phill4paul
Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Messages
- 46,967
They let him off in the hopes that a white supremacist will hunt him down. He shouldn't be celebrating.
They may supply the "white supremacist".They let him off in the hopes that a white supremacist will hunt him down. He shouldn't be celebrating.
You're already into a bet so I won't poison the well. But the key will be to see whether Smollett is right back into the script, clean as a whistle, or whether he's still off the show moving forward.
Feds are investigating the aspirin he sent to himself but they have not as yet filed any charges. https://pagesix.com/2019/03/26/jussie-smollet-could-still-face-federal-charges/
No kidding...and if there had been two unlucky bastards walking by, they would have been cuffed, stuffed and thrown into the feral rape cage, where I reckon they would not have survived a year.
I dunno, seems like he has a pretty clear libel case. Unlike many fake libel cases, he has concrete damages that resulted from media coverage:
https://www.thewrap.com/empire-return-ratings-tank-jussie-smollett-arrested/
As AF has repeatedly said, that needs repeating, go back and read this whole thread. Had this joker not been filmed and caught in his lies, he could have fingered innocent parties. And the media would have made their lives miserable. Just like abuse charges or rape charges. One charged is guilty from the get go. And their names are published, and guns confiscated without due process.
He got off because he was doing "community service" for Jesse Jackson's shakedown outfit. Chicago is every bit as corrupt as it's ever been.
He got off because he was doing "community service" for Jesse Jackson's shakedown outfit. Chicago is every bit as corrupt as it's ever been.
They'll probably figure he sent them to himself, in case he got a headache and they got crushed in the mail.Feds are investigating the aspirin he sent to himself but they have not as yet filed any charges. https://pagesix.com/2019/03/26/jussie-smollet-could-still-face-federal-charges/
Same court gave me 25 hours for going through a malfunctioning railroad crossing on a bike. Let two black guys go for the same 'crime' at the same time (we all got the tickets in the same place at the same time). Judge bumped me to the end of the docket, too, so I had to wait 3 hours in court to catch that %^&*(ing. I'm feeling pretty indignant about all this...
"I’m completely confused. I don’t understand. I don’t know. I don’t know the underlying evidence. There’s a sealed document, obviously. I don’t know. I’m at a loss," Harris said during an interview on CNN's "The Situation Room."...
...During her interview on CNN, Harris added that she thinks "we’re going to have to leave it up to the judgment of the prosecutor."
"I think we should leave it up to the judgment of the police chief and the mayor, of course, to give us some better sense of what’s going on. I don’t know," she added.
Harris drew headlines in January after condemning what she called "an attempted modern day lynching" after Smollett claimed that two men attacked him, put a noose around his neck and poured a chemical substance on him while yelling racial and homophobic slurs at him.
"sad, frustrated, and disappointed" after police in Chicago accused Smollett of staging the alleged attack.
"When anyone makes false claims to police, it not only diverts resources away from serious investigations but it makes it more difficult for other victims of crime to come forward,” she said in a statement at the time.
"At the same time, we must speak the truth: hate crimes are on the rise in America," she added.
"At the same time, we must speak the truth: hate crimes are on the rise in America," she added.
This makes me suspect that Harris is somehow involved, that Smollet did it to promote her and/or her "anti-lyinching" bill, that Kim Foxx, et al, know this, and that's why they just want documents sealed and the whole thing swept under the rug.
(3/26/19 07:32 PM) https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...says-shes-completely-confused-on-the-smollett
She had plenty of confidence in her statements, back when she was making claims about a hate crime.
Even after it was determined to have been a hoax.
Assistant State's Attorney Joe Magats said that even though he does not believe the star is innocent, his office had suddenly decided not to pursue charges because Smollett has a 'lack of criminal background' and was not a threat to the community.
He would have been a threat to some hapless innocent white people if his plan had not fallen apart.