How do you plan to vote in November?

[VBRonPaulFan]

my state allows write-in's, so i'll be writing in Paul's name if he doesn't get the nomination. if absolutely pushed to pick one of the candidates above, it'd probably be Johnson.

 

[Aratus]

i am in the bay state and i can vote for gary johnson or mitt romney or i can sit this one out

 

[John F Kennedy III]

I will be writing in Ron Paul.

 

[realtonygoodwin]

We should all boycott elections. If its less then a certain percentage they call it illegitimate ?
Either way I'm not voting. I was a political atheist before Ron and I will remain that way. No Paul no vote.

Nope. As long as there is one vote, the election counts.

 

[QueenB4Liberty]

Ron Paul

Seriously where is this option? I guess no one but Paul died fast.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

My state allows write-ins. I'll write in either RP or an imaginary character.

 

[malkusm]

Voting under America's corrupt take on fascism does nothing to advance freedom.

Well, as a practical matter, voting doesn't do anything at all. But, since we're in the business of political activism here...

 

[Anti Federalist]

Seriously where is this option? I guess no one but Paul died fast.

Thread was started by a wobbly, trying to gauge how many are willing to "hold their nose", vote for party unity and come in for the "big win".

I'm not even sure about Ron now, after this latest fiasco.

I may just write in Vermin Supreme.

 

[ryanmkeisling]

Thread was started by a wobbly, trying to gauge how many are willing to "hold their nose", vote for party unity and come in for the "big win".

I'm not even sure about Ron now, after this latest fiasco.

I may just write in Vermin Supreme.

This current fiasco is to much to stomach. It would seem Ron Paul himself has sold us out, and for what isn't even clear...

 

[chudrockz]

My state allows write-ins, but even if it didn't, I would do it anyway: RON PAUL.

I'd take a bullet before I'd vote for ANYONE else.

 

[Anti Federalist]

This current fiasco is to much to stomach. It would seem Ron Paul himself has sold us out, and for what isn't even clear...

The only thing I could excuse is threats, especially against family.

Not outside the realm of possibility.

 

[chudrockz]

The only thing I could excuse is threats, especially against family.

Not outside the realm of possibility.

Not only is it not "outside the realm of possibility," I think it's likely. Scary.

 

[QueenB4Liberty]

Thread was started by a wobbly, trying to gauge how many are willing to "hold their nose", vote for party unity and come in for the "big win".

I'm not even sure about Ron now, after this latest fiasco.

I may just write in Vermin Supreme.

What fiasco? Rand on Hannity? I don't blame Ron for that.

 

[Elwar]

NO ONE BUT PAUL!!!

 

[ryanmkeisling]

The only thing I could excuse is threats, especially against family.

Not outside the realm of possibility.

I could excuse this as well, but the implications of this for me mean that drastic measures are in order from here on out. I remain unafraid and if they are threatening Ron Paul they are threatening me; I would not hesitate to defend that with my life.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I could excuse this as well, but the implications of this for me mean that drastic measures are in order from here on out. I remain unafraid and if they are threatening Ron Paul they are threatening me; I would not hesitate to defend that with my life.

I bought the whole lie that Ross Perot was "nuts" when he went around claiming that George Bush had sent men around to threaten people at his daughter's wedding.

After looking into it further, and 20 years of cynicism and "war wounds" later, I no longer think he was "nuts".

We're in a tight spot here, tighter than maybe even I'm willing to admit.

 

[Cleaner44]

I bought the whole lie that Ross Perot was "nuts" when he went around claiming that George Bush had sent men around to threaten people at his daughter's wedding.

After looking into it further, and 20 years of cynicism and "war wounds" later, I no longer think he was "nuts".

We're in a tight spot here, tighter than maybe even I'm willing to admit.

We knew after Iowa that it was going to be difficult. We needed a 1st in IA and 2nd in NH to build real momentum. The R3VOLUTION made great strides this cycle and we are lightyears ahead of 2007. It is critical that Romney not win in 2012 so we can continue remaking the GOP, we must drag it back to its roots. Soon will start the Campaign for Liberty 2.0 and we will have more liberty candidates in state and federal offices than ever before. No longer will Ron be the lone voice of reason in D.C. among a group of hostile statists. There is still much work to be done and we are more than capable. It is the neocons that are in a tough spot my brother... the days of the borrow and spenders are coming to an end.

 

[realtonygoodwin]

Thread was started by a wobbly, trying to gauge how many are willing to "hold their nose", vote for party unity and come in for the "big win".

I'm not even sure about Ron now, after this latest fiasco.

I may just write in Vermin Supreme.

A wobbly? I don't even know what that means.

How about you have no idea why this thread was started, obviously.

 

[Butchie]

Obama just to screw the GOP after how they've treated us, it really doesn't matter which of them gets in so figure for some revenge on the NeoCons.

 

[pcosmar]

Fine, but all the people on the ballot are running as nominees of parties.

And I am an independent voter, I do not vote for a party,, I vote for a person.
And I supported the independent running in the Local Michigan Race,, last time.

The "Tea Party" supported a rubber stamp. And they won.
Now there is yet another empty suit rubber stamp supporting socialism the Patriot act and more war.

But I didn't vote for the bastard just because he has an "R" by his name.