Mini-Me
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 6,514
You can oppose Obama without being a racist but I can't see someone other than a white supremacist could see MLK as anything short of a hero.
Frankly, I think the poll needs more than two options. I imagine people's feelings are more nuanced than "yes" or "no." I'm voting yes, but I can see why others might not. Honestly, I have some mixed feelings towards MLK...or rather, I have mixed feelings about the way people view - and must view - MLK. His powerful speeches about equality and justice are moving, and combined with his strong presence and influence, his commitment to nonviolence and civil disobedience probably saved this country a whole lot of grief. Could you imagine what might have happened if someone more militant and inflammatory became the predominant lightning rod for the movement, rather than MLK?* On the whole, I think that makes him a hero...but he was a flawed hero, and it bothers me that history books, the media, and popular culture all cover up his faults and worship him like some kind of perfect saint. It bothers me that people are not even allowed to deviate from that worship without being called racist. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a hero...but he was also a plagiarist, and he also betrayed his wife with extramarital affairs. He also had socialist tendencies (although he at least recognized the injustice of Communism's totalitarianism), and that's another flaw in my book. None of these flaws are anywhere near deal-breakers for me, because of all the good he did...but the problem is that you're not even "allowed" to bring them up or criticize him for them, because some people feel that the actual man cannot stand on his own and must be replaced by a perfect idol. This gives rise to a mindless false dichotomy between, "either you worship him or you're a racist." The groupthink and conformity is so prevalent that every single person must fear judgment if they do not walk on eggshells and dishonestly speak only of a perfect caricature of a man. Well, you know what? Fuck that.
*Some might say that he wasn't as nonviolent as we make him out to be...I remember someone criticized me on these forums a year ago about assuming he was, and that poster claimed otherwise. Even if that poster was right though, MLK at the very least paid far more lip service to nonviolence than probably anyone else we could have hoped for. By using nonviolent rhetoric in his speeches, I think he saved a lot of lives and kept the movement from backfiring.
Last edited: