Anti Globalist
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2017
- Messages
- 44,854
I'm expecting nothing of substance will be released tomorrow. Those files will be filled to the brim with redactions.
I just figure it took them two months to fabricate a bunch of fake documents and that's why they're being released nowI'm expecting nothing of substance will be released tomorrow. Those files will be filled to the brim with redactions.
What did we learn new from the JFK files release?
Based on the information available as of March 19, 2025, the recent release of JFK assassination files on March 18, 2025, ordered by President Donald Trump, has provided some new context but no groundbreaking revelations that fundamentally alter the established narrative. Here’s what has emerged from the release of approximately 1,123 documents (part of an estimated 80,000 pages), as reported by various sources:
In summary, the March 18, 2025, JFK files release offers historians and the public more granular details about Oswald’s activities, intelligence operations, and agency dynamics in 1963. However, as of now, it does not appear to overturn the long-standing conclusion that Oswald acted alone, nor does it provide definitive proof of conspiracy theories that have persisted for decades. Scholars expect it will take time to fully sift through the documents, but the initial takeaway is one of added context rather than a rewritten history.
- Confirmation of Existing Narrative: The files largely reinforce the Warren Commission’s conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. Historians and experts, including those cited in news reports, have noted that while the documents add detail, they do not appear to contradict the lone gunman theory.
- CIA Surveillance of Oswald: The documents provide additional insight into the CIA’s monitoring of Oswald prior to the assassination. This includes details about his trip to Mexico City in September 1963, where he visited the Soviet and Cuban embassies. Previously released files had hinted at this, but the unredacted versions clarify the extent of CIA surveillance, such as intercepted phone calls with a KGB officer. However, there’s no evidence this surveillance uncovered a conspiracy or that the CIA withheld actionable intelligence from the FBI beyond what was already suspected.
- FBI and CIA Coordination Issues: One notable detail is the suggestion that information about Oswald was not adequately shared between the CIA and FBI. This has raised questions about whether this was due to bureaucratic inefficiency or something more deliberate, though no concrete evidence of a cover-up has surfaced in these files.
- Additional Context on Oswald’s Ties: The files flesh out Oswald’s connections to Cuba and the Soviet Union, including his travels and interactions. For example, a former KGB agent’s assessment, included in the release, asserts that Oswald was not controlled by Soviet intelligence, supporting prior conclusions. These details enrich the historical record but don’t point to a broader conspiracy.
- No Major Bombshells: Despite initial hype from White House statements suggesting shocking revelations, early analyses—such as those from The New York Times and historians like Tim Naftali—indicate the documents are more about protecting past CIA intelligence-gathering methods than revealing explosive secrets. The majority of the files are short (under 10 pages each) and lack the coherence to support conspiracy theories involving the CIA, Mafia, or a second shooter.
- Eerie but Inconclusive Details: Some documents, like an FBI memo about a phone call discussing Oswald’s death shortly after the assassination, add an eerie layer to the story. However, these do not shift the core understanding of events.
- Ongoing Digitization and Review: Not all files are fully accessible online yet; some remain in hard copy at the National Archives in College Park, Maryland, with digitization in progress. Additionally, the FBI’s February 2025 discovery of 2,400 previously unrecognized records (about 14,000 pages) suggests more material may still be analyzed, but these were not part of the March 18 release and their contents remain unclear.
https://twitter.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1902235846801015053
https://twitter.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1902178930271936757
Just to clarify, this wasn't me ...
Pay attention to the rumor of a crazed man outside of CIA HQ, comrade! Or you will be reported!Holy shit, an unconfirmed report of a man possibly outside a building ???
What has this world come to??
For more on Cummings and Interarms:So far, this tidbit is attracting some attention...
![]()
But also hearing this was previously released....
John Tower was married to none other than Samuel Cummings’s sister, Lilla Burt Cummings.
Representative Tower helped the Interarms company in their arms deals.
Who do you think President Reagan selected in 1986, for a commission to “investigate” the so-called Iran-Contra affair?!? John Tower...
In 1989, Tower was nominated for Secretary of Defense by President Bush Sr., rejected by the US Senate!
Frank Sturgis bought large numbers of weapons through Interarmco for Fidel Castro. According to Sturgis’ testimony before the Rockefeller Commission, he learned that Interarmco’s “owner”, Sam Cummings, was a CIA agent.
![]()
https://www.muckrock.com/news/archi...owers-fbi-file-reveals-role-iran-contra-cove/
(http://web.archive.org/web/20190721004456/https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2017/jan/09/john-towers-fbi-file-reveals-role-iran-contra-cove/)
In the spring of 1989, Robert Maxwell and his daughter Ghislaine hosted a party on his yacht in the presence of Donald Trump, former US senator John Tower (involved in Iran-Contra), and ex-navy secretary John Lehman.
See Donald showing his thumb, John Tower to his right and Robert Maxwell on the far right.
![]()