Hillary Clinton just collectively slammed all white people on Twitter

That is a mythical excuse - not that poverty has no impact on crime, just that when studies are adjusted for poverty/income, blacks still commit more crime.



I tend to break ranks with the Bell Curve people on this one point, if only in that I subscribe to a Lamarckist view of inheritance rather than the Modern Synthesis approach. Poverty on a single generational level doesn't always correlate to criminality, but I would definitely ascribe more of a direct correlation of poverty and broken households in a 2-generation context to criminality. In fact, I'd argue that the poverty and marital situation of the parents can have a drastic and immediate effect on the behavior of an individual. While the IQ discrepancies between people of African descent vs. other ethnic backgrounds are still present, I wouldn't alone attribute those to criminality, and in my opinion there is a great deal of correlation between collective low IQ and cultural tendencies that are passed on from parent to offspring.
 
#Killary playing her race card in a DNC deck of all race cards. Nothing new or surprising here.
 
FYI, not every user is configured properly to see Tweets.

It's good to also quote the text. I assume this is the Tweet in question:



Standard leftist divide and conquer technique.

Standard right-wing dismissal used to propagate the idea that we should be "colorblind" in a world that's anything but. It would be great if we lived in an ideal world, but unfortunately, that is not the case. Who are you to tell minorities that they should be colorblind when there are specific issues they face due to the color of their skin? You're part of the problem. You're more concerned with this perceived slight against white people than you are the actual struggles minorities face.

When someone (Hillary in this case) says white people need to listen, it means they need to understand why there's so much distrust with regards to the police, for example. It is mostly white people who continue to prop up the police state because they're afraid of the "Other." Quit weeping over the death throes of white hegemony and start understanding those who are being squashed by the boot of the State who aren't white.
 
Not once in my post did I address what Hillary said or how you're supposed to be a better listener. I'm addressing only the fact that some are talking as if they believe welfare put black people in poverty. Welfare contributes to why black people remain in poverty, but it didn't put them there.

You're right for the most part. I guess I took issue with your claim that people are denying racism exists and then went on addressing the OP. I wasn't really addressing what you said though. You're right. Sorry if confusing.
 
There are more poor whites total than blacks. There are more poor hispanics total than blacks.
 
I think she is just hoping that someone will vote for her.

Of course she is, and we should criticize her for her insincerity. But what she says in the OP is totally unobjectionable. Why does anyone have a problem with it?
 
White people is an artificial term that has been turned into a political weapon of sorts.

That's essentially true. But it it hasn't been turned into a political weapon, it has always been one ever since the concept of a racial distinction between white and black was invented. And from then until now it has primarily been a weapon used at the expense of those who don't fit into the "white" category more than those who do.
 
Things like "listening" and "having a dialogue" sound great. Who isn't for those things? I feel like the side that votes 95% Democrat isn't doing a whole lot of listening, otherwise they wouldn't vote for more socialism.

Here Hillary. Do some listening. Maybe some of these people will be future cabinet members.

 
Standard right-wing dismissal used to propagate the idea that we should be "colorblind" in a world that's anything but. It would be great if we lived in an ideal world, but unfortunately, that is not the case. Who are you to tell minorities that they should be colorblind when there are specific issues they face due to the color of their skin? You're part of the problem. You're more concerned with this perceived slight against white people than you are the actual struggles minorities face.

When someone (Hillary in this case) says white people need to listen, it means they need to understand why there's so much distrust with regards to the police, for example. It is mostly white people who continue to prop up the police state because they're afraid of the "Other." Quit weeping over the death throes of white hegemony and start understanding those who are being squashed by the boot of the State who aren't white.

:rolleyes:

Hillary is pandering with an over-used collectivist platitude. Celebrate that all you want.
 
That was some fortune cookie bs, but it wasn't even towards me it was at me but it was like as authentic as a hallmark card. Even when she tweets i hear it in this not sincere tone of voice that sounds condescending.
 
#Killary playing her race card in a DNC deck of all race cards. Nothing new or surprising here.

Just wait until (if) she 'wins', then the narrative will change to sexism if you disagree with her policies. The simple fact is that facts and logical argument are being engineered out of society and a purely emotionally motivated society put into its place. Think the state of the family unit is bad now? Ha, just wait until women are told 24/7 that anyone that disagrees with socialist emotional arguments is a "sexist". TPTB still firmly believe in "nature" being the driving force behind how the planet functions. They just don't want the little people thinking the same way, because that breeds logical and factual decisions. Logic and facts for them, emotions and rhetoric for the slaves. It's already there to some extent but it's going to go into hyperdrive soon enough. Divide and conquer until everyone is in their own little box of labels and distrust. Eventually no one will have any empathy for anyone else....then it's Hunger Games time and nature takes back over.
 
Last edited:
Just wait until (if) she 'wins', then the narrative will change to sexism if you disagree with her policies. The simple fact is that facts and logical argument are being engineered out of society and a purely emotionally motivated society put into its place. Think the state of the family unit is bad now? Ha, just wait until women are told 24/7 that anyone that disagrees with socialist emotional arguments is a "sexist". TPTB still firmly believe in "nature" being the driving force behind how the planet functions. They just don't want the little people thinking the same way, because that breeds logical and factual decisions. Logic and facts for them, emotions and rhetoric for the slaves. It's already there to some extent but it's going to go into hyperdrive soon enough. Divide and conquer until everyone is in their own little box of labels and distrust. Eventually no one will have any empathy for anyone else....then it's Hunger Games time and nature takes back over.

Vote for me because I'm a woman.

 
Back
Top