Hardball: Chris Matthews wants 1 hour with Dr Paul

Educate yourself:

Operation Mockingbird

Starting in the early days of the Cold War (late 40's), the CIA began a secret project called Operation Mockingbird, with the intent of buying influence behind the scenes at major media outlets and putting reporters on the CIA payroll, which has proven to be a stunning ongoing success. The CIA effort to recruit American news organizations and journalists to become spies and disseminators of propaganda, was headed up by Frank Wisner, Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, and Philip Graham (publisher of The Washington Post). Wisner had taken Graham under his wing to direct the program code-named Operation Mockingbird and both have presumably committed suicide.

Media assets will eventually include ABC, NBC, CBS, Time, Newsweek, Associated Press, United Press International (UPI), Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Copley News Service, etc. and 400 journalists, who have secretly carried out assignments according to documents on file at CIA headquarters, from intelligence-gathering to serving as go-betweens. The CIA had infiltrated the nation's businesses, media, and universities with tens of thousands of on-call operatives by the 1950's. CIA Director Dulles had staffed the CIA almost exclusively with Ivy League graduates, especially from Yale with figures like George Herbert Walker Bush from the "Skull and Crossbones" Society.

Many Americans still insist or persist in believing that we have a free press, while getting most of their news from state-controlled television, under the misconception that reporters are meant to serve the public. Reporters are paid employees and serve the media owners, who usually cower when challenged by advertisers or major government figures. Robert Parry reported the first breaking stories about Iran-Contra for Associated Press that were largely ignored by the press and congress, then moving to Newsweek he witnessed a retraction of a true story for political reasons. In 'Fooling America: A Talk by Robert Parry' he said, "The people who succeeded and did well were those who didn't stand up, who didn't write the big stories, who looked the other way when history was happening in front of them, and went along either consciously or just by cowardice with the deception of the American people."

Major networks are primarily controlled by giant corporations that are obligated by law, to put the profits of their investors ahead of all other considerations which are often in conflict with the practice of responsible journalism. There were around 50 corporations a couple of decades ago, which was considered monopolistic by many and yet today, these companies have become larger and fewer in number as the biggest ones absorb their rivals. This concentration of ownership and power reduces the diversity of media voices, as news falls into the hands of large conglomerates with holdings in many industries that interferes in newsgathering, because of conflicts of interest. Mockingbird was an immense financial undertaking with funds flowing from the CIA largely through the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF) founded by Tom Braden with Pat Buchanon of CNN's Crossfire.

Media corporations share members of the board of directors with a variety of other large corporations including banks, investment companies, oil companies, health care, pharmaceutical, and technology companies. Until the 1980's, media systems were generally domestically owned, regulated, and national in scope. However, pressure from the IMF, World Bank, and US government to deregulate and privatize, the media, communication, and new technology resulted in a global commercial media system dominated by a small number of super-powerful transnational media corporations (mostly US based), working to advance the cause of global markets and the CIA agenda.

The first tier of the nine giant firms that dominate the world are Time Warner/AOL, Disney/ABC, Bertelsmann, Viacom/CBS, Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation/Fox, General Electric/NBC, Sony, Universal/Seagram, Tele-Communications, Inc. or TCI and AT&T. This is just the head of the octopus which has its second and third tier tentacles working together in unison or feigned division. This would include The Washington Post/Newsweek, The New York Times/Weekly Standard, Tribune Co., US News, Gannett/USA Today, Dow Jones/Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, Knight-Ridder, etcetera. A good site to visit for more information is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, a public interest media watchdog group, at www.fair.org/index.html, www.fair.org/mediafiles/index.html and www.fair.org/extra/9711/gmg.html. Media propaganda tactics include blackouts, misdirections, expert opinions to echo the Establishment line, smears, defining popular opinions, mass entertainment distractions, and Hobson's Choice (the media presents the so-called conservative and liberal positions).

"Who Controls the Media? The Subversion of the Free Press by the CIA, The Depraved Spies and Moguls of the CIA's Operation Mockingbird", "The CIA: America's Premier International Terrorist Organization", and "Virtual Government: CIA Mind Control Operations in America" by Alex Constantine are an excellent source of information on this topic: www.alexconstantine.50megs.com/the_cia_and.html and www.alexconstantine.50megs.com. David Guyatt has written books and many articles including one entitled "Subverting the Media" at www.deepblacklies.co.uk/subverting_the_media.htm. Then there are two articles called "A Timeline of CIA Atrocities" and "The Origins of the Overclass" by Steve Kangas that are very informative although from a more liberal perspective. Steve will not be writing anymore articles as he is no longer with us, having unfortunately met his untimely death that was 'apparently' from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. If you read about him on his web page that is still available, you will see that he did not seem like a person who was suffering from deep depression. In his memory, please take the time to read what he wrote at www.korpios.org/resurgent/CIAtimeline.html, www.korpios.org/resurgent/CIAtimeline.html, and www.korpios.org/resurgent/index.html.
That's amazing.
 
I think he should accept the Chris Matthews invitations and snub Glen.

Not that that is smart campaigning, but it just somehow FEELS RIGHT. :-p lol

Ok Yeah I'm slightly vindicative, I confess.

Rev

There is subtle logic behind this.. The pundits need to look at their 2009 mouthpiece contracts and wonder if their rhetoric will keep them employed.

Regards
Randy
 
You guys, Glenn Beck does the hour-long specials without guest panels. There is just Glenn and the guest, sitting at a table, talking slowly and thoroughly for an hour. There is never anyone else for those hour-long shows.

Meanwhile, like someone else said, I have never seen Chris Matthews do a one-hour show before for just one guest, though it would be very cool if he did.

Just letting you know about the format.

Matthews does one hour shows with a single guest live at college campuses -- the Hardball College Tour.

Edit -- Sorry - I quoted the wrong message. Meant to quote the one saying Matthews hasn't done one hour with a single quest before.
 
there are so many things we are not aware of in regards to the media that we shouldnt be harrassing HQ, or demanding reasons for their decisions/indecisions... they have managed through adversity to get to this point(with a huge amount of help from us) and have done a fantastic job in my opinion.. there will be plenty of media coverage over the next few weeks with the recent surpasing of all other candidates 3rd Quarter takings, so squabbling over THE INDECISION for just one show(a sometimes pathetic show at that) is completely pointless and just fractures the movement further.. As Ron himself said, do you really want to see him more on shows like The O'Reilly Factor(yes i know, Beck is not like O'Reilly, but playing the Ron Paul supporters are terrorists card lumped him in with that group)..
 
It's not about us.
It's all about getting NEW supporters who may not know RP well yet.
 
Somehow he has enough time for multiple interviews with Alex Jones, but can't make the time for Chris Matthews?
 
The only person i've seen Chris Matthews attack during an interview is Mike Huckabee.

Chris used to be a Goldwater conservative. You never forget where you came from.
 
Somehow he has enough time for multiple interviews with Alex Jones, but can't make the time for Chris Matthews?
He has had multiple interviews with Alex Jones? Alex Jones audience is microscopic and they already know about Ron Paul. The campaign is incompetent!
 
1-hour is really tough guys! Because in reality it takes a whole day of campaigning away. In case you haven't notices Ron is very conservative with his money to, so flying out to these studios, getting prepped, and flying back is an all day thing. The schedule is continually being fleshed out to what is most going to get us votes. These guys who want these interviews need to go to Paul not the other way around. The campaign knows it's bigger than the MSM. We as the people need to act that way. I still refuse to turn them on whether they have him on the show or not.

Sure Ron Paul could hold a typical rally with a couple of hundred or so of his supporters that are ALREADY VOTING FOR HIM! Or he could go on GB and CM and actually reach a couple of thousand new people that don't know much about him...
 
I cant believe this hasnt been taken advantage of yet.
Ron Paul's campaign monkeys need to put down the bananas and pick up the phone.
 
Back
Top