The Patriot Act is a prime example of the benefits of a free market economy, just like the Internal Revenue Service.Actually, they are an example of the free market at work, Jim.
The Patriot Act is a prime example of the benefits of a free market economy, just like the Internal Revenue Service.Actually, they are an example of the free market at work, Jim.
The Patriot Act is a prime example of the benefits of a free market economy, just like the Internal Revenue Service.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...ng-von-Mises&p=3335881&viewfull=1#post3335881"I'm working the facebook angle for Bachmann, swaying Paul and Palin supporters into her camp. We'll see the principle of leadership in action taking place in many online grassroots forum initiatives. "
Actually, they are an example of the free market at work, Jim.
LE, I'd expect better than for you to bite that lure.
I don't agree. The whole point of the moneybombs is to build momentum that leads to all kinds of people donating way more than they ever would have before and some even donating that had never planned to at all. In the past, some people donated who hardly knew Dr. Paul, but got caught up in the excitement. If we cannot build that momentum, then there really is no purpose for even doing moneybombs any longer.
And for the record, it's fairly well known amongst the people who were around during the last campaign, that just throwing in an intermediate moneybomb can have devastating effects on the moneybomb close to it. We saw that last time when the unilateral decision was made to toss in another MB right before what was building to be a huge Tea Party moneybomb. When that additional MB was tossed in, the excitement that had been building for the Tea Party moneybomb went completely flat. Sure, we still raised a great deal of money, but man, imagine what we could have done. It was a very costly incident.
moneybombs are the least of our problem, We are battling a gop that will do anything in its power to make sure the best candidate(Ron Paul) doesn't win the gop nomination.
moneybombs are the least of our problem, We are battling a gop that will do anything in its power to make sure the best candidate(Ron Paul) doesn't win the gop nomination.
... for those who believe having two money bombs within 14 days of each other is a huge mistake, my suggestion would be to contact the campaign and tell them your concerns. ...
email debbie hopper (debh at ronpaul2012.com). ...
bern's email to debbie said:hi debbie,
over the last week or so, i have been reading a bit about the different factions trying to create and promote fundraisers for the rp12 campaign.
I am becoming a bit concerned about the schism because it seems to me that the main stream media (msm) likes to take advantage of every opportunity to spin news for ron paul's efforts in a bad light and setting up two money bombs two weeks apart is guaranteeing that one will have dissappointing results.
Should the rp12 campaign issue any emails, press releases, statements, etc. Supporting one or both and choose one that generates disappointing results, i can almost guarantee that it will "earn" negative media. That would be hugely counterproductive in shoring up arguments that ron "is electable" among the likely gop voters that i interact with and am attempting to educate and influence. It would be strongly counterproductive to the ultimate goal of winning votes (even if it does bring in a few extra dollars).
Please don't lose sight of the big picture.
I think you've either quoted the wrong person or you've misunderstood me; I HAVE said that I don't like moneybombs at short intervals.
The campaign needs money BEFORE the end of the filing deadline in Jul 1.
The campaign needs money BEFORE the end of the filing deadline in Jul 1.
The campaign needs money BEFORE the end of the filing deadline in Jul 1.