- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,493
Let's honestly analyze this situation please. Tewnty-five to thirty years ago, those of us who went to college, were going there because we WERE QUALIFIED and could afford it (either through parents, scholarships, and/or loans which which you had to have some ability to prove you could pay back).
Yeah, the whole student loan industry didn't exist back then. Very few people borrowed money to go to college. Your parents paid, or you made enough money to pay on your own. Where do college students work today to earn money for college? Many of those jobs are now permanently occupied by recent immigrants.
Now, government has had a big role too. Tax incentives for off-shoring and on-shoring does not help. It should not cost less (disregarding salary) to hire foreigners than Americans. I see it in IT.
To add to this, let me venture into the realm of "conspiracy". Pure crazy talk here.
Let's imagine that a group of people have a desire to deficit spend. We'll call them government. We can also imagine that these people will engage in inflating the money supply in order to keep the gravy train rolling. Let's imagine that the people given the task of solving this problem are at the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, and Wall St. Someone has an idea: price inflation only occurs when there is wage inflation. We can offset monetary inflation if we can reduce labor costs and wages. The Wall St boys say, "how about we import more workers of all kinds, we knew that reduces our costs, and it will help with your inflation concerns". Great idea! The Wall St. boys come back and say "that works so well, we can also send the work out of the country, that will reduce our cost even more, and work even better at preventing your inflation problem". Everybody wins (at least everybody in the room).
But hey, that's just crazy talk (except for the fact that Alan Greenspan has admitted that reduced labor costs was key to his inflation formula).