Google Pulls Parler as Apple Threatens the Same in Wake of Capitol Riot

[DamianTV]

Amazon just booted them too from AWS.

 

[phill4paul]

Reddit bans and removes entire r/DonaldTrump community

https://newsthud.com/big-tech-purge-reddit-bans-and-removes-entire-r-donaldtrump-community/

 

[Brian4Liberty]

“Inciting violence”.

How many years have leftists been inciting and encouraging violence and riots on social media? How many Democrats and leftist pundits celebrated the violent and potentially fatal attack on Rand Paul?

 

[DamianTV]

The word "Republic" comes from two Latin words, Res and Publica. "Thing Public", which is THE LAW and it is supposed to apply to everyone equally. It obviously does not today, and we truly have Lawlessness, thus chaos.

 

[dannno]

and a Congresswoman wrote a response to it a Day before it happened.(prior Knowledge)

Which one? Pretty sure Romney did too, and many others.

 

[pcosmar]

Which one? Pretty sure Romney did too, and many others.

Cori Bush

Resolution Condemning it was written a day in advance.=Prior Knowledge.

 

[misterx]

Parler is being held accountable for the content of user posts on their platform?


Huh... so... for those upset about this, how do you feel about section 230? Just wondering.

I've said all along that repealing section 230 seems counterproductive. I'm curious, for people like you who think it's ok to blacklist conservatives, is it also ok to blacklist African Americans?

 

[pcosmar]

Cori Bush

Resolution Condemning it was written a day in advance.=Prior Knowledge.

 

[TheCount]

.

That is a completely different thing. It's about the objections to the electoral count, nothing else.

 

[TheCount]

I've said all along that repealing section 230 seems counterproductive. I'm curious, for people like you who think it's ok to blacklist conservatives, is it also ok to blacklist African Americans?

Depends what you mean by 'ok' Just because I support a company's ability to do it doesn't mean that I think that it should be done or is a good idea.


If someone wants to make a whites only clone of twitter, they can. (Arguable that Gab is already exactly that de facto) What will happen, though, is that they will just end up crying that they cannot force anyone else to host them, handle their financial transactions, etc. Which is exactly what is happening in this case.



(PS: Nobody has blacklisted 'conservatives.' The thing that is causing people to be banned from Twitter, or for Parler to be shunned, is not 'conservatism.')

 

[phill4paul]

Parler Admits They are Beholden to Bezos, Needing Amazon’s Servers to Operate Their Social Media Platform

The conservative social media platform, Parler, is already on its last legs, as the platform’s developers relied upon Big Tech to provide their infrastructure.

Parler CEO John Matze had claimed that there were a bunch of competitors vying to host the social media site. However, the notion of a free market is laughable with a handful of far-left tech monopolies dominating the world, and he was forced to admit the awful truth in a Fox News interview.


“They all work together to make sure at the same time we would lose access to not only our apps, but they are actually shutting all of our servers off tonight, off the internet,” Matze explained.

“They made an attempt to not only kill the apps, but also destroy the entire company… Every vendor from text message services to email providers to lawyers all ditched us too on the same day,” he added.

Matze said that Parler is pretty much doomed because of the Orwellian super-structure that has been put into place to destroy all potential competition.

“We’re going to try our best, ya know, to get back online as quickly as possible but we’re having a lot of trouble because every vendor we talk to won’t work with us because if Apple doesn’t approve and Google doesn’t approve, they won’t,” he said.

“Amazon is the largest cloud storage vendor in the world, and we use them to host our servers. Hundreds of them. Hundreds of servers. And they gave us basically, they said, you have 24 hours to get all of your data and find new servers. So, where are you going to find 300 to 500 servers in a 24-hour window, and how can you send all of the data from everybody out to them in a 24-hour period? It’s an impossible feat,” Matze explained.

While Parler foolishly relied on Big Tech to be the backbone of their entire operation, other social media providers, such as Gab, understood the problem way in advance and developed sustainable infrastructure while Parler was busy courting e-celebs.

“After over four years of work building a digital Noah’s Ark to defend free speech online, Gab is finally hitting its stride and we are well on our way to becoming a new media giant that empowers all voices to speak freely and experience the free flow of information,” said Andrew Torba, the founder of Gab.

Right now, Torba is making the pitch for President Donald Trump to join Gab, believing his is the only platform ready to sustain a figure as important and controversial as 45.

“This is a coup on our country by foreigner-run Big Tech companies,” Torba said. “It must not stand. Something must be done and at Gab we are building solutions. The government has done nothing and will do nothing. No one is coming to save us. We must save ourselves.”

“Our task is not an easy one, but neither was the task of our Founding Fathers. We must fight to defend free speech on the internet now more than ever,” Torba added. “Our country, and indeed the world, depends on it. Our children are counting on us to rise to the occasion and defend freedom just as so many have done before us.”

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/parle...rvers-to-operate-their-social-media-platform/

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Depends what you mean by 'ok' Just because I support a company's ability to do it doesn't mean that I think that it should be done or is a good idea.


If someone wants to make a whites only clone of twitter, they can. (Arguable that Gab is already exactly that de facto) What will happen, though, is that they will just end up crying that they cannot force anyone else to host them, handle their financial transactions, etc. Which is exactly what is happening in this case.



(PS: Nobody has blacklisted 'conservatives.' The thing that is causing people to be banned from Twitter, or for Parler to be shunned, is not 'conservatism.')

Ok. Why are people being banned from Twitter?

 

[TheCount]

Ok. Why are people being banned from Twitter?

People get banned from Twitter all the time for all sorts of reasons.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Good

And for those yelling about the first amendment, try reading it.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

People get banned from Twitter all the time for all sorts of reasons.

Including “conservatism” then, if conservatism on any issue is in opposition to the DNC-Twitter party line.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Good

And for those yelling about the first amendment, try reading it.

Bye.

 

[CaptUSA]

Bye.

Well, you're certainly proving their point.


Seriously, though, this may be one of those things that people won't get until it happens to them. I'm still hopeful that there's a way through this without violating voluntary association.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Well, you're certainly proving their point.


Seriously, though, this may be one of those things that people won't get until it happens to them. I'm still hopeful that there's a way through this without violating voluntary association.

I am well aware that one of the tactics of trolls is to provoke their own banning and then play victim, and often lie about the circumstances of their banning. The goal is to be able to throw out the accusation of hypocrisy.

At this point, there is no more need to play games with trolls, and those who never supported Ron Paul.

 

[CaptUSA]

I am well aware that one of the tactics of trolls is to provoke their own banning and then play victim, and often lie about the circumstances of their banning. The goal is to be able to throw out the accusation of hypocrisy.

At this point, there is no more need to play games with trolls, and those who never supported Ron Paul.

Where was this Brian 2 years ago?!

 

[DamianTV]

Look, if youre BLM you wont be silenced. Hell, its fine to run around, riot, destroy property, burn buildings, and even MURDER. If youre arrested you wont be charged. Thats called a fucking AGENT PROVACATEUR. Pose as your enemy and incite Mob Think and burn shit. They WANT violence.

But if we stick up for ourselves, then WE are the violent terrorists. The weight of the word "terrorist" has been lost.

Now, lets throw in some Antifa and we can see that it had NOTHING to do with Real Patriots, but ANTIFA posing as Patriots. They DID NOT CHARGE in the front door, they were LET IN. Then they start their shit. More AGENT PROVACATEURS.

They wont examine evidence of Election Fraud, and they wont examine evidence of who these people were that trashed the Capitol Building. Patriots were in there picking up trash and the shit they were doing, but that makes us bad people because those are important immigrant jobs, right? Patriots are already guilty by accusation and thats how its gonna go.

This is FASCISM.

Apple and Google and Amazon run most of our govt. Except Trump. He cant really be bought out, but he can be betrayed. Im not saying that Trump not being buyable means he is that honest. I think he has done some truly chauvenistic shit in his past. Thats not what I am concerned about right now. What I am concerned about is our Fascist Govt coming after EVERY PATRIOT.

ALL OF US. EXECUTION. BLACK BAGGED IN THE NIGHT. ITS HERE. NOW. TYRANNY.