CaptUSA
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 19,106
The left has been on a "ban gerrymandering" push for months. They got a ton of signatures to put it to a voter referendum on this year's ballot. But it's the most dishonest, deceitful power grab I've seen in a while.
Rather than "banning" gerrymandering (which is something that can't be done anyway), it simply takes the drawing of district maps out of the hands of the representatives and puts it in the hands of an appointed, unelected bureaucracy. Is that better or worse?? That's not the question, plebe! Don't you want to "ban gerrymandering"!!
But here's the hilarious thing... The left, who obviously thinks they can use the panel to draw more favorable districts for them to move Ohio left, screwed up. You see, the state is already run by republicans. So, while they couldn't block the amendment from going on the ballot, they could, and did, create the language for the ballot language. Here's how it'll appear on the ballot:
The amount of money the left is spending on this to get people to vote yes should tell you something. But will they be able to overcome this ballot language??
Rather than "banning" gerrymandering (which is something that can't be done anyway), it simply takes the drawing of district maps out of the hands of the representatives and puts it in the hands of an appointed, unelected bureaucracy. Is that better or worse?? That's not the question, plebe! Don't you want to "ban gerrymandering"!!
But here's the hilarious thing... The left, who obviously thinks they can use the panel to draw more favorable districts for them to move Ohio left, screwed up. You see, the state is already run by republicans. So, while they couldn't block the amendment from going on the ballot, they could, and did, create the language for the ballot language. Here's how it'll appear on the ballot:
Issue 1
To create an appointed redistricting commission not elected by or subject to removal by the voters of the state
Proposed Constitutional Amendment
Proposed by Initiative Petition To repeal Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of Article XI, Repeal sections 1, 2 and 3 of
Article XIX, And enact Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of Article XX of the Constitution of the State of Ohio
A majority yes vote is necessary for the amendment to pass.
The proposed amendment would:
1. Repeal constitutional protections against gerrymandering approved by nearly three -quarters of Ohio electors participating in the statewide lections
of 2015 and 2018, and eliminate the longstanding ability of Ohio citizens to hold their representatives accountable for establishing fair state legislative and congressional districts.
2. Establish a new taxpayer-funded commission of appointees required to gerrymander the boundaries of state legislative and congressional districts to favor either of the two largest political parties in the state of Ohio, according to a formula based on partisan outcomes as the dominant factor, so that:
A. Each district shall contain single-member districts that are geographically contiguous, but state legislative and congressional districts will no onger be required to be compact; and
B. Counties, townships and cities throughout Ohio can be split and divided across multiple districts, and preserving communities of interest will be secondary to the formula that is based on partisan political outcomes.
3. Require that a majority of the partisan commission members belong to the state’s two largest political parties.
4. Prevent a commission member from being removed, except by a vote of their fellow commission members, even for incapacity, willful neglect of
duty or gross misconduct.
5. Prohibit any citizen from filing a lawsuit challenging a redistricting plan in any court, except if the lawsuit challenges the proportionality standard applied by the commission, requirements pertaining to an incumbent elected official’s residence, or the expiration of certain senators’ terms, and then only before the Ohio Supreme Court.
6. Create the following process for appointing commission members: Four partisan appointees on the Ohio Ballot Board will choose a panel of 4 partisan retired judges (2 affiliated with the first major political party and 2 affiliated with the second major political party). Provide that the 4
legislative appointees of the Ohio Ballot Board would be responsible for appointing the panel members as follows: the Ballot Board legislative appointees affiliated with the same major political party would select 8 applicants and present those to the Ballot Board legislative appointees affiliated with the other major political party, who would then select 2 persons from the 8 for appointment to the panel, resulting in 4 panel appointees. The panel would then hire a private professional search firm to help them choose 6 of the 15 individuals on the commission. The panel will choose those 6 individuals by initially creating a pool of 90 individuals (30 from the first major political party, 30 from the second major political
party, and 30 from neither the first nor second major political parties). The panel of 4 partisan retired judges will create a portal for public comment
on the applicants and will conduct and publicly broadcast interviews with each applicant in the pool. The panel will then narrow the pool of 90 individuals down to 45 (15 from the first major political party; 15 from the second major political party; and 15 from neither the first nor second major political parties). Randomly, by draw, the 4 partisan retired judges will then blindly select 6 names out of the pool first nor second major political parties).
The 6 randomly drawn individuals will then review the applications of the remaining 39 individuals not randomly drawn and select the final 9 individuals to serve with them on the commission, the majority of which shall be from the first and the second major political parties (3 from the first major political party, 3 from the second major political party, and 3 from neither the first nor second major political parties).
7. Require the affirmative votes of 9 of 15 members of the appointed commission to create legislative and congressional districts. If the commission is not able to determine a plan by September 19, 2025, or July 15 of every year ending in one, the following impasse procedure will be used: for any plan at an impasse, each commissioner shall have 3 days to submit no more than one proposed redistricting plan to be subject to a commission vote through a ranked-choice selection process, with the goal of having a majority of the commission members rank one of those plans first. If a majority cannot be obtained, the plan with the highest number of points in the ranked-choice process is eliminated, and the process is repeated until a plan receives a majority of first-place rankings. If the ranked-choice process ends in a tie for the highest point total, the tie shall be broken through a random process.
8. Limit the right of Ohio citizens to freely express their opinions to members of the commission or to commission staff regarding the redistricting process or proposed redistricting plans, other than through designated meetings, hearings and an online public portal, and would forbid communication with the commission members and staff outside of those contexts.
9. Require the commission to immediately create new legislative and congressional districts in 2025 to replace the most recent districts adopted by the citizens of Ohio through their elected representatives.
10. Impose new taxpayer-funded costs on the State of Ohio to pay the commission members, the commission staff and appointed special masters, professionals, and private consultants that the commission is required to hire; and an unlimited amount for legal expenses incurred by the commission in any related litigation.
If approved, the amendment will be effective 30 days after the election.
SHALL THE AMENDMENT
BE APPROVED?
YES
NO
The amount of money the left is spending on this to get people to vote yes should tell you something. But will they be able to overcome this ballot language??