Is a tiny NH town going to prove 2020 election fraud beyond a shadow of doubt?

[CaptUSA]

This is incredible.

It's par for the course.

"fear of inciting violence" is the new catch-all for any type of cover up. "Well, we would investigate the fraud, but people might get violent." "We would investigate killing grandmas in nursing homes, but people might get violent." "We had to doctor and creating misleading evidence or people might get violent."

It's pathetic. It comes down to, "if you knew what was really going on, you wouldn't let us control you any more."

 

[donnay]

Follow up:

Windham, New Hampshire Election Witnesses Discuss Voting Machine Scandal with Gateway Pundit and 100% Fed Up (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...machine-scandal-gateway-pundit-100-fed-video/

 

[orafi]

...

 

[Invisible Man]

https://twitter.com/insomnochick/status/1361153094395047936

I don't know if I am navigating that website wrong or what. But I can't find an article that gives the details that support the claim in the tweet that the state is blocking further investigation. There's a headline saying the Department of Justice refuses to investigate it, but just a headline and nothing else. Everything below that is just rehashing stuff from older articles.

 

[donnay]

Union Leader Glosses Over Serious Unresolved Election Issue in Windham NH
https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/...rious-unresolved-election-issue-in-windham-nh

 

[donnay]

What The Heck Happened In Windham’s November Election? – Part 1
https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/...happened-in-windhams-november-election-part-1

 

[oyarde]

Ok , let me see if I got this . Live Free or die state knows there is 6 percent or more vote fraud but decide to not look into it any further ? Every losing candidate on the ballots within 20 percent should sue the state for lost wages of the office and see if they'll pay it to keep it under the rug . Better than a stimuli check LOL

 

[CaptUSA]

 

[Anti Federalist]

Monday 15 Feb. 2021

Dear Gov. Sununu,

I am writing in regard to the following stories printed online at "The Granite Grok" and "The Gateway Pundit" among other online sources.

<links>

It seems that there has been clear evidence of vote fraud produced by these investigators and that the NH bureaucracy seems unwilling to take the lead on this and investigate further.

I am asking that you immediately direct the Attorney General to open an investigation into these serious allegations.

Regards,
Anti Federalist
My town NH

 

[Anti Federalist]

More SWLODs inbound to my state reps and senator

 

[jmdrake]

I just realized something watching this. It does not matter if the N.H. election wasn't enough to win Trump the presidency. It might have been enough for the GOP to keep the senate! Paging [MENTION=58229]TheCount[/MENTION].

 

[Anti Federalist]

I just realized something watching this. It does not matter if the N.H. election wasn't enough to win Trump the presidency. It might have been enough for the GOP to keep the senate! Paging [MENTION=58229]TheCount[/MENTION].

The fraud was in place because NH was in play and could have made a difference.

 

[donnay]

I just realized something watching this. It does not matter if the N.H. election wasn't enough to win Trump the presidency. It might have been enough for the GOP to keep the senate! Paging [MENTION=58229]TheCount[/MENTION].

The appearance of many R's getting in was deliberate as to not have many of them ask for a recount and bring attention to the fraud. Windham request for a recall was done by a democrat and as luck would have it knocked back the veil of fraud.

This happened during the 2008 Presidential election and one of the reasons I was angry at Dr. Paul for not asking for a recount, because we knew then that there was definite fraud that took place. A candidate has to demand a recount before anything is done.

 

[jmdrake]

The appearance of many R's getting in was deliberate as to not have many of them ask for a recount and bring attention to the fraud. Windham request for a recall was done by a democrat and as luck would have it knocked back the veil of fraud.

This happened during the 2008 Presidential election and one of the reasons I was angry at Dr. Paul for not asking for a recount, because we knew then that there was definite fraud that took place. A candidate has to demand a recount before anything is done.

Okay. But the point the video made that I was highlighting is that no federal R's got elected in N.H. even though they were winning a majority of the state houses. That's what caused the suspicion. It was possibly a triple steal. (N.H. president, house and senate races).

 

[Anti Federalist]

Okay. But the point the video made that I was highlighting is that no federal R's got elected in N.H. even though they were winning a majority of the state houses. That's what caused the suspicion. It was possibly a triple steal. (N.H. president, house and senate races).

In looking at the numbers you may be correct.

I knew that, federally, the winners were Shaheen, Kuster and Pappas, and knew they would probably win again (NH's federal representation sucks).

But I did not know they all won by double digits, and I don't find that plausible at all.

 

[phill4paul]

Okay. But the point the video made that I was highlighting is that no federal R's got elected in N.H. even though they were winning a majority of the state houses. That's what caused the suspicion. It was possibly a triple steal. (N.H. president, house and senate races).

Yes, it possibly was. In N.H. and any number of states. And until machine integrity is guaranteed then they need to be outlawed. Ballots need to be hand counted with election witnesses from both parties present and a video recording of all said counts.

 

[phill4paul]

SMDH. FarceBook gotta fact-check when I posted this article

Is a hand recount of 2020 election results in Windham, New Hampshire, proof of election fraud by "Dominion Voting Machines"? No, that's not true: The results changed markedly in the recount, but it's unclear why. The original report, the recount or both may have been made in error. The mere fact of a discrepancy is not evidence of fraud, which involves intent to deceive. The New Hampshire attorney general's office has been asked to review the election and has requested information from officials in Windham. Significantly, there have been no allegations of wrongdoing or fraud, and the results of the recount did not change the outcome of the election. It is fair to say, however, that questions about the vote remain.

https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/...7K83P8srncgaHfprsDh0Af9Qmt3iLJ0goGAgKDTglosg4

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Now we know why they are keeping troops at Fortress DC.

 

[pcosmar]

, and I don't find that plausible at all.

I do not believe for a second that this County voted 46% democrat.. but that is what the Machines said.

One county in Washington busted the Machine too. Franklin co. I believe.

It was immediately ignored and/or Shouted Down.

 

[Swordsmyth]

This is not the first election with fraud. In fact most have probably had it to some degree or another. The extent of it has not been proven. Certainly Trump did not win by the "largest landslide in history" as you falsely claimed on the other forum. Even by Trumps own estimates of flipped votes that is not true. Hyperbole and throwing people under the bus like Rand Paul who have done a good job of articulating the fraud without making claims he couldn't defend helps no one.

Bunk.
The extent has been proven, it was the largest landslide in history and Rand not only refused to object to the fraudulent slates but made the ridiculous claim that he couldn't and that the states have a right to cheat if they want.