BeFranklin
Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
- Messages
- 5,096
I would prefer to have a constitution rather than not. As Patrick Henry said, "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
For those who prefer the Articles, I think they offer more danger to our liberty. For one the ingenious "divison of powers" and "checks and balances" are not present. The sole body of government was a unicarmal legislature. The lack of a judiciary was quite scary. As Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 22, "Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation." Also, without another house of legislature, or an executive holding veto power, too much power was vested in the hands of too few people.
True, but all that is less necessary under the Articles, because the federal government is smaller and the States have more power and operate more like independent Stat.. countries.