Snowball
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,237
You're suggesting that the Establishment/Deep State wanted Trump over Clinton? I'm not buying that, not for a second. The same cabal of entities that attempted to destroy him just months after he was elected (and this is ignoring the fact that they sought to destroy him throughout the campaign) briefly sought to seat him in the presidency? I mean, anything is possible, but Occam's Razor suggests that they didn't think he was going to win (and looking at his poll numbers and popular consensus confirms this) and they could just ride out this insurgency without problem. But it turned out that he *did* win, and thus 2020 was clearly an op to make sure that blunder didn't happen again.
Nobody gets to sit behind that desk unless it has been fore-ordained. Trump was a 1 in a million shot, and I'm not AT ALL suggesting that he was a net positive to liberty. But he got there, and they didn't like it, and that's as clear as day. Look at how all of the people around him reacted.
The only reason they didn't kill him was because they figured they could scam him out of office in 2020... and they did.
They are not always a unified group that agrees on everything. I believe there were competing camps of the elites on each side, and that in some cases, Secretaries of State manipulate elections. Sometimes, both candidates are acceptable. (most often, actually). In other words, the disunity of the shadow elites on the matter contributed to the "allowing" of a Trump victory. Hillary is still very active and could be a contender in 2024. Any news search shows this.
A rematch with a Hillary beating Trump in 2024 would probably be one of the biggest inside jokes they ever played on us.