• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


How Silicon Valley, in a Show of Monopolistic Force, Destroyed Parler - RonPaulInstitute.org

DamianTV

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2007
Messages
20,667
http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arc...-show-of-monopolistic-force-destroyed-parler/
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/how-silicon-valley-in-a-show-of-monopolistic

Critics of Silicon Valley censorship for years heard the same refrain: tech platforms like Facebook, Google and Twitter are private corporations and can host or ban whoever they want. If you don’t like what they are doing, the solution is not to complain or to regulate them. Instead, go create your own social media platform that operates the way you think it should.

The founders of Parler heard that suggestion and tried. In August, 2018, they created a social media platform similar to Twitter but which promised far greater privacy protections, including a refusal to aggregate user data in order to monetize them to advertisers or algorithmically evaluate their interests in order to promote content or products to them. They also promised far greater free speech rights, rejecting the increasingly repressive content policing of Silicon Valley giants.

Over the last year, Parler encountered immense success. Millions of people who objected to increasing repression of speech on the largest platforms or who had themselves been banned signed up for the new social media company.

As Silicon Valley censorship radically escalated over the past several months — banning pre-election reporting by The New York Post about the Biden family, denouncing and deleting multiple posts from the US President and then terminating his access altogether, mass-removal of right-wing accounts — so many people migrated to Parler that it was catapulted to the number one spot on the list of most-downloaded apps on the Apple Play Store, the sole and exclusive means which iPhone users have to download apps. “Overall, the app was the 10th most downloaded social media app in 2020 with 8.1 million new installs,” reported TechCrunch.

It looked as if Parler had proven critics of Silicon Valley monopolistic power wrong. Their success showed that it was possible after all to create a new social media platform to compete with Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. And they did so by doing exactly what Silicon Valley defenders long insisted should be done: if you don’t like the rules imposed by tech giants, go create your own platform with different rules.

But today, if you want to download, sign up for, or use Parler, you will be unable to do so. That is because three Silicon Valley monopolies — Amazon, Google and Apple — abruptly united to remove Parler from the internet, exactly at the moment when it became the most-downloaded app in the country.

If one were looking for evidence to demonstrate that these tech behemoths are, in fact, monopolies that engage in anti-competitive behavior in violation of antitrust laws, and will obliterate any attempt to compete with them in the marketplace, it would be difficult to imagine anything more compelling than how they just used their unconstrained power to utterly destroy a rising competitor.

...

Full article at 2nd Link.

---

Perhaps we should try to encourage reasonable people to set up an acct HERE?
 
This is just the beginning. Silicon Valley will be going after everybody that does not have a liberal ideology.
 
Parler should have:

1. Hired a skilled operations team to begin with.
2. self-hosted with 3+ ISPs that have demonstrated they support free speech, at least 1 outside the USA.
3. avoided AWS like the plague.
4. avoided cloudflare like the plague.
5. setup fail2ban for some basic dos/ddos protections.
5. setup multiple domain names, with multiple registrars.

imho, that's just good advice for any commercial site, but especially one that is engaging in any sort of controversial activity.

In the "bad old days" web companies employed an operations team that were skilled at the above. Today they seem to just blindly trust amazon and the internet's biggest man-in-the-middle attacker, ie CloudFlare and pretend that "devops" is a good thing.

I figure Parler is learning this lesson the hard way, and probably doing the steps above now if they plan to continue operations.
 
This is just the beginning. Silicon Valley will be going after everybody that does not have a liberal ideology.

Lets define "Liberal".

Just like the definition of the word Privacy has been altered to no longer mean "Privacy is hiding something Right" to "Privacy is hiding something you have done wrong". Most importantly that definition has been altered at a SUBCONSCIOUS LEVEL. Liberal has also had its definition altered. Liberal means different things to different people. A classic "Liberal" would support "Liberty", which is where the word comes from. Today those who are not in positions of power still believe this. Those are your average Democratic voters. Then there are the "Liberals" in charge. Their ACTIONS really define what they are. They wear the LABEL of "Liberal" in order to affect the voters perceptions of them. But make NO MISTAKE they are NOT DEMOCRATS. They are full scale hard core COMMUNISTS. They tell you one thing, then do what ever the hell they want. And I think as many people have just learned with the GOP betraying Trump, is many of these "Liberals" are REPUBLICANS.

Change of topic for two seconds. IF this were a "true Representative Democracy" as described on paper, then if 0% of the population supported a bill, then 0% would vote for a bill. Likewise, if 100% of the people supported a bill, then 100% of our representatives would vote FOR that bill. But that is not what we see happening. This is quite evident on things people have publicly felt very strongly about. What we DO see is about 30% of all bills are passed. It seems to operate without rhyme or reason. We hate this bill! 30%. We love that bill! 30%. And that holds true until you get to the top 1%. THEN and ONLY THEN do we see the operations of a Representative Democracy, where 100% of rich people want a bill passed then that is what they get. Often times they write it themselves.

When our Representative Democracy only reflects the will of the top 478 richest people in the world, then we do NOT have Democracy, or a Republic, but rather a Plutocratic Oligarchy. This is HOW Silicon Valley has gotten the laws passed which only benefit them, and always at your expense. A perfect example of this is Twitter, and how they Perma-Banned Trump, yet, hypocritically opposed to being censored themselves. And that is the thing that people fall for. They want Censorship when they think they wont be the ones being censored. Twitter WANTED Censorship. Or, they want FREE SPEECH for ALL, not just some. Twitter got exactly what it asked for, and are now unhappy with getting what they want. Moral here is for people that support Censorship, how well is that gonna work if their expression to call FOR Censorship is BANNED under the very laws they are trying to support?

Twitter and Google and Apple have all abused their power to exercise monopolistic control over ANY and ALL competition. Parler may be the first of MANY, INCLUDING RonPaulForums.com to fall to the many injustices of Censorship and Monopolistic control. For the record, RPF is already banned on Facebook, right? Links to our site have been deemed "dangerous" and we must be censored?

We stand a better chance at surviving because Parler did have its app banned by Apple, but was kicked off of its Web Host: AMAZON. You cant expect an Enemy of Free Speech to allow a platform that opposes its views to be hosted on its servers. Good Job RPF Admins for keeping us alive this long. For how much longer remains to be seen.
 
there is just one word.

decentralize.


Learn about Bitcoin.

Now apply Bitcoin to speech.

this has not been done yet.
 
there is just one word.

decentralize.


Learn about Bitcoin.

Now apply Bitcoin to speech.

this has not been done yet.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?551893-PATCHWORK-decentralized-messaging-and-sharing-app

PATCHWORK - decentralized messaging and sharing app
https://github.com/ssbc/patchwork

Figured some of the tech peeps might be able to help here. Way over my head..



-A decentralized messaging and sharing app built on top of Secure Scuttlebutt (SSB).

-Connect with friends without depending on any central servers.

-Don't worry about spam, you only get messages from people you follow.

-Use Patchwork online or offline, the data you need is stored on your device.

-Sync messages with friends when you're on the same Wi-Fi network.

-Keep secrets with private messages, which are always end-to-end encrypted.

-Change and improve Patchwork however you'd like, it's free and open source.
 
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?551893-PATCHWORK-decentralized-messaging-and-sharing-app

PATCHWORK - decentralized messaging and sharing app
https://github.com/ssbc/patchwork

Figured some of the tech peeps might be able to help here. Way over my head..



-A decentralized messaging and sharing app built on top of Secure Scuttlebutt (SSB).

-Connect with friends without depending on any central servers.

-Don't worry about spam, you only get messages from people you follow.

-Use Patchwork online or offline, the data you need is stored on your device.

-Sync messages with friends when you're on the same Wi-Fi network.

-Keep secrets with private messages, which are always end-to-end encrypted.

-Change and improve Patchwork however you'd like, it's free and open source.

thx.. I didn't know about it. Asking a friend about it.
 
Back
Top