acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 75,559
(1) Because Michael Malice is not a forum member.
Oh.
That's a point.
(1) Because Michael Malice is not a forum member.
Yeah, I know where you're stuck at. Theye're counting on that.
Good luck with that in this day and age.
He knows that he can do whatever he wants.
—Which is why I still just can't quite buy into the notion that the big plan is to get Trump re-elected. That's 'going around your a** to get to your elbow.'
And more importantly, TPTB know that they can get whatever they want, through him.
What they want is the Constitution tossed in the dustbin history. Trump and Pelosi almost pulled that off, but Massie foiled the plan.
Starts at 21 minutes 10 seconds:
How they'll set Trump up to be be installed as dictator...
![]()
J6.2.0 this time with Marines.
I have so many question as to how this will work.
What they want is the Constitution tossed in the dustbin history. Trump and Pelosi almost pulled that off, but Massie foiled the plan. Biden isn't getting that done.
Ask yourself this: Biden's just a lackey, right? And Hilldog Clinton is a bona fide deep state mover and shaker, right? What's more, of all the deep state club members, she's the most vain, and seems to love the spotlight the most, right? So when they stole 2020, why didn't they steal it for her? Why did they install this semi-conscious lackey fossil instead?
Do you think she'd volunteer to play a role that involves her convincing everyone she's stupid and incompetent, then getting shot without a stunt double?
Your neighbors will demand it.
Well, the basis of your argument rests on your belief that they somehow didn't want Hillary, rather than underestimating Trump. If that's the foundation that you've established for your theory, then yes, I could see how it seems illogical.
If you noticed, they made all the necessary preparations to ensure that every 'swing' state was within reach (with a little number-fudging) simultaneously in 2020. Only problem was, they didn't have Hillary that time around. They had Biden. Oh well, he had to do. Trump wouldn't be underestimated again, this time they would have insurance.
Well, the basis of your argument rests on your belief that they somehow didn't want Hillary, rather than underestimating Trump. If that's the foundation that you've established for your theory, then yes, I could see how it seems illogical.
Your neighbors will demand it.
Finally, a government that is responsive to the citizens!
Finally, a government that is responsive to the citizens!
Reagan was the last politician to worm his way into the presidency by winning the voters. Ever hear Jim Garner talk about the idiot's stint as president of the Screen Actor's Guild? He just acted presidential, everyone said yeah he's a good figurehead and cribbed him the answers. Then he'd do the Jean-Luc Picard and said Make It So.
GHWB took Reagan under his wing and kept him out of trouble. Of course he got him in "trouble", but answering to the voters for Iran-Contra was nothing compared to answering to the CIA for preventing it.
Then we had Bush, then Clinton, then a little nepotism in the form of Bush's idiot child. Then came the token halfblack. At that point we started working at helping Ron Paul educate people. That had to be nipped in the bud.
The "Defenders of Democracy" are sick of democracy. They want it gone, and this plan (give or take however many details I have wrong) is how they're about to make that happen.
Give Republicans somebody charismatic playing the strong man. Take him away from them by means of an obvious theft designed to make Republicans give up on elections altogether. Install a useful idiot (he was something of a mover and shaker for a long while, so he's credible, but he's senile now) and use his administration to piss Republicans off in every way imaginable.
And now? Steal another election. Enjoy watching the riots for a while. March Trump into the Capitol and install him for life. Publicly put Biden out of his (and our) misery in a very public way. Start exterminating these imported criminals and whomever is unlucky enough to be nearby at the time. Take the cash, replace it with a CBDC run by the same thieves who are destroying the dollar. Make things better until Republicans get apathetic again, and then...
And then what? Nothing you really want your grandchildren to deal with, certainly.
We forced their hand and we're the only ones smart enough to stop them. But we're running out of time to open our eyes.
Reagan was more than a mere actor.
Unfortunately his dementia and choosing to ally with Bush was a major problem.
Sure. He could play an audience in a way that is quite different from delivering lines from a script. He wasn't a good enough actor to do what he did by taking direction. There have been a lot like him since television was invented, but very, very few have been even half as talented. He was what they call "A Natural". But even before then, politicians were chosen more for that talent than for real ability.
That's something very different from acting. Reagan was no actor at all. His looks and his schtick got him star status in movies, but he was no actor. Jimmy Stewart was a fine actor, and during Reagan's second term, more than a few Republicans were enthused by the idea of "casting" Stewart in that role. But Jimmy Stewart knew his limitations. He was just an actor. He knew he couldn't do what Reagan was doing.
And yes, in those simpler times the State of California could indeed be "run" in much the same way he "ran" the Screen Actor's Guild. Bring me solutions and let me say, "Make it so."
Choosing?
Yeah, okay, I'll make you my running mate to get you people off my back, but I'm the boss, not you.
*Hinckley inserts a .22 round in amongst his ribs*
I'm your Huckleberry.
Trump's smarter than Reagan was. He's already their Huckleberry.