otherone
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 9,641
and what can be greater then love?
True that, but your love has a price.
and what can be greater then love?
True that, but your love has a price.
And please tell me what my price is.
Fealty. Your God doesn't love unconditionally.
Because Paul met the resurrected Christ. Duh.I find it interesting that some would favor what was allegedly written by St. Paul (who never knew Christ) over the alleged scriptures of three people who did.
I disagree. He does. But love is a relationship. I do not think a God that loves a person who does not love Him back is going to have a very good relationship any more than a husband with an adulterer as a wife.Fealty. Your God doesn't love unconditionally.
I don't believe those books were written by those people, so that sorta ends it...
People who "knew" Christ is irrelevant. For example, Pontius Pilate "knew" Christ "better" than Paul did. But I doubt you'd claim Pilate was more of an authority on Christ than Paul was. What was, and is important, to a church leadership calling is authority. Paul received his calling directly from Jesus Christ and was ordained to his place by proper priesthood authority. That made him equal, if not superior, to anyone else writing based solely on what they thought they understood about Christ's teachings.
I disagree. He does. But love is a relationship.
'Unconditional' means no 'buts'.
it's a little sad some people need to be taught basic logic, huh?
'Unconditional' means no 'buts'. For your God to kill the fatted calf, the prodigal has to RETURN. That your perfect God created an imperfect child (if that is even possible), and then judges him with eternal torment as a potential outcome, is pointlessly cruel. No one asked for this.
It's more a definition than logic, but that isn't my concern. I have no issues with the authenticity of the Bible....it's the message that is highly suspect. If God 'actually' loved us, we never would have been born, we could have been in his presence always. But God is more interested in this game show he calls 'life', where the contestants have to navigate through a lifetime of moral challenges to return to 'Him'. It's twisted.
it's a little sad some people need to be taught basic logic, huh?
You misunderstand the parable. It is clear that the father has unconditional love for the son, but for that love to be in communion and in festive celebration, IT MUST BE RECIPRICAL. Had you had any love for God, then you would understand this.
Do you have children?
So.. Is this an Atheist circlejerk thread? I can't tell..
No, I 'get' the parable. What I DON'T read in the parable is the part where the father, if his son does NOT return, finds him, flays off his skin, and slow-roasts him forever. What is the result if we prodigals don't return? This is your God, who loves you 'unconditionally'. The carrot is lovely, especially as compared to the stick. And there is no need to get personal, btw.
Yes. Two. A son (25), and a daughter (23). Why?