Chieppa1
Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2009
- Messages
- 2,046
Wrong.
Well that's cleared up...
Wrong.
Cue the "the US attacked Haiti with an earthquake machine to get the oil" cross-links...
Well that's cleared up...
So you got to the interviews with the son of the creator of HAARP technology?
You understand that it can in fact be used to create earthquakes and direct weather remotely?
would be enough oil to last the US for ... (are you ready?)....about three and a half hours. We consume almost 21 million a day. Not hardly worth getting excited about. Rescue and rebuilding will use more than that up probably. It might help them domestically a bit but would not be enough to try to export. And certainly not worth the damage which occured. Assuming that you could get it all up and get $70 a barrel for it you are looking at about $200 million. But you would also have to pay for the drilling and transportation systems to get the oil up and out of the country (i assume processing and refining would be done someplace else like here otherwise you have to build a refinery as well... )- they have no infrastructure for that. No- not enough oil to get excited about.The Dominican Republic shares the island of Hispaniola with Haiti. It may have 3 million barrels of oil in a shallow offshore formation that’s probably also shared by Haiti, Pierce said.
I also know nature does it too. Christ.
You know. I got a good idea. When we get our Liberty Candidate running for President, and he's finally into the debates, kicking ass and all that. Let's hope they don't ask something stupid like:
"Do you believe the earthquake in Haiti that has begun our occupation there was created by a machine so the US could control Haiti for its oil?"
Why can we just focus on what we can kind of prove?
I also know nature does it too. Christ.
Why can we just focus on what we can kind of prove?
Back to the original topic- the possible oil in Haiti. Let's consider that pool of oil it talks about
would be enough oil to last the US for ... (are you ready?)....about three and a half hours. We consume almost 21 million a day. Not hardly worth getting excited about. Rescue and rebuilding will use more than that up probably. It might help them domestically a bit but would not be enough to try to export. And certainly not worth the damage which occured. Assuming that you could get it all up and get $70 a barrel for it you are looking at about $200 million. But you would also have to pay for the drilling and transportation systems to get the oil up and out of the country (i assume processing and refining would be done someplace else like here otherwise you have to build a refinery as well... )- they have no infrastructure for that. No- not enough oil to get excited about.
May be ol' Pat was right, earthquake in Haiti was a God's sign of blessing...Haiti Earthquake May Have Exposed Gas, Aiding Economy
May be ol' Pat was right, earthquake in Haiti was a God's sign of blessing...
or was it anger....![]()
'cept we've known about oil reserves in Haiti for decades
Thank you for pointing that out. 941 million barrels would last us a month and a half.
Which former defense secretaries said we could cause earthquakes and how did they say we could do it? Why don't we use it in Iran to halt their nuclear program? We aren't going to invade them so it would be about the only way we could stop them.
Haiti is poor and its government corrupt enough that oil companies could have just bribed their way in.
Amazing that people can be so blind due to their hatred of government that they fail to recognize that businesses such as oil and gas companies will raise the standard of living for Haitians. Our pets here have better food and shelter so how could this possible be a bad thing for them.
btw - to even entertain that we created the earthquake leads me to believe you guys need to get outside, stay off the internet and stop watching the Sci-Fi channel for a week.![]()