They give results for
1) Republican
2) Democratic
and
3) Statewide
1) and 2) were their own, local/regional reporting
3) was quoting the Associated Press.
I have no idea exactly what you're talking about, except that this local paper
is not particularly well written.
You're looking at what you have up there, that photo, that screen capture and we're supposed to think that those "republican caucus results" actually
aren't local results at all. No, you think we should think, those are the real statewide results, but they were too good for Ron Paul. So, this paper said "oh
shit, we are going to have to cover up these real statewide results somehow,
maybe by calling them Spokane results"
You think that's what happened, don't you?
Listen, there were 3 bolded categories
Republican Caucus Results
Democratic Caucus Results
Statewide Caucus Results
Why would they have different categories for Republican Caucus Results and Statewide Caucus Results if they were supposed to be the same?
Did you graduate from High School?
But that is NOT what they reported to begin with. They added the Spokane LATER...
Seems a LITTLE odd, no?
Well, I guess it wouldn't unless you were aware of the publications "usual habits":
If you look at these links (
1 -
2 -
3) you will see that this site does not normally apply local coverage ambiguously at all. In fact, they almost name the damned sreet that they are reporting on...
Again, seems a LITTLE odd...