Immigration & Welfare

If Immigrants Received No Welfare, I Would...


  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed .
So then the problem isn't the religion itself, but the environment where the people are living, right? And attitudes change when environment changes? And even third world Muslims abroad are mostly fine on the important issues (like, not exterminating non-Muslims, as in the hysterical vision of certain anti-immigrant groups).
Not if you let in too many too fast, then they change the environment.
 
Not if you let in too many too fast, then they change the environment.

We'll just let in an equal number of Mexicans.. :)

But seriously, the Muslim population in the US is about 1%, and people are losing their minds over Muslim immigration in the tens of thousands per year - ridiculous. And, even if Muslim immigration did outpace assimilation, it's not the apocalypse. Contrary to the hysterical propaganda, we're not going to wake up one day beheaded and crucified. Worst case scenario, you get the kind of ethnic tensions that existed around the turn of the century (rising to the level of minor nuisance in the grand scheme of things) and a turn toward social conservatism (which most of the anti-immigrant folks favor anyway, oddly enough).

Now, Europe is in a different and more dangerous situation (not apocalypse either, but more terrorism), since they already have fairly large Muslim populations who failed to assimilate because of the welfare ghetto strategy the idiot (non-Muslim) leadership pursued. Don't repeat their mistakes, and we'll be fine.
 
Last edited:
We'll just let in an equal number of Mexicans.. :)

But seriously, the Muslim population in the US is about 1%, and people are losing their minds over Muslim immigration in the tens of thousands per year - ridiculous. And, even if Muslim immigration did outpace assimilation, it's not the apocalypse. Contrary to the hysterical propaganda, we're not going to wake up one day beheaded and crucified. Worst case scenario, you get the kind of ethnic tensions that existed around the turn of the century (rising to the level of minor nuisance in the grand scheme of things) and a turn toward social conservatism (which most of the anti-immigrant folks favor anyway, oddly enough).

Now, Europe is in a different and more dangerous situation (not apocalypse either, but more terrorism), since they already have fairly large Muslim populations who failed to assimilate because of the welfare ghetto strategy the idiot (non-Muslim) leadership pursued. Don't repeat their mistakes, and we'll be fine.

If you really are afraid of NAZIs and Know Nothings, then you must have moderate immigration controls.
You can call them stupid, you can call them feral, or you can say it is an over-reaction to a legitimate instinct, but one way or another; people will react this way to excessive immigration.
You have seen my thread where I speculate that Europe has let in too many muslims too fast in order to provoke this kind of reaction, NAZI types feed on culture shock, without culture shock they can't recruit a statistically significant following let alone a majority.
 
We'll just let in an equal number of Mexicans.. :)

But seriously, the Muslim population in the US is about 1%, and people are losing their minds over Muslim immigration in the tens of thousands per year - ridiculous. And, even if Muslim immigration did outpace assimilation, it's not the apocalypse. Contrary to the hysterical propaganda, we're not going to wake up one day beheaded and crucified. Worst case scenario, you get the kind of ethnic tensions that existed around the turn of the century (rising to the level of minor nuisance in the grand scheme of things) and a turn toward social conservatism (which most of the anti-immigrant folks favor anyway, oddly enough).

Now, Europe is in a different and more dangerous situation (not apocalypse either, but more terrorism), since they already have fairly large Muslim populations who failed to assimilate because of the welfare ghetto strategy the idiot (non-Muslim) leadership pursued. Don't repeat their mistakes, and we'll be fine.

Are our rulers familiar with a concept called moderation?:rolleyes:
 
I expect American Indians can agree with that.
And we should not make the same mistake.

If you really are afraid of NAZIs and Know Nothings, then you must have moderate immigration controls.
You can call them stupid, you can call them feral, or you can say it is an over-reaction to a legitimate instinct, but one way or another; people will react this way to excessive immigration.
You have seen my thread where I speculate that Europe has let in too many muslims too fast in order to provoke this kind of reaction, NAZI types feed on culture shock, without culture shock they can't recruit a statistically significant following let alone a majority.
 
And we should not make the same mistake.

If you really are afraid of NAZIs and Know Nothings, then you must have moderate immigration controls.
You can call them stupid, you can call them feral, or you can say it is an over-reaction to a legitimate instinct, but one way or another; people will react this way to excessive immigration.
You have seen my thread where I speculate that Europe has let in too many muslims too fast in order to provoke this kind of reaction, NAZI types feed on culture shock, without culture shock they can't recruit a statistically significant following let alone a majority.

The Brits came here specifically to destroy the indigenous people and take their land. Most immigrants come here searching for a better life- not to murder the inhabitants.

As far as Europe goes- stop killing people in the ME and destroying their countries- then immigration won't be a problem.
 
The Brits came here specifically to destroy the indigenous people and take their land. Most immigrants come here searching for a better life- not to murder the inhabitants.

As far as Europe goes- stop killing people in the ME and destroying their countries- then immigration won't be a problem.

The Mexicans Plan on "Re-Conquering" the south west, you will say that not all of them do, but not all European settlers planed on destroying the indigenous people and taking their land.
 
If you really are afraid of NAZIs and Know Nothings, then you must have moderate immigration controls.
You can call them stupid, you can call them feral, or you can say it is an over-reaction to a legitimate instinct, but one way or another; people will react this way to excessive immigration.
You have seen my thread where I speculate that Europe has let in too many muslims too fast in order to provoke this kind of reaction, NAZI types feed on culture shock, without culture shock they can't recruit a statistically significant following let alone a majority.

Implement nativist policies in order to prevent the nativists from gaining power and implementing nativist policies.

...makes sense.

I do appreciate your point, though. If one day I wake up and the options are NAZI coup d'etat or further immigration restrictions, the choice is obvious. But in the meantime, there's no need to concede anything to those misfits. It's the time rather to oppose them vigorously or - at the very least - not to cheer them on: to prevent that day from ever coming where they're strong and radicalized enough to stage that coup.
 
If you really are afraid of NAZIs and Know Nothings, then you must have moderate immigration controls.
You can call them stupid, you can call them feral, or you can say it is an over-reaction to a legitimate instinct, but one way or another; people will react this way to excessive immigration.
You have seen my thread where I speculate that Europe has let in too many muslims too fast in order to provoke this kind of reaction, NAZI types feed on culture shock, without culture shock they can't recruit a statistically significant following let alone a majority.

Implement nativist policies in order to prevent the nativists from gaining power and implementing nativist policies.

...makes sense.

I do appreciate your point, though. If one day I wake up and the options are NAZI coup d'etat or further immigration restrictions, the choice is obvious. But in the meantime, there's no need to concede anything to those misfits. It's the time rather to oppose them vigorously or - at the very least - not to cheer them on: to prevent that day from ever coming where they're strong and radicalized enough to stage that coup.

Just because too much of something is bad, does not mean any of it is bad, drink too much water and you die, drink too little water and you die.
Too much immigration control is bad, too little is bad.
We are seeing as much "Nativism" as we are because of the flood of immigrants both legal and illegal that the "Liberals" have drowned the country in for decades.
Open the borders all the way and you will see exponential growth in Neo-Know Nothings and the KKK and NAZIs.
 
Open the borders all the way and you will see exponential growth in Neo-Know Nothings and the KKK and NAZIs.

The actual number of immigrants entering the country has virtually nothing to do with anti-immigrant sentiment. The people who fear an imminent ISIS revolution in America have likely never met a single Muslim and have no idea how many are in the country. Muslim immigration has had no effect whatsoever on their lives. It's what's on TV, not what's occurring in reality.
 
Last edited:
The actual number of immigrants entering the country has virtually nothing to do with anti-immigrant sentiment. The people who fear an imminent ISIS revolution in America have likely never never met a single Muslim and have no idea how many are in the country. Muslim immigration has had no effect whatsoever on their lives. It's what's on TV, not what's occurring in reality.
They would not be so easy to manipulate if the stage had not been set with millions of hispanic/asian illegals, and a general flood of 2nd and 3rd world legal immigrants.
 
They would not be so easy to manipulate if the stage had not been set with millions of hispanic/asian illegals, and a general flood of 2nd and 3rd world legal immigrants.

That sentiment too was a result of media manipulation.

Where was immigration on the political radar until FOX covered a few sensational crimes by illegals 24/7 over the summer of 2015?

That's what got people hopped up in the first place, and was probably the single largest factor in putting Trump in the White House.

...their previous coverage of ISIS being #2.
 
That sentiment too was a result of media manipulation.

Where was immigration on the political radar until FOX covered a few sensational crimes by illegals 24/7 over the summer of 2015?

That's what got people hopped up in the first place, and was probably the single largest factor in putting Trump in the White House.

...their previous coverage of ISIS being #2.
Conservatives have been complaining about illegal immigration for decades, the Reagan amnesty was supposed to be followed by better enforcement if you remember.
 
Conservatives have been complaining about illegal immigration for decades, the Reagan amnesty was supposed to be followed by better enforcement if you remember.

Sure, but it only (re)appeared as a top issue after a media campaign tailored to the purpose.

Trump won the nomination on anti-immigrant rhetoric that was on the fringe within the party a few years ago.
 
Sure, but it only (re)appeared as a top issue after a media campaign tailored to the purpose.

Trump won the nomination on anti-immigrant rhetoric that was on the fringe within the party a few years ago.
And it would not have been possible if the issue had not been created and allowed to fester for decades, the war on "terrorism" distracted people from all domestic issues since 9/11, that does not mean that immigration did not simmer in the collective sub-conscious in the mean time, just waiting to be manipulated when some faction wanted to use it.
 
We'll just let in an equal number of Mexicans.. :)

But seriously, the Muslim population in the US is about 1%, and people are losing their minds over Muslim immigration in the tens of thousands per year - ridiculous. And, even if Muslim immigration did outpace assimilation, it's not the apocalypse. Contrary to the hysterical propaganda, we're not going to wake up one day beheaded and crucified. Worst case scenario, you get the kind of ethnic tensions that existed around the turn of the century (rising to the level of minor nuisance in the grand scheme of things) and a turn toward social conservatism (which most of the anti-immigrant folks favor anyway, oddly enough).

Now, Europe is in a different and more dangerous situation (not apocalypse either, but more terrorism), since they already have fairly large Muslim populations who failed to assimilate because of the welfare ghetto strategy the idiot (non-Muslim) leadership pursued. Don't repeat their mistakes, and we'll be fine.


Or we can keep them out and avoid the risk all together.
 
It is everybody's Nation. It was created by immigrants and built by immigrants. My ancestors have been in the US at least as long as the Revolutionary war. We nearly all descend from immigrants. If immigrants are bad, we should all leave. Without immigration, almost none of us would be here and instead living in socialist Europe. If you do not like it here, you are certainly free to live someplace else.


No, the Founders who created America were not "immigrants" they were the decedents of settlers.

"If immigrants are so bad, we all should leave", please keep the autism going, its sadly funny.
 
Back
Top