tod evans
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
- Messages
- 36,071
No, why would I be? I want government COMPLETELY OUT OF LOANS. no bankruptcy, no special rules, nobody is forced to loan anybody, let lenders make their own risk determination, just enforce contracts.
Weren't you arguing for letting debts discharge via bankruptcy (which is, in effect, forcing the lender to forgive a debt)? How is that letting 2 sides duke it out themselves?
You seem to be lumping governments role in lending/collecting money right in with their role as civil court administrators..
Bankruptcy law is strictly a civil matter and as such is under the courts jurisdiction, changing the bankruptcy laws is in my opinion a totally separate issue.
The only reason I brought up bankruptcy in relation to student loans is because of the recent laws that prohibit discharge. A student loan should be just as risky to the lender as any other unsecured loan and it should carry the appropriate interest rate to reflect the risk.
I could get behind repealing many of the recent changes to the bankruptcy code, but if there is going to be a bankruptcy code at all then student loans should be able to be discharged like any other debt.