Greg Brannon - US Senate Throw Down Party

FSP-Rebel

Mr. Republitarian
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
11,528
Some have said that Dr. Brannon could trump Rand on the purity chart and while that remains to be seen, he's been out speechifying and attending house parties across the state to get his grassroots traction going. So between now and the 30th we need to raise as much money for him as possible cause when the quarter ends he'll need ample donations to bring more donations and endorsements on board. The guy got major applause when he addressed the attendees at the recent state convention and he has a good pitch that resonates with southern conservatives. http://secure.gregbrannon.com/

http://gregbrannon.com/us-senate-2014-the-doctor-is-in/
“If you want to be represented by a Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Lee or Jim DeMint type, send me to the US Senate.”
“If it’s not enumerated in The Constitution, the federal government has no business being in that business. Plain and simple.”

I'll match the first $100 derived from this thread.
 
Donated.

Thank you!
Thank you for your generous donation!

Amount: $25.00
Transaction ID: ch_xxxxxxxxxx
Transaction date/time: 2013-06-28 15:xxxxx

I also snatched up the gregbrannon2014(dot)c0m domain so it won't be messed with. I wondered why his FB and Twitter accounts are gregbrannon2014 but not his official campaign domain. Anyway, I own it now and will set up a redirector to his official page soon.
 
Last edited:
Donated.



I also snatched up the gregbrannon2014(dot)c0m domain so it won't be messed with. I wondered why his FB and Twitter accounts are gregbrannon2014 but not his official campaign domain. Anyway, I own it now and will set up a redirector to his official page soon.

Awesome!

Donating later this weekend.
 
1043985_10151839111620432_654276113_n.jpg
 
Come on guys. I've got two of these thread open so I'm down for $200 if you donate, but so far wer're only at $25.
 
"As a Christian, I believe marriage is between one man and one woman.

For years, activists have been attempting to use the federal government to force individual states and citizens to accept their view of same-sex marriage.

Unfortunately, the Obama Administration stopped enforcing the Defense of Marriage Act.

The Defense of Marriage Act was enacted in 1996 to stop Big Government in Washington from re-defining marriage and forcing its definition on the States. The Defense of Marriage Act prevents places like San Francisco and New York City from imposing their definition of marriage on North Carolina.

The Obama Administration’s actions are not only an assault on traditional marriage, but show a profound lack of respect for the Constitution and the Rule of Law.

If elected to the U.S. Senate, I pledge to do everything I can to stop bureaucrats and unelected judges from imposing their definition of marriage on the people of North Carolina."

Does not compute. Stop bureaucrats and unelected judges from even having a say in it then I'll contribute.

I'm sorry but putting one issue beyond individual sovereignty for personal religious beliefs doesn't do it for me. I'm sure he vote for Amendment One. SMFH.
 
Last edited:
For years, activists have been attempting to use the federal government to force individual states and citizens to accept their view of same-sex marriage.

And what of those activists that attempt to use the federal government to force individual citizens to accept it's view of opposite sex marriage?
 
Wooooooooooh!!

Was feeling like hitting a couple of keys on the keyboard might be too much tonight, but I was wrong. Dead wrong.

Thank you!
Thank you for your generous donation!


Amount: $25.00
Transaction ID: ch_26jvsS2m41EA7w
Transaction date/time: 2013-06-29 17:03:42
 
So Gregg needs 17k to meet his goal.
 
Thank you for your generous donation!

Amount: $100.00
Transaction ID: ch_26oCRfvRT8XXXX
Transaction date/time: 2013-06-29 21:28:36
Just got back from my day long C4L seminar so this is my first glance at a pc since this morning. Anyways, I highly suggest that everyone attend the 8 hr course when one comes your way, they're so informative and filled with intellectual and political ammo that RINOs don't want you to have.
 
Does not compute. Stop bureaucrats and unelected judges from even having a say in it then I'll contribute.

I'm sorry but putting one issue beyond individual sovereignty for personal religious beliefs doesn't do it for me. I'm sure he vote for Amendment One. SMFH.

I knew that some of the liberals here on Ron Paul forums might have a problem with Brannon. But the Constitutional Conservatives and libertarians seem to like him a lot. He seems to at least be every bit as good as Rand.
 
I knew that some of the liberals here on Ron Paul forums might have a problem with Brannon. But the Constitutional Conservatives and libertarians seem to like him a lot. He seems to at least be every bit as good as Rand.

I'm not sure he's a lib, but he's apparently got sucked into the gay marriage/abortion swamp. Let's say Barry Goldwater was running again somehow and knowing that he was pro-choice, I'm going to vote for him regardless. I don't get suckered into a phony argument like boobus would.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure he's a lib, but he's apparently got sucked into the gay marriage/abortion swamp. Let's say Barry Goldwater was running again somehow and knowing that he was pro-choice, I'm going to vote for him regardless. I don't get suckered into a phony argument like boobus would.

I assume he has found that it is important to his constituents and himself personally (gay marriage). As far as a political issue, I find it more a typical diversion from more important issues. Best not to get involved, IMHO.
 
Back
Top