Hornberger (FFF) versus Helmke (Brady group): Do We Need Stricter Gun Control Laws?

MsDoodahs

Senior
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
11,373
Got this via email from www.fff.org which is Jacob Hornberger's group, The Future of Freedom Foundation. I have not been able to watch the video yet as I am on dialup for now. I put the link at the end of the quote from the email, hope some of y'all can take a listen. :)

"On November 16, I participated in a debate on ABC News’ Nightline Twittercast, which was broadcast on the Internet. The subject: “Do We Need Stricter Gun Control Laws?” My opponent was Paul Helmke, head of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the leading gun-control group in the country. The debate took place in the context of the Ft. Hood killings, where gun control prevented the murder victims from defending themselves from the killer, who didn’t give a hoot for the gun-control law.

While some people have been comforted by President Obama’s expressed opposition to any new gun-control measure, here at FFF we are not among them. We must remain vigilant against any such measure, for some big shooting or terrorist attack could cause Obama to turn on a dime and quickly sign a gun-control bill sent to him by the Democratic-controlled Congress.

As we have long maintained here at FFF, the right to keep and bear arms is absolutely essential to a free society. Not only does it provide the means by which people can defend themselves from murderers, it also constitutes the best insurance policy against tyranny.

I hope you will watch the debate and share it with your friends, relatives, and email lists. Here is the link to the debate."


http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?catId=7578045
 
I like how it cuts out after the Brady guy gives fake "statistics" to back up his claims and doesn't let the FFF guy point out that he is lying.
 
Brady bunch = made up stats like "cities with more guns have more gun violence" was he referring to Washington, DC?
 
I like how it cuts out after the Brady guy gives fake "statistics" to back up his claims and doesn't let the FFF guy point out that he is lying.

All the victim disarmament side has are lies. That's all they've ever had. They're always easily disproven. Yet people still believe them.
 
All the victim disarmament side has are lies. That's all they've ever had. They're always easily disproven. Yet people still believe them.

My favorite is when you point out gun grabber stats are lies and they tell you that the actual stats indicating gun laws are harmful are just conservative propaganda. Then they whine about the evil gun manufacturers and the corporate gun lobby when, in reality, gun manufacturers make so much from military and police weapons contracts that they'd probably be better off turning their civilian weapons production facilities into military production ones.
 
Back
Top