do know that nobody had been convicted when he left office, right?
Blanket pardons would also have protected any fed agents in the crowd should we catch them in the future.
 
If Amash was honest or intelligent (whichever you want to claim he is short of) he would offer up articles of impeachment based on arguably real grounds.

What makes you think he didn't? You assume that because nothing made it out of committee?

I mean the J6 prisoners that Trump was being accused of (and currently prosecuted for) colluding with to launch a coup and insurrection, the pardons would have been overturned and used as evidence of his guilt.

Now there's the true spirit of public service in a nutshell -- I let you go to prison so I don't have to because I'm more important than you.
 
What makes you think he didn't? You assume that because nothing made it out of committee?
If he did then he should say so.
And doing so wouldn't justify endorsing the kangaroo charges and court the deepstate ran.



Now there's the true spirit of public service in a nutshell -- I let you go to prison so I don't have to because I'm more important than you.
They all would have gone to prison anyway, and he wouldn't have been able to advocate for them or get back in office to do something about it.
And horrible precedents would have been set that would do far more harm. (I note you edited that part out of the quote)
 
They all would have gone to prison anyway, and he wouldn't have been able to advocate for them or get back in office to do something about it.

He could have done something about it before he left office. He didn't. He seems to have been more interested in the 2024 election than in them, in justice, or in you.
 
The wolves want you to help them expel the shepherd by foul means, and because you think he eats a sheep now and then you cheer for it.
If Amash was honest or intelligent (whichever you want to claim he is short of) he would offer up articles of impeachment based on arguably real grounds.

"ZOMG!1!! If we make it easier to boot commies, gun-grabbers, etc. out of government, the Deep State will win!!" LOL

I mean the J6 prisoners that Trump was being accused of (and currently prosecuted for) colluding with to launch a coup and insurrection, the pardons would have been overturned and used as evidence of his guilt.
A pardons would have conceded the precedent that the protests were indeed illegal insurrection and damaged our rights going forward.

(1) All of those accusations and interpretations were going to happen, did happen, and are happening, anyway, so he avoided nothing, and
(2) Trump easily could have used the pardons as a platform to explicitly reject such accusations and interpretation. (It's a technique called "using words to specify conditions".)

But he's a narcissistically image-obsessed coward who has no principles [1], so instead ...





You do know that nobody had been convicted when he left office, right?

Charges (let alone convictions) aren't required prior to the issuance of pardons.

Blanket pardons would also have protected any fed agents in the crowd should we catch them in the future.

Trump easily could have exempted "fed agents" in the text of any pardons. (It's a technique called "using words to specify conditions".)

But he's a narcissistically image-obsessed coward who has no principles [1], so instead ...


[1] And the hell of it is, having no principles still puts him ahead of Biden and others, who have bad principles.
 
Last edited:

https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1763232693985161365
{Justin Amash @justinamash | 29 February 2024}

When I established an exploratory committee for Senate, I understood the challenge ahead. Running for office requires an extraordinary commitment, not just from the candidate but also from family, friends, volunteers, and donors. A campaign puts them through so much. That’s reason enough not to run for office unless there’s a clear path to victory and a high likelihood of success.

After thoroughly evaluating all aspects of a potential campaign, I’m convinced that no candidate would be better positioned to win both the Republican primary and the general election. That’s why, today, I’m making it official: I’m joining the race for United States Senate in Michigan.

The past few years away from Congress have given me time to reflect on the experiences that have shaped my life, the principles of liberty that inspire me, and what my tenure in Congress meant to the people of my community.

My parents arrived in the United States as teenagers in search of a better future—my father, a Palestinian refugee, and my mother, a Syrian immigrant. They instilled in me a love for America and for the values and principles at the heart of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

We live in the greatest country on earth, but the ideals that have made it great are increasingly taken for granted. People often feel helpless and hopeless, unheard and ignored by Washington, and trapped between opposing forces who reject America’s principles or don’t understand them.

So many times in my daily life, I’ve been approached by individuals who want me to know how much it meant to them that I did exactly what I said I’d do: that I upheld the Constitution regardless of the political consequences, that I read the bills, that I explained my votes, that I listened to the people I represented and held myself accountable to them in open town halls—giving them an opportunity to change my mind whenever we disagreed, and me an opportunity to change theirs.

I feel an obligation to get back to this work, but the circumstances of this upcoming election give it urgency.

Regardless of who wins the White House and Congress, the United States will remain deeply polarized. What we need is not a rubber stamp for either party, but an independent-minded senator prepared to challenge anyone and everyone on the people’s behalf—someone focused not on extending federal power so Republicans or Democrats in Washington can achieve their political ends, but on ensuring that Americans have the personal and economic freedom to pursue their own ends.

As I wrote when I launched my exploratory committee: We need a principled, consistent constitutional conservative in the Senate—someone with a record of taking on the bipartisan oligarchy, defending sound money and free speech, fighting the surveillance state and military-industrial complex, and protecting all our rights.

The advantage is ours in this battle, but that doesn’t mean victory will be easy. Mitch McConnell’s handpicked candidate, Mike Rogers, has built his career on expanding the power of the state at the expense of individual liberty, and the establishment will stop at nothing to get him elected.

But I’d take you over them any day.

Your financial support will be critical in this contest, so please give whatever you can at justinamash.com. These resources will support our operation to collect petition signatures to make the ballot and will allow us to build out our team across the state.

Please also sign up at our website to let me know how you can contribute your time and talents to this effort. I’ll need your constant advocacy over the next several months. Videos, memes, graphics, messages—anything you can do to get the word out—will make a big difference.

This is the land of liberty, and it’s on us to defend it. Thank you for standing with me.
 
Amash for Senate

Don't think I've seen this here.

GRAND RAPIDS, MI — The list of Republicans vying to replace U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Lansing, grew even longer Thursday, with former Congressman Justin Amash announcing he’s joining the race.

Amash, who represented Grand Rapids in Congress from 2011 to 2021, made the announcement on X, formerly known as Twitter.

“After thoroughly evaluating all aspects of a potential campaign, I’m convinced that no candidate would be better positioned to win both the Republican primary and the general election,” he wrote. “That’s why, today, I’m making it official: I’m joining the race for United States Senate in Michigan.”

Amash joins a Republican field that includes former Congressman Mike Rogers, R-Brighton, former Congressman Peter Meijer, R-Grand Rapids Township, businessman and economist Sandy Pensler, and others. Stabenow announced last year that she will retire at the end of her term, leaving the seat open. Long lists of candidates have emerged, Democrat and Republican alike.

https://www.mlive.com/news/grand-ra...n-nomination-for-michigan-us-senate-seat.html

Mike Rogers needs to lose because he's a neocon. IIRC, his wife is a defense consultant or some such grift. Then there's a Jewish supremacist Democrap who will have the Satanic trifecta behind her. I haven't forgiven Amash for impeachment but it is what it is and I hope he wins.
 
Hopefully he wins, but he has created so much bad will against himself that he doesn't have much of a chance. I hope I'm wrong.
 
Back
Top