Foreign Policy: How does Ron's foreign policy protect the US from terrorism?

And there you have it. If you dont believe it from the CIA director then you simply dont want to believe it.
 
Our current foreign policy supported by the establishment Republicans (including Beck, Levin, Hannity, Rush, etc) create 90% of the terrorism against us by being over there on "other people's land." This in turn creates hatred towards us, hence the terror.

How many people here want Russia, Iran, or China building military bases in your back yard to launch wars within the U.S.? Nuff said.

If we are attacked or about to get attacked, Ron Paul would go to war with Congressional approval. It doesn't get any simpler than that.

Side note: Today, you are more likely to be killed by a swarm of bees or get struck by lightening than to be killed by a terrorist. So why do we have to give up our freedoms and liberties for a police state? Just saying...
 
So what do we say when people claum that the terrorists attack us because they hate our freedoms
 
Last edited:
sdsubball23 said:
So what do we say when people claum that the terrorists attack us because they hate our
Click to expand...

...Freedoms?

Search for Michael Scheuer videos, like the one I provided above, explain his credentials, and show them to people. If they won't listen to an expert with extensive experience, they won't listen to anyone.
 
sdsubball23 said:
I'm a Ron Paul supporter and I have a question about his foreign policy. I think one of the main reasons we are war at least to a lot of america is to protect us from terrorism. If the terrorism does exist, then how would Ron Paul's non-interventionist policy protect us from terrorism? What if terrorists strike us first after we've pulled out of their lands? This could have a huge cost to us with lives being hurt.

Also is there evidence of a real terrorist threat?
Click to expand...

We created the terrorism.

 
What about the belief that we're preventing terrorism by the wars?

Newt made a point about this during one of the debated
 
sdsubball23 said:
What about the belief that we're preventing terrorism by the wars?
Click to expand...

Did you watch the Michael Scheuer videos?

To put it simply: We have a drone over Pakistan, we target a suspected terrorist, he is surrounded by ten school children. We take the shot anyway because he is a high value target. We kill him. We also kill the ten innocent children. We just eliminated one bad guy and created ten families full of hate towards the US. Was it a net positive? We just motivated people in ten families to attack the US in the future.

You can't eliminate terrorists by continuing to do the things that motivated them in the first place.
 
bluesc said:
Did you watch the Michael Scheuer videos?

To put it simply: We have a drone over Pakistan, we target a suspected terrorist, he is surrounded by ten school children. We take the shot anyway because he is a high value target. We kill him. We also kill the ten innocent children. We just eliminated one bad guy and created ten families full of hate towards the US. Was it a net positive? We just motivated people in ten families to attack the US in the future.

You can't eliminate terrorists by continuing to do the things that motivated them in the first place.
Click to expand...

We need to stop the aggression now.
 
terrorism is not a weapon and terrorists are not an army or nation.It is just a tactic for fighting bigger stronger enemies by striking fear into their population and hope to get them to a point where for them it would be better to pull back then to leave in fear or as in the case of USA make them paranoid that they stretch so much with men and resources that in the end they fail. .

If you did not occupy the middle east but Mexico and Southern America instead today Mexicans would be doing suicide attacks in the USA.

Just see who are the only nations that get attacked: USA,UK,Russia all of them in some kind of war or just plain occupying their land.

There are 2 ways out of this:

The German way : for every USA citizen or soldier dead you kill 10 000 Arabs (randomly),and get so much blood on your hands acid wont wash it.
The reasonable way : The USA goes home and in a few decades maybe you will get your good reputation back
 
Last edited:
sdsubball23 said:
do you all have any sources to backup your claims? I'm trying to do research on this subject so that I can be well-informed of whatever the truth is.
Click to expand...

Look into blowback. The real CIA definition of blowback is not simply retribution for our bombing campaigns, wars and overseas bases. Blowback is retribution for our secret bombing campaigns, secret funding and providing countries with weapons of mass destruction, secretly overthrowing democratically elected leaders, etc... that essentially means that the reasons for the terrorism are not reported in the news, so the media gets to make up reasons and the public is severely uneducated on the reasons why. This is why Ron Paul has a hard time getting traction because he can't give a 60 year foreign policy lesson in a two minute debate answer or even a 5 or 10 minute interview.

So in order to fully research the subject, you have to look into what our government has been doing, mostly in the Middle East and South America, for the last 60 years.

Our CIA helps to smuggle massive amounts of cocaine and heroin into our country in order to fund secret intelligence operations that are not funded with taxpayer dollars. That's going to piss some people off.

Also look into "Confessions of an Economic Hitman". Pretty much all the actions our government takes are in the name of big multi-national corporations.
 
Last edited:
sdsubball23 said:
What about the belief that we're preventing terrorism by the wars?

Newt made a point about this during one of the debated
Click to expand...

One of the main reasons we are in Afghanistan is to protect the poppy fields so the CIA can continue to get funding through heroin sales. The Taliban was destroying all of the poppy crops in the late 90s and since we have been there our military has been protecting the poppy fields and the brother of the puppet President of Afghanistan who we installed was actually dealing the heroin. It takes very little paying attention to alternative media to see that mainstream media is pretty much 100% propaganda.

The other main reason we are in Afghanistan was for an oil pipeline.

The reason we occupy countries are purely economic, and not for our country so much as the multi-national corporations, because we actually pay for the military action through taxes.

Newt is a puppet whose words on foreign policy are complete BS based completely on propaganda and have nothing to do with the reality of the situation.
 
Last edited:
sdsubball23, Newt has a $40BILLION dollar war contract. Look it up.

Same with Romney.

Think they care about other people? Their words on stage try to make us feel patriotic and united, but their backgrounds really tell a different story.
 
sdsubball23 said:
I'm a Ron Paul supporter and I have a question about his foreign policy. I think one of the main reasons we are war at least to a lot of america is to protect us from terrorism. If the terrorism does exist, then how would Ron Paul's non-interventionist policy protect us from terrorism? What if terrorists strike us first after we've pulled out of their lands? This could have a huge cost to us with lives being hurt.

Also is there evidence of a real terrorist threat?
Click to expand...
Ron Paul would protect our borders. Right now the are completely open. He has repeatedly said he would place troops there.

One of the reasons 9/11 happened is because no one listened to the threat or understood blowback. Ron Paul seems to have a better grasp at this than others. You also have to look at the goal of terrorism. It's hard for them to attack us over here because we're so far away, but it's easy for them to attack us in the Middle East and it's also a huge financial burden. In short, the terrorists are winning because they're making us go broke and killing a lot of our military. It also makes no sense for us to go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan to fight alQaida and then support them in Lybia.
 
How do we know all of this true?

Sorry I havent seen the videos yet I'm at work but I'll check them out later
 
sdsubball23 said:
So what do we say when people claum that the terrorists attack us because they hate our freedoms
Click to expand...
Ha! I love this question. This is the answer...

So apparently if we give up all of our freedoms they'll stop hating us?! That certainly seems to be the establishment's plan!
 
CaptUSA said:
Ha! I love this question. This is the answer...

So apparently if we give up all of our freedoms they'll stop hating us?! That certainly seems to be the establishment's plan!
Click to expand...
9
I know there are different laws proposed that seem to take away freedoms but what and whos freedoms have really been taken?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

wizardwatson
Trump's Hate Speech Will Get You Deported EO
10 11 12
Replies
234
Views
4K
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Pentagon's New Mideast Policy Chief Wants To Scale Down US Presence In Region
Replies
0
Views
149
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
PAF
Don’t Just Reform the US Government’s War on Drugs. End It.
Replies
2
Views
445
TheTexan
TheTexan
PAF
Cuts to Foreign Aid is a Good Start
Replies
2
Views
98
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
PAF
We Lose, They Lose: A Reagan-Trump Fusion
Replies
0
Views
1K
PAF
PAF
Back
Top