Yet, I don't see these posters concern.
T-shirts, Yard signs, and chocolates don't have the potential to turn off prospective voters or step on a campaign's message.
You want to promote liberty and make money at the same time. That is admirable. Kudos to you.
If these are just sent to Ron Paul voters, there will probably be little harm. However, if they are sent to a broader audience, the results are unpredictable. It's like trying to swat flies with a sledgehammer. You may get a couple, but you'll be doing damage, too.
Anyway, I don't really have a bone to pick. I'd like the brochures to stay away from anything controversial. That includes foreign policy. It also includes the Fed, unfortunately. And you should REALLY reconsider making comparisons to other GOP candidates. If Rand is going to win those people over, it won't be because we belittled their favorite horse. The biggest lesson from 2012 was that our candidate needs to be
acceptable. He can be someone's second or third choice, but he has to be
acceptable. A "super-brochure" has the potential of making an acceptable candidate, unacceptable.
You see, many of us have limited funds and would like to do the most good with it. You are trying to sell the brochures to
us. But
we are not the ones we are concerned about. If it were, you would just be asking us to buy the brochure and bumper for ourselves. Instead, you should be trying to sell us on the idea that they would be useful to convert others. But the way they are laid out, suggests that these are "our" issues, not "theirs". The only way to know "their" issue is to research them - and that's what the campaigns do.
