NickOdell
Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2011
- Messages
- 507
I've always said I don't believe the federal government should or even has a right to be involved in social issues or questions of morality. The enumerated powers given to the federal government by the Constitution are very clear and limited.
I do believe that government does have a role to play in defending morality, but that it should be done at the most local level possible and I believe that private individuals, organizations, and corporations should do most of the regulating themselves.
Which is it? What's the difference?
I understand the local vs Federal argument, but why do you want the government to legislate morality at any level?
Last edited: