Invasion USA

There usually is, and I haven't got it.

All I know is none of it would have happened if he was not where he didn't belong.

He applied for asylum in accordance to the law.

Of course it is possible that he was in the wrong place at the wrong time possibly with the wrong woman [how many men are falsely accused]. That could be said of any one of us, including you. Perhaps "Stop and Frisk" and Nationalized LEO Immunity will help solve your problem.
 
https://x.com/Klaus_Arminius/status/1851698230553354426
9QQREUu.png


 

Germans are, for all intents and purposes, disarmed.

While I certainly appreciate Massie's sentiment here, how exactly do you "not comply" with something like this?

The people "worked within the system" and said, no, we do not want this.

The government said "go fuck yourselves, you're getting 500 invaders whether you like it or not".

So how do you "not comply"?

You can't fight back, you're disarmed.

You can't move, where you gonna go, this is happening all across the west.

You can't shun or reject or disengage with the invaders, you'll be arrested for hate crimes.

You can't petition the government for redress of grievances, they are the ones exterminating you.

You can't rally your town and neighbors into supporting you to do...whatever, because that is illegal as well and you'll be arrested.

So, honest question, how DO you "not comply", specifically, with something like this?
 
Germans are, for all intents and purposes, disarmed.

While I certainly appreciate Massie's sentiment here, how exactly do you "not comply" with something like this?

The people "worked within the system" and said, no, we do not want this.

The government said "go fuck yourselves, you're getting 500 invaders whether you like it or not".

So how do you "not comply"?

My posting of Massie's tweet wasn't intended as an extolment of or exhortation to "non-complaince" (though I approve and endorse doing both of those things).

It was actually the first sentence in Massie's tweet ("Ultimately, government is whatever the people in power can get away with and whatever the people they govern will tolerate.") that I had in mind when I posted it. The other tweet about the German village was just an excellent concrete illustration of the abstract principle Massie expressed in that statement (especially given Massie's subsequent reference to "democracies" in his second sentence).

But since you ask: you can "not comply" by ... well, by not complying - at risk of whatever consequences that might entail.

That is, after all, what "non-compliance" literally means.

You can't fight back, you're disarmed.

You can "not comply" by arming yourself anyway (and then fighting back, if it comes to it) - at risk of whatever consequences that might entail.

You can't move, where you gonna go, this is happening all across the west.

If it is not not as bad in some places as it is in others, then you can "not comply" by moving to one of those places.

You can't shun or reject or disengage with the invaders, you'll be arrested for hate crimes.

You can "not comply" by shunning, rejecting, or disengaging anyway - at risk of whatever consequences that might entail.

You can't petition the government for redress of grievances, they are the ones exterminating you.

That is correct - and it is not possible to "not comply" by asking the government for permission.

You can't rally your town and neighbors into supporting you to do...whatever, because that is illegal as well and you'll be arrested.

You can "not comply" by rallying your town and neighbors into supporting you anyway - at risk of whatever consequences that might entail.

So, honest question, how DO you "not comply", specifically, with something like this?

See above. Massie was not trafficking in "sentiment". He was just stating a simple, inescapable fact.

He said only that non-compliance is "key". He did not say that it is easy, or without risk - or even that it would work, for that matter. Non-compliance is necessary, but it still might not be sufficient. IOW: Even if you do "not comply", then you still might lose - but if you don't "not comply", then you will certainly lose.

Either things will (eventually) get to the point that enough people are willing and able to "not comply" (as described above, or by other means) - or they won't. You and I and probably most (all ?) of everyone else around here are impatient outliers. Most other people outside our "merry band of refuseniks" have higher "bars" (or more distant "red lines") for what is intolerable than we do. While we watch the waterline rise, we can only hope that there will be enough people whose bars are low enough to trigger a spillover before we all drown. (In contrast to Americans today, the "bars" of the American colonists were remarkably low - and I'm not even talking about armed revolution. Tea, anyone? Or maybe some tar, with a side of feathers ... [1])

Fortunately - and unlike the Germans - Americans are heavily armed. That factor alone may account for why America is not yet quite as far gone as other places (such as Germany). In any case, I'm sure it's something that gives TPTB severe indigestion, which is why they're so keen on things like gun control. An armed populace makes the prospect of pushing back against any significant degree of non-compliance much more problematic for them than it otherwise would be.



[1] Which reminds me: I still wonder if there is any truth at all to the recent rumors of busybody/busywork Feds being menaced in North Carolina ...
 

No "Halloween" ... no "Thanksgiving" ... no anything but "fall celebrations" ... (and then, just "celebrations" ... and then, just ... nothing ...)

They won't be satisfied until all humanity is just one big bland, generic, amorphous, homogeneous blob of "belonging and partnership".

(And after all, when you get right down to it, can anything really be more "equitable" and "inclusive" than abject nihilism?)
 
Last edited:
No "Halloween" ... no "Thanksgiving" ... no anything but "fall celebrations" ... (and then, just "celebrations" ... and then, just ... nothing ...)

They won't be satisfied until all humanity is just one big bland, generic, amorphous, homogeneous blob of "belonging and partnership".

(And after all, when you get right down to it, can anything really be more "equitable" and "inclusive" than nihilism?)

No, no, comrade...we will have new and better celebrations.

Like the annual Flinging of Turds.

https://x.com/CHUDMKVII/status/1852416956336615480



This is cultural enrichment...when your county fair is replaced by a mob of jeets slinging shit on each other.
 
They won't be satisfied until all humanity is just one big bland, generic, amorphous, homogeneous blob of "belonging and partnership".

One giant ball of seething polyglot humanity, with no past, no future and no hope, all mindlessly consuming, owning nothing, revolving on a endless rat wheel of debt, fake money and easy credit terms.

Isn't the future glorious comrade?
 
No, no, comrade...we will have new and better celebrations.

Like the annual Flinging of Turds.

[...]

That, too, shall pass, once it has served its purpose and is itself deemed insufficiently "diverse" and "inclusive" (or whatever other pleasant-sounding but empty verbiage is in fashion at the time).

One giant ball of seething polyglot humanity, with no past, no future and no hope, all mindlessly consuming, owning nothing, revolving on a endless rat wheel of debt, fake money and easy credit terms.

Isn't the future glorious comrade?

Indeed it is, comrade.

Onward, ho!
 
So, honest question, how DO you "not comply", specifically, with something like this?

Presumably they can get their hands on a 3d printer and machining tools?

But they won't, for all the same reasons that got them to where they're at to begin with.
 
The Biden administration has admitted that 13,100 KNOWN convicted murderer illegal aliens came in through the open borders since 2021. Over 14,000 known rapists. Of course , the true numbers are much higher. I wonder how many of those may be serial killers -- I know one from Honduras (?) was arrested recently, he killed 11 there, I think. I've heard you can't enter Canada from the USA if you have an arrest for DUI -- but, you can enter the USA with a murder conviction, make a false 'asylum' claim, and gets lots of free stuff.

At least if Trump wins tomorrow, I'm sure those names will be going onto a deportation list. Kamala wins, they will probably all get a new $5000 debit card and many more will be welcomed. Trump should have been running ads as much as possible hammering on this, and other issues related to this invasion Kamala Harris has helped orchestrate. This is beyond insane -- I'm not a huge Trump fan, I wish we had some one more like Ron Paul in his place -- but, Trump is our last hope.
 
Last edited:
This is beyond insane -- I'm not a huge Trump fan, I wish we had some one more like Ron Paul in his place -- but, Trump is our last hope.

Ron Paul will be in place in a new Trump administration.

It's unrealistic, at almost 90 years of age to expect him to take on the role of president, but the input and influence he has agreed to and been promised, is enough by itself to vote Trump, as far as I'm concerned.
 
Back
Top