Internet Catches Texas Senate Altering Timestamp on Abortion Bill Vote

can iz killz tha baybees nowz?

Yup!

You too can move to Texas, maybe even get a job pulling partially developed parts of children from mothers who don't want them....

[edit]

Just think of how every time you plunked a severed arm or leg into the trash bucket how you'd be protecting these women..

Every time the hose slurped and gurgled with brain tissue headed for the collection tank these folks will be so grateful!

Government too! A substantial portion of your paycheck would come from the taxpayer coffers, so not only are you helping women you're supporting a benevolent government...
 
Last edited:
And just how many of those pictured would you impregnate? :eek:

Yeah, most of them seem to be lacking in the scientifically proven 7:10 ratio that men find sexually attractive. That is a waistline 70% the size of the hips. :D
 
So because you think the bill should have passed, it was justified for them to alter the timestamp? Is that what I'm seeing here? Same type of tactics used in the conventions against the Paul delegates? Not to interrupt your conversation making fun of the way people look.
 
Last edited:
The bill was deemed to have not passed, and there will be a special session to pass it and a couple others on July 1.

Like I said in the other thread, Illinois does this all the time, but it never makes the news because Illinois is a blue state. It is about time that the GOP started using a few of their bully tactic against them.
 
No Angela, two wrongs do not make a right because the Repubs will and have used similar tactics against liberty peope. There are specific rules of order that all participants are expected to observe.
 
No Angela, two wrongs do not make a right because the Repubs will and have used similar tactics against liberty peope. There are specific rules of order that all participants are expected to observe.


I have no moral issues with using their tactics against them when the time comes, either. If we don't, we'll never win.

Make no mistake, I hate liberals. I don't care what it takes to quash them.
 
So you have no problem violating rules of order as long as it justifies your position? Why even have them then? How about everyone just show up with baseball bats and last man standing wins? If you are saying the only way to win is by cheating then you have bigger problems than issues.
 
Last edited:
So you have no problem violating rules of order as long as it justifies your position? Why even have them then? How about everyone just show up with baseball bats and last man standing wins?


That's what it's going to come to anyway. No point in pretending otherwise.

The rules only matter when both sides play by them. The socialists will not hesitate to put a bullet in your head to make you stop crying about violating the rules.
 
Last edited:
If you ever achieve your goal, try to remember to revisit your position then, and see if it hasn't changed.

I don't see any connection between these future planned pregnancies and unwanted unplanned pregnancies.

and I'm always deeply offended by the "just wait til you get older, you'll feel differently" bullshit.

I haven't changed any of my political positions over the years. I doubt I ever will. This issue is close to my heart, closer than most.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't expect you to be able to appreciate an unwanted pregnancy, as you'll never be pregnant.

No, you just want the government to enforce your own personal ethics.

Lookie here pip-squeek, I simply offered you perspective based on experience and once again you try and ascribe thoughts and behaviors to me that I haven't voiced.

Get this through your thick skull;

I do not want government enforcing or paying for anything to do with fetuses/children/single mothers or intact families.

In my opinion the federal governments roles are very clearly spelled out in the constitution
 
Lookie here pip-squeek, I simply offered you perspective based on experience and once again you try and ascribe thoughts and behaviors to me that I haven't voiced.

Get this through your thick skull;

I do not want government enforcing or paying for anything to do with fetuses/children/single mothers or intact families.

In my opinion the federal governments roles are very clearly spelled out in the constitution
Ok, so you're only personally against abortion, you don't want to change any laws - just minds?
 
I wouldn't expect you to be able to appreciate an unwanted pregnancy, as you'll never be pregnant.

No, you just want the government to enforce your own personal ethics.

Someone who doesn't want to be pregnant should be able to figure that out before 20 weeks go by.
 
Ayn Rand also hated gays. I guess you should too.

Rand was one of the earliest defenders of the nascent LGBT movement.

Someone who doesn't want to be pregnant should be able to figure that out before 20 weeks go by.
I concur. Still, situations exist that make sense of such a late abortion.

For instance, if a woman is so poor - she can't actually pay for an abortion. Or if she can't arrange transit to another state. Or she finds out much later than most (I mean, there are those shows on TV where the woman didn't even know she was pregnant to begin with)

Considering the fact that most women who obtain abortions don't know Jack Shit about their bodies, is it any surprise they stupidly wait til 20-21 weeks? We should condemn them, but not send them to prison.
 
Last edited:
Ok, so you're only personally against abortion, you don't want to change any laws - just minds?

Oh yes I do want to "change laws"!

I could start by repealing the last 50 years worth, give it a decade, if society didn't iron itself out repeal the previous 50 years worth!

This idea of writing "new and improved" legislation doesn't seem to be working well for anybody but government employees and lawyers.
 
Back
Top