Yeah, because it's illegal to not take the check, right? Stopping giving them checks will give them 'FREEDOM', right? Let me go steal their check and free them from this shackle...wtf!
Let's see here, a check is physical and you think removing the check removes the mental chain. I can see why you are confused.
The fact you are comparing a mental chain to a metal chain is exactly the bone I am picking. I will be happy to put a metal chain on anybody who claims is mental chain is equally bad or worse. If it's in fact no worse on a metal chain, I challenge anybody to volunteer as my slave.
There is a reason why your challenge fails on it's face. Before you can have someone voluntarily be your slave, you would need to involuntarily enslave their mind. Otherwise, you know that any mentally free person is going to reject your challenge. This doesn't prove your point. It proves mine. The fact that no one is willing to physically put themselves into slavery shows that physical chains have no power over mentally free people.
Again, you can argue all you want, I'll take it seriously when somebody volunteers it. How many physical scars and whips will you take if I can guarantee your child will never get welfare checks?
In fact, I think what you are demonstrating here is that you are voluntarily placing mental restraints on yourself. You are not arguing, you are ignoring. Ignorance is a HUGE link in the mental restraints that the ruling class use to attempt to arrest free minds. Now the second part of what you just said is somewhat interesting, but you are still stuck on the idea that something physical is doing the binding. It's not the check I'm concerned about, it's the assault on my child's spirit and mind. I believe I can handle making sure my child doesn't get welfare checks.
Do you consider that perhaps they are simply genetically disabled or victims of racism other than state instituted? It's either the fault of the government or the fault of the government, it can't be the fault of themselves or their other surroundings, right?
Yes, I do consider this. It doesn't change anything. In fact folk with disabilities are even more at risk of mental slavery from the ruling class. You again help my point along. The government offers to lighten the burden of those NATURAL physical chains at the cost of placing mental chains. This is not the role of government but it does sound like where you got the idea for someone to voluntarily bind themselves with chains YOU provide. Except you got it backwards, but you do have the concept worked out.
TLDR, I'll take a person seriously when he/she demonstrates it, talk is easy. I can say waterboarding is not preferable to having an arm cut off, does that mean you have to believe me?
And your chains are now exposed. If you are unwilling to read my response in it's entirety, then why you bother to craft a response of your own? You see, I think you did read, you just took the lazy, ignorant approach to responding. You claim you didn't read and then go right back to the same ignorant point that I originally responded to.
