revolutionary8
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2008
- Messages
- 3,662
yep. thatta bout sums it up.his voting record "has been GREAT" cause he's
not been voting

yep. thatta bout sums it up.his voting record "has been GREAT" cause he's
not been voting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag-k...barr2008.com/2008/07/14/video-barr-on-cavuto/
Barr, a "true libertarian" advocating government intervention in the Fannie Mae subprime mess. Yes Bob, you're right, I don't own a home, but I, and every other citizen in the united states should pay for this mess that the government and these crooked brokers created with more bail-outs, clearly that is the libertarian thing to do, and to say. In a real free market system it should only be the investors and the company that takes the hit, but no, in this case you still have execs walking away with millions in golden parachutes, and YOU, YOU will pay for it. Bob Barr is of course in agreement as any good big government neocon, patriot act traitor would be.
Yes, he wants to "intervene" and privatize FM and FM....
http://www.bobbarr2008.com/press/pr...mae-and-freddie-mac-end-government-subsidies/
Sounds good to me.
Importance? ZERO! <IMHO>
You're just dreamin'.<IMHO>importance 0? or are you talking the fm???. barr in the debates will be huge ,look if it wasn't for a 3rd party candidate harry browne many years ago. i would of never listened to Ron Paul ,so i truly think barr being in the debates will open many eyes and never say never on poll numbers ,if we get barr into the debates, then many more people will have their eyes opened and all the folks that feel they have no voice will be energized, never say never, so i assume you meant 0 on the fm subject and not the debates. Barr is gonna hand obama and mccain their asses on a silver platter in a debate ,will be great ,let's get barrr in the debate or unify the parties under a new platform , we must do something!!!
You're just dreamin'.<IMHO>![]()
You're just dreamin'.<IMHO>![]()
Don't tell me that its a waste. I'm voting from my heart. I will only vote Chuck Baldwin if Ron Paul endorses him and I do not think he will.
Do you think Barr can even get elected? I mean fuck of course that is what Barr supporters would ideally like in a perfect world, but most Barr supporters I think know how unrealistic that is....
For just a moment lets focus on the present and whats right around the corner:
-Barr supporters want to see him get 10% in the polls nationally
-so he can participate in debates with McBama.
-For the run of his present campagin, Barr HAS been preaching Libertarian ideals.
-Therefor he would not just flip-flop in a debate with McBama, but would counter their big government statist ideas with Libertarian ones.
Don't you want average Americans to learn that there is an alternative to runaway spending, high taxes, crazy interventionist foreign policy, etc? Or do you want to see Obama and McCain stand alone on a stage, contesting minor details about their plans to further aggrandize the state and fuck all of us over?
Just picture that for me. McCain looking like a baboon and pretending to be conservative, Obama pretending to stand for change and preaching the virtues of socialism.
To most Americans, these two men will seem to be only two routes American can take. Now what would it look like if Barr entered the picture, and presented the case of limited government and maximum liberty?
Stop trying to preemptively crap all over Barr, support him getting into the debates and see what you think of him then. There is value in opening up the two party system up to a third party.
With all due respect, I would say you're the moron if you really
think barr's message is anything like Ron Paul's message.
Pornography, at best, is a distortion of the true nature of sex created by God for the procreative union between one man and one woman in the holy bonds of matrimony, and at worst, is a destructive element of society resulting in significant and real emotional, physical, spiritual and financial costs to individuals, families and communities. We call on our local, state and federal governments to uphold our cherished First Amendment right to free speech by vigorously enforcing our laws against obscenity to maintain a degree of separation between that which is truly speech and that which only seeks to distort and destroy.
Gambling promotes an increase in crime, destruction of family values, and a decline in the moral fiber of our country. We are opposed to government sponsorship, involvement in, or promotion of gambling, such as lotteries, or subsidization of Native American casinos in the name of economic development.
We affirm the value of the father and the mother in the home, and we oppose efforts to legalize adoption of children by homosexual singles or couples.
Joseph, I'm sorry, but you really are a complete moron for wanting to write in Paul and for not seeing the opportunity of SPREADING OUR MESSAGE if Barr makes the debates.
EDIT: I don't like Barr too much for his voting record but that's completely irrelevant because he will not win the election. All that matters is the debates and even if he's lying about it, talking about libertarian views on those debates will wake up MANY people to the philosophy of freedom. That's the only reason I support him.
OK then, let's compare..
This is Chuck Baldwin's philosophy - tell me how these statements represent Ron Paul's ideology of freedom and liberty. Please, tell me.