How they'll set Trump up to be be installed as dictator

There are ways to find out.

Variety re: James Garner's memoir said:
“Too many actors have run for office,” he writes. “There’s one difference between me and them: I know I’m not qualified. In my opinion, Arnold Schwarzenegger wasn’t qualified to be governor of California. Ronald Reagan wasn’t qualified to be governor, let alone president. I was a vice president of the Screen Actors Guild when he was its president. My duties consisted of attending meetings and voting. The only thing I remember is that Ronnie never had an original thought and that we had to tell him what to say. That’s no way to run a union, let along a state or a country.”

Garner writes that he was asked to run for Congress in 1962 as a Republican, and “it didn’t stop them when I told them I was a Democrat. …They just thought I could win.” In 1990, Democratic leaders approached him about running for governor of California, but the discussion got to the issue of abortion and Garner says he answered, “I don’t have an opinion, because that’s up to the woman. It has nothing to do with me.” The conversation pretty much stopped there.

https://variety.com/2011/biz/opinio...reagan-other-actors-who-run-for-office-37170/

And there are ways to figure out which are deep state movers and shakers. Like the snapshot of Bush and Clinton sitting on bales of CIA drugs on the tarmac, smiling and laughing. And the fact that Hinckley was a mentally deficient childhood friend of Dubya. And Hillary's list of suicided associates.

In the television age, they've become the exceptions. Most of the lizards prefer to stay out of the spotlight, like roaches.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with the idea that an actor isn't qualified to be a part of a representative government. We largely have a group of professional politicians here that have little to no experience in the working work and the results of their running the government are piss poor in my opinion. I would argue that we would all be better off if D.C. was filled with plumbers, waitresses, truck drivers, and even actors. This method of governing by dual citizen lawyers is not impressive to me.

The Constitution isn't that difficult to understand and uphold.
 
I disagree with the idea that an actor isn't qualified to be a part of a representative government.

James Garner's opinion, not mine. And most of them would be piss poor, and/or mere puppets. Garner might have been an exception. But as a hophead and a cynic, a man who could act and loved the work, I think it's pretty clear that he didn't want the job. At all. For one thing, being a celebrity was his least favorite part of acting.

But, yes, the system was designed to be run by real people who know what it means to work for a living, not sociopaths who look good on TV and just adore fundraising. We need that. But I don't know how we can have it, unless there's a major paradigm shift right down in our grass roots.
 
Last edited:
What they want is the Constitution tossed in the dustbin history. Trump and Pelosi almost pulled that off, but Massie foiled the plan. Biden isn't getting that done.

Ask yourself this: Biden's just a lackey, right? And Hilldog Clinton is a bona fide deep state mover and shaker, right? What's more, of all the deep state club members, she's the most vain, and seems to love the spotlight the most, right? So when they stole 2020, why didn't they steal it for her? Why did they install this semi-conscious lackey fossil instead?

Do you think she'd volunteer to play a role that involves her convincing everyone she's stupid and incompetent, then getting shot without a stunt double?
Because the Deep State needed to usher in Covid lockdowns and Operation Warp Speed and Trump was the only one that would be able to get away with it. Under a Cliinton administration, the plan would have to be scrapped and they would instead start a conflict with Russia to usher in WW3. In fact, I'm fairly confident Covid would have never even made the news 4 years ago if she were president. With Trump at the helm, the plan is a lot more easier to implement. It also means Clinton gets to avoid any blame whatsoever for the medical fallout the Covid vaccines have caused.
 
Because the Deep State needed to usher in Covid lockdowns and Operation Warp Speed and Trump was the only one that would be able to get away with it.

Sounds right to me. But you're talking about 2016, and what you quoted was about 2020.
 
Because the Deep State needed to usher in Covid lockdowns and Operation Warp Speed and Trump was the only one that would be able to get away with it. Under a Cliinton administration, the plan would have to be scrapped and they would instead start a conflict with Russia to usher in WW3. In fact, I'm fairly confident Covid would have never even made the news 4 years ago if she were president. With Trump at the helm, the plan is a lot more easier to implement. It also means Clinton gets to avoid any blame whatsoever for the medical fallout the Covid vaccines have caused.

Sounds right to me. But you're talking about 2016, and what you quoted was about 2020.

LOL

Trump resisted, and nothing would have stopped Hitlery from doing any of it with enthusiasm, it all would have been much more aggressive.
 

That theory by Massie is total bunk.
If they had wanted to do that they would have done it.
And him trying to stop the bill from passing would only have helped them with it by "proving" that the Congress was unable to function in the "emergency".
 
Do you think Biden was a worse candidate than Hillary?

I think if Hillary had won, we'd be in a hot war with Russia.

Actually, the war would be over by now, and we wouldn't be having this conversation, because we'd all be glowing puddles of radioactive goo.

Having said that, they seem to be doing everything they can do to provoke the bear, even under Biden. But . . . I can't exactly blame Biden for what's going on now, given his mental state. He is the epitome of a puppet. For all we know, Hillary is pulling the strings.
 
Last edited:
If they had done it, but not by the book, they'd have faced a backlash. Just because you'd have licked their boots doesn't mean men would have.

They weren't doing it by the book. (they weren't doing it at all but if they were it wasn't by the book)
And Massie's action would only have helped them to do it by the book if they had wanted to .
Massie just created a fantasy so he could cast himself as a hero who save the day.
 
(they weren't doing it at all but if they were it wasn't by the book)
And Massie's action would only have helped them to do it by the book if they had wanted to .

You've clearly never even read the book. I can't tell if you've ever read any book.
 
I think if Hillary had won, we'd be in a hot war with Russia.

Actually, the war would be over by now, and we wouldn't be having this conversation, because we'd all be glowing puddles of radioactive goo.

Having said that, they seem to be doing everything they can do to provoke the bear, even under Biden. But . . . I can't exactly blame Biden for what's going on now, given his mental state. He is the epitome of a puppet. For all we know, Hillary is pulling the strings.

I meant politically worse, as in less electable.

IMHO, Hillary was a horrible candidate. The Dems could hardly have done worse than her no matter who they nominated. Biden in 2020 was not weighed down by the same level of shear unlikability that Hillary in 2016 had.

Now in 2024, it may be a different story. Public perception of Biden has gone down quite a bit.
 
But I said the plan was to obviously steal the election for Biden again, then use the backlash to install Trump dictator.

So, who's trying to sell you the notion that their plan is for Trump to be declared the "winner" of the "election"?

In order for this plan to work, Biden must be about as popular as a bag of coughed up hairballs when he's declared the "winner" of another "election".

They want us to think we threw the big babies of the Deep State out with Bathwater Biden. But the big babies of the Deep State will still be with us, because Trump is just fresh bathwater.

They'll probably shoot Biden dead live on national teevee just to convince you. But but but Biden's a loyal lackey and they wouldn't blah blah blah!! They're psychopaths, eugenicists and humanists who worship only their own brains. They just "culled the herd" of millions of souls. They're telling each other it's a mercy killing of a guy whose brain is failing, so he obviously can't be happy any more. Oh, they don't want to make their other loyal lackeys nervous. So it'll obviously be quick and painless. Wait and see.

I know you don't want to try to think the way these creatures do. It's not a fun activity, believe me. But somebody has to, or we'll never escape the trap they have all set for us.

If the system is going to go through all this trouble to kill Biden after making a horse's ass out of him, then why install Trump, who is old and a pain in the ass to their ambitions?

Why not install a young, charismatic and persuasive person, preferably of color, to lead their agenda as dictator for life? As much of the country that supports Trump, would be in favor of that, especially in blue states and big cities.

I really feel like you are over-thinking this.
 
If the system is going to go through all this trouble to kill Biden after making a horse's ass out of him, then why install Trump, who is old and a pain in the ass to their ambitions?

Why not install a young, charismatic and persuasive person, preferably of color, to lead their agenda as dictator for life? As much of the country that supports Trump, would be in favor of that, especially in blue states and big cities.

I really feel like you are over-thinking this.

Because Trump can do it.

We're not talking about a job just anyone can do, here. Trump's got to be as appealing as Reagan, and as Teflon. Even Trump, charismatic as he is, has to work at it.

Where's the advantage in a young Big Brother? Once the Constitution is gone, your Big Brother is just someone who can cause you trouble if he gets too big for his britches. Where's the downside to a figurehead about whom you can say, he died of old age? And what does "persuasive" mean? Erudite? You'd stick someone erudite up in front of the people who reelected Dubya? Where's the percentage in that?

Preferably of color. Jesus Christ, man. You certainly can't be accused of overthinking this thing. Give it a try one time. News flash: This thing is designed to be won by the side who has all the guns and knows how to use them (unlike these "47 shell casings were found and three people in a crowd of a thousand were injured" gangbangers). That's you, man. Now do a little overthinking of your own and tell me why they didn't use a person of color.
 
Last edited:
If the system is going to go through all this trouble to kill Biden after making a horse's ass out of him, then why install Trump, who is old and a pain in the ass to their ambitions?

Why not install a young, charismatic and persuasive person, preferably of color, to lead their agenda as dictator for life? As much of the country that supports Trump, would be in favor of that, especially in blue states and big cities.

I really feel like you are over-thinking this.

For sure he is over thinking it. Newson is the ideal dictator. Acptulsa makes simple things more complicated than they really are. The swamp hates and fears Trump pure and simple. They don't trust him.
 
The swamp hates and fears Trump pure and simple.

Then why do they talk about him all the time? Why is he He Who Must Be Named?

Compare his free publicity to Dubya's the previous two years. Don't tell me it's just because he held the office.

How soon we forget what our experience promoting Ron Paul showed us. This psyop isn't Simple and it certainly isn't Pure. I can't believe this corporate consortium is throwing the freaking Book of Revelation at you and you're still expecting Pure and Simple.
 
Last edited:
For sure he is over thinking it. Newson is the ideal dictator. Acptulsa makes simple things more complicated than they really are. The swamp hates and fears Trump pure and simple. They don't trust him.

Count me in with [MENTION=12430]acptulsa[/MENTION]

The very idea that the swamp hates Trump is simply far-far-fetched and completely ludicrous. He has furthered their agendas to the T. Every solution that he spews in public is completely statist [not a single one has ever been liberty-oriented], and every bill that he signed cost the Americans mountains more in dollars and freedom and lined the pockets of the industrialists.
 
The very idea that the swamp hates Trump is simply far-far-fetched and completely ludicrous. He has furthered their agendas to the T. Every solution that he spews in public is completely statist [not a single one has ever been liberty-oriented], and every bill that he signed cost the Americans mountains more in dollars and freedom and lined the pockets of the industrialists.

And perhaps most importantly to the Swamp at the moment, his grubby paws are dripping with The Jab. He won't be conducting any Nuremberg Trials over that Mengele-style mRNA experiment.

Meanwhile that's just almost the only platform plank RFKJr hasn't wavered on one inch. He promises he will. And I want that.

Will RFKJr implement carbon tax? What will he do to abortion? He'll spend most of his time dodging bullets, I expect. What he can accomplish in between I can't say, but if crucifying Fauci is half as high on his priority list as he lets on, then he's the man.
 
Last edited:
I meant politically worse, as in less electable.

IMHO, Hillary was a horrible candidate. The Dems could hardly have done worse than her no matter who they nominated. Biden in 2020 was not weighed down by the same level of shear unlikability that Hillary in 2016 had.

Now in 2024, it may be a different story. Public perception of Biden has gone down quite a bit.

Yet, Hillary won the popular vote. They failed to adequately account for the electoral college. They didn't make that mistake again in 2020.

On the contrary, Biden was immensely unpopular despite the MSM's efforts to shore up run his campaign, which is why they had to flip several 'swing' states in the wee hours of the morning, day after election.



They don't do this just so they can throw away their hard-cheated victory 4 years later. I'm sorry.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top