The average height of Presidents since Kennedy has been just under 6'1".
Most of the posts I've seen have said he's 5'7", and Hillary is also 5'7", but Hillary can wear higher heels than Rand can get away with. That could make Rand look puny.
And Romney was taller than Obama. I'm not even a big Rand Paul fan, but I seriously don't think being 5'8 or 5'9 is going to hurt him at all. And if it does, it just goes to show what a complete farce our republic or "democracy" is. We might as well be electing President Camacho.
I find this whole thread retarded. If height is the only thing that matters, then why bother with this whole campaign? If the electorate is that stupid, to elect a president solely on height, then what is the point? Also, why haven't any Harlem Globetrotters been elected president? Sometimes this board baffles me with its stupidity.
What are you doing with Rand's wife?
Beauty and the beast.
The sooner we accept that it is a disadvantage the sooner we can begin to accentuate Rand's positives like his demeanor, his humor, and wit and try to draw attention away from the fact that he is 5'8.
I think Medvedev, Putin and Hilary are shorter than Rand.
Isn't his candidacy already sunk over the curly hair thing?
Height doesn't matter as much as hair, face, outfits, etc. There are plenty of short male celebrities that get more media attention and are more liked than any politician. To further prove my point, Tom Cruise. Enough said. ^_^
I totally agree and have said this in countless threads. Rand needs to get a new hair style and some coloring; nobody is going to vote for a guy that looks like he just rolled out of bed and doesn't own a comb or mirror.
Maybe a spiked mohawk?It would help with the height and the curly hair thing.
Ha Ha LMAO! Exactly what I was thinking he can campaign on stilts.
Uh guys, women love Rand's hair.![]()