GOP releases bills to repeal and replace ObamaCare

Secondly, I don't believe people could just pop up and sign up for ObamaCare. There was an enrollment period. If you didn't sign up then, you were SOL for the rest of the year.
Correct, that was one of the bones offered to insurance companies to go along with Obamacare. I haven't heard if there's any such thing with the new plan.
 
This is bad. Republicans are going to pay a heavy price for this.

IMHO the only reason people vote for the left is to punish the GOP. The people in office are so afraid of the media spin that they're trying to cater to the center, which is too far left. Nobody sent them to Washington to fix it. They were sent to repeal it.

But once again the voters don't really get any say.
 
As usual Rand is in our corner on this. The GOP are just making it ObamaCare Lite.
 
You do agree that the maintenance of power is the primary objective for the Democratic Party as well, right?

I don't agree. The Democratic party has regularly done things, recently, which are harmful to their ability to gain/keep power. That's what I mean when I say that they are more concerned with pleasing the loudest among them. Many of the positions they've taken ostracize / turn off more people than they attract.

I can't think of something off the top of my head which the Democrats proposed recently which went directly against their party's supposed values in a manner similar to this bill.
 
Last edited:
I didn't parse the entire bill but I have a question, if anyone knows. Wasn't the original Obamacare bill about 2000 pages of legislation? Does this bill repeal that 2000 pages and the mess of Code of Federal Regulations created or does it only change the mandate and tax/fine sections and leave everything else exactly the same?
 
Insurance companies can limit your reimbursment by bogging you down in bureaucracy. This is the trend. Coverage for "pre-existing conditions" is meaningless. They sold this lie. It's classic de facto versus de jure.

The simple fact is insurance companies scooped up the non-covered people to enrich themselves. The ONLY thing someone needs to know about this law order is that you are required to buy a product. Saying that It's good because everybody is now covered is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard in my life.
 
I didn't parse the entire bill but I have a question, if anyone knows. Wasn't the original Obamacare bill about 2000 pages of legislation? Does this bill repeal that 2000 pages and the mess of Code of Federal Regulations created or does it only change the mandate and tax/fine sections and leave everything else exactly the same?

More the latter, it appears.
 
Does this bill repeal that 2000 pages and the mess of Code of Federal Regulations created or does it only change the mandate and tax/fine sections and leave everything else exactly the same?


They'll simply play a shell game, just like this puzzle:


Six-of-one-half-a-dozen-of-the-other.png
 
Does this bill repeal that 2000 pages and the mess of Code of Federal Regulations created or does it only change the mandate and tax/fine sections and leave everything else exactly the same?
The second one.


Side note, I read recently that the 'guidance' and regulations from the managing agencies is even longer than the bill itself.
 
I like the one sentence Bills.

"A Bill, to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and all of it's provisions, without amendments."

Vote: Up, down and on the record.
 
...watching some dipstick named Buddy Carter (R-Ga) on Fox right now defending the bill.

"O, no, we're not giving people an entitlement," he says, "we're just rewarding people for buying health insurance."

...right, right

And food stamps are a reward for eating.

:rolleyes:
 
I don't agree. The Democratic party has regularly done things, recently, which are harmful to their ability to gain/keep power. That's what I mean when I say that they are more concerned with pleasing the loudest among them. Many of the positions they've taken ostracize / turn off more people than they attract.

I can't think of something off the top of my head which the Democrats proposed recently which went directly against their party's supposed values in a manner similar to this bill.

The Democratic Party might have done some things accidently that have harmed their ability to keep power. But not on purpose.

I do agree that the Republican Party is somewhat more hypocritical than the Democratic Party. Many times Republicans will say the right things about liberty and free markets but do the opposite when they get in power. Democrats, on the other hand, believe in less liberty and more socialism and they usually honor their promises when they get in power. I'm not sure which is worse.
 
Question about this 30% surcharge for lapsed coverage...

Is the bill allowing insurers to charge this (they aren't allowed to do that now?), or requiring them to do it?

...can't find a straight answer.
 
Back
Top