Is there any way to persuade Paul to offer veep to Kucinich, and soon?

Would that help Paul or hurt him? I think Kucinich is a principled guy and all...but "Department of Peace"?....To me that naivete is dangerous...
That's alot of hippy bull and not indicitive of human nature. IMO :)
 
Todd Morris said:
Would that help Paul or hurt him? I think Kucinich is a principled guy and all...but "Department of Peace"?....To me that naivete is dangerous...
That's alot of hippy bull and not indicitive of human nature. IMO :)
Click to expand...

I have no doubt that Kucinich would help, if he were offered and accepted. It should be obvious to all that people would vote for the ticket that would not if it were Paul and someone else.

However, it's also obvious that he would lose votes too, because of it. Would it hurt more than it would help? Not sure.

And the Department of Peace thing is grandstanding to make a point, more than it is solid policy, I think. Kucinich would no doubt be happy to help put a tighter leash on the Department of War, as would I. Was Paul really wanting to declare war against Iraq when he introduced that? Hell no, he was just making a point. I think some of Kucinich's stuff is the same way (though, not all of it).

DailyKos had some links that seemed to check out, and both have rejected it, so it's all moot anyway. I still hope that Kucinich could somehow turn it around and get the nomination of the democrats... better him than someone who'll keep the war going.

Besides which, Kucinich seems to have a bad case of Ron Paul envy. I'm nowhere near as enamored of him as VP as I was a month ago.
 
Oddball said:
Dr. Paul wants a theocracy!?!?!????????

That's a new one on me. Care to back that assertion up with some of them "facts" thingys???
Click to expand...

So, I get PMed to me this steaming heap of shit as our buddy Kade's "proof" that Dr. Paul is determined to create a theocracy in America.

If I had to, I'd be hard pressed to find a bigger collection of stereotype, characterization, mischaracterization, distortion, non sequitur, delusions and out-and-out lies concerning what Dr. Paul's real thoughts on a federally established religion truly are.




And I'm an agnostic, skippy.
 
Last edited:
Kucinich as VP? Never, but a cabinet member? Maybe, depends on which post. Head of a new special independent committee on 9/11? Yes. Or a similar corruption probe of Blackwater, Haliburton, et al? Yes! Or as chair of a project to fully open ALL the juicy CIA, DIA, DHS etc. files, so we can finally expose the underbelly and entrails of the whole corporate welfare media-military industrial complex? YES!!!!
 
Peace&Freedom said:
Kucinich as VP? Never, but a cabinet member? Maybe, depends on which post. Head of a new special independent committee on 9/11? Yes. Or a similar corruption probe of Blackwater, Haliburton, et al? Yes! Or as chair of a project to fully open ALL the juicy CIA, DIA, DHS etc. files, so we can finally expose the underbelly and entrails of the whole corporate welfare media-military industrial complex? YES!!!!
Click to expand...

What do the rest of you think? Is a cabinet post out of the question, or would this be another 20 replies of semi-literate "nononono I won't vote for Paul then" ?
 
Kucinich does carry a copy of the constitution around in his pocket.

They might agree on more then we know.

Of course, what government does and how it does it they obviously differ.
 
NoMoreNicksLeft said:
> RP sticks to his principles, or have you forgotten this?

I would hope that bipartisanship is one of them. I dunno. You people act like I suggested Hillary. Sometimes I wonder.
Click to expand...

Nobody here is suggesting that he is a bad candidate because he is a Democrat. People are suggesting that he is a social and fiscal liberal - the polar opposite of Congressman Paul.

I know he's a nice guy, and he's an honest guy. I do not agree with him politically, therefore I don't want him to be the VP.
 
NoMoreNicksLeft said:
What do the rest of you think? Is a cabinet post out of the question, or would this be another 20 replies of semi-literate "nononono I won't vote for Paul then" ?
Click to expand...

While I would certainly dislike the idea of Kucinich as a VP, and it would make me cringe to think he's so close to the presidency, that wouldn't pull my vote away from Ron Paul. Getting Paul elected is too important, even if his choice of VP is bad. On a side note, naming Kucinich his VP would seem to be a political move (to garner support from that side), not a practical one (where they would agree on most issues), so I don't think he'd do it.

But regarding a member of his cabinet as a previous poster mentioned.. I think that might be an excellent idea.

braumstr said:
Kucinich does carry a copy of the constitution around in his pocket.
Click to expand...

I find it odd that he carries that around, and then virtually everything out of his mouth (except regarding the war and the Patriot Act) seem to fly in the face of the Constitution, unless he's proposing amendments to allow the government to do all of these things he wants them to do.
 
he should just offer kucinich a position as secretary of defense
 
braumstr said:
Well, I am not a socialist but what would he need an amendment for?
Click to expand...

My understanding of Kucinich's position on issues (and correct me if I'm wrong) is that he wants to expand federal involvement in education, health care, retirement, and many other things. None of these are authorized by the constitution, so an amendment would be needed to allow them.

There are many things the federal government does that they are not authorized to do, and that is certainly the primary problem with our government. Social Security is not authorized, Medicare is not authorized, the Department of Education is not authorized, the Patriot Act is not authorized, federal drug laws are not authorized, a federal Amber Alert system is not authorized, the EPA is not authorized; and the list goes on.

While Kucinich is against the war on drugs and the Patriot Act, I believe he would not only want to continue but possibly expand the rest of the areas I've listed. If he understands that little book that he carries around in his pocket, then he knows that all of these would need amendments passed first. If he did these things without amendments first being passed, then he's no better or more honorable then the rest of the candidates that ignore the law.
 
I love kucinich but I don't think it'd be a good idea.

It'd really put off a lot of conservatives if he ran with such a left wing person.

Kucinich is stuck with the apathy of the democrats and I feel sorry for him, he's a great man just like the good Dr., but Ron has to keep his eyes on the prize, not try to bring kucinich into the race.
 
We all know that Dr. Paul is highly intelligent and experienced. He will pick the right VP for him. We really have no place to even recommend a VP to him. We trust him to make a great decision. So, let’s get back to the important tasks at hand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
There Is No “Efficient” Government
Replies
3
Views
3K
GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged
G
PAF
Trump, the Final Downfall of this Country, and the Mass Slavery to Follow
Replies
2
Views
2K
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
PAF
Identifying and Treating “Climate Anxiety”—Vermont State Agency Offers Help to the Helping
Replies
1
Views
566
PAF
PAF
PAF
A Free-Market Guide to Trump’s Immigration Crackdown
Replies
4
Views
1K
TheTexan
TheTexan
PAF
There Is No Limit to State Power, and There Never Has Been
Replies
4
Views
948
Matt Collins
Matt Collins
Back
Top