Honest and dishonest does not matter so much when the dishonest one says he doesn't want to use the power of government to control the lives of the citizenry and the honest one admits that he does. They are the same thing.
Nader is a collectivist who wants to use the force of government to redistribute wealth. He spoke for over 10 minutes on Meet the Press. He mentioned evil corporations several times, he mentioned the constitution... zippy times.
What good is peace without freedom?
What is more corrupt than stealing your labor to pay for someone else's entitlement? How long do you have to work so that someone else can benefit?
McCain is no better for sure but the people who think that Nader is a suitable Paul substitute did not understand the freedom message.
We need to end the idea that government can best decide what is in our own best interest better than we can decide for ourselves.
