George Zimmerman Verdict: NOT GUILTY!

[Anti Federalist]

WoD

Big part of the problem right there.

 

[AuH20]

Or how much violent crime committed against whites, is committed by blacks.

Oh boy...now you've gone and done it...

Black-on-black crime is an epidemic but kept hush-hush. Yet somewhere we're supposed to believe that that community watch organizations around America are swallowing innocent blacks whole. It's bullshit and shrewd political misdirection.

 

[Kregisen]

Over a period of time- HOWEVER SHORT.

What you yourself quoted to us CLEARLY says a "series of acts". You are insane if you think any judge would label following someone for a few minutes in your neighborhood a "series of acts". This is also obviously why the state isn't prosecuting Zimmerman on this charge.....

I mean seriously....think.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Black-on-black crime is an epidemic but kept hush-hush. Yet somewhere we're supposed to believe that that community watch organizations around America are swallowing innocent blacks whole. It's bullshit and shrewd political misdirection.

Of course it is, comrade, but some things are just not talked about...

 

[juleswin]

Or how much violent crime committed against whites, is committed by blacks.

Oh boy...now you've gone and done it...

And those people are arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law as they should be. I bet you a million buck that no black person killing a white person is let go by the justice system. The ones that are caught are hit with everything plus the kitchen sink and they pay dearly for their crimes.

So why even bring it up? The same goes for black on black crimes, no black person is getting away scott free if the system gets in contact with them. Now I would agree that bit of information is relevant to this case if black on black attackers are given a pass by the justice system.

 

[Ender]

What you yourself quoted to us CLEARLY says a "series of acts". You are insane if you think any judge would label following someone for a few minutes in your neighborhood a "series of acts". This is also obviously why the state isn't prosecuting Zimmerman on this charge.....

I mean seriously....think.

Your turn to think.

The law is stated in such a way to protect people- especially women- from being stalked. Some stalking is a series of events over days or weeks- some stalking can take place in one evening. This means the "stalker" can follow someone and if they fear for their lives, it can be considered stalking.

 

[AuH20]

And those people are arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law as they should be. I bet you a million buck that no black person killing a white person is let go by the justice system. The ones that are caught are hit with everything plus the kitchen sink and they pay dearly for their crimes.

So why even bring it up? The same goes for black on black crimes, no black person is getting away scott free if the system gets in contact with them. Now I would agree that bit of information is relevant to this case if black on black attackers are given a pass by the justice system.

I think the greater question is? Why are blacks, especially those in urban areas, proportionally more predisposed to committing a criminal act than the general pop? And there are a myriad of factors. Single parent households. Generational Poverty. Lack of pride which ties into the bigotry of low expectations promoted by the government. Drugs being pumped into these urban areas by federales. Many of these cities are a breeding ground for criminals.

 

[Bastiat's The Law]

90 percent of black crime is perpetuated upon black citizens, yet we haven't heard a peep about this stunning trend. Instead it's manifested into a concerted attack on 2nd amendment advocates.

That way you don't get uppity when they shove their marxism down your throat.

 

[Sergeant Brother]

And those people are arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law as they should be. I bet you a million buck that no black person killing a white person is let go by the justice system. The ones that are caught are hit with everything plus the kitchen sink and they pay dearly for their crimes.

So why even bring it up? The same goes for black on black crimes, no black person is getting away scott free if the system gets in contact with them. Now I would agree that bit of information is relevant to this case if black on black attackers are given a pass by the justice system.

Would you like to send the $1,000,000 to my PayPal account or as a check?

 

[AuH20]

That way you don't get uppity when they shove their marxism down your throat.

Well, homey don't play that.

 

[HigherVision]

And those people are arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law as they should be. I bet you a million buck that no black person killing a white person is let go by the justice system. The ones that are caught are hit with everything plus the kitchen sink and they pay dearly for their crimes.

Not so much these days, at least not in Seattle where they have something called the "Race and Social Justice Initiative". It's basically a system where blacks and minorities are either given light sentences or not prosecuted for crimes in order to even out racial discrepancies in the crime rates.

 

[AuH20]

That way you don't get uppity when they shove their marxism down your throat.

Also, how are they killing each other in predominantly anti-gun zones? I can't get my head around it.

 

[Bastiat's The Law]

I think the greater question is? Why are blacks, especially those in urban areas, proportionally more predisposed to committing a criminal act than the general pop? And there are a myriad of factors. Single parent households. Generational Poverty. Lack of pride which ties into the bigotry of low expectations promoted by the government. Drugs being pumped into these urban areas by federales. Many of these cities are a breeding ground for criminals.

I think the most significant factor was the breakdown of the family and the government taking over that role. Charles Murray writes extensively on this issue, check out his work. Adam Carrolla also hit on it when he took on Gavin Newsom and the Huffington Post.

 

[Anti Federalist]

And those people are arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law as they should be. I bet you a million buck that no black person killing a white person is let go by the justice system. The ones that are caught are hit with everything plus the kitchen sink and they pay dearly for their crimes.

So why even bring it up? The same goes for black on black crimes, no black person is getting away scott free if the system gets in contact with them. Now I would agree that bit of information is relevant to this case if black on black attackers are given a pass by the justice system.

I'd suggest you go and look at rate of solved homicide cases in any major city.

National clearance rates for murder and manslaughter have fallen from about 90 percent in the 1960s to below 65 percent in recent years

http://www.timesrecordnews.com/news/2010/may/24/unsolved-homicides/

There is something sinister going on behind the scenes here...

We are all presented, daily, with stories of heavily armed raiders, storming into the hovel of some "bad guy" to drag them off to "justice".

We assume that there is, in fact a vigorous, if over zealous police force, working around the clock, to "throw the book" at violent offenders.

But that's just not the case.

Thousands of violent crimes go unsolved every year.

Thousands more of innocent people go to jail as well. Most of them are black. Which, of course, adds to the compounding problem of crime in the black community.

The only people I see "getting the book thrown at them" are non violent drug offenders.

Oh, and of course, the politicals.

 

[kahless]

All I have to do post all your answers, kahless, and my point will be proved.

You will find my posts promote individual liberty over the statism you are promoting. I have been staying out of this debate and only spoke out because of you and several other posters spamming these threads with statist propaganda.

Here is a good example:

- Your disparaging the concept of a private individual observing his community for crime prevention purposes in favor of official law enforcement.

- Complaining that Zimmerman was not a member of an official "national neighborhood watch".

- Promoting violation of the non-aggression principle. Posts believing that if the above occurs that the person being followed has a right to attack the follower or observer.

- Stating that there is no risk of death or injury if a stranger is on top of your beating you MMA style. Promoting in this instance that individuals do not have right of self defense and must allow themselves to be beaten waiting for official law enforcement.

- Repeated posts complaining that Zimmerman did not follow the advice of a government dispatcher at a non-emergency number.

 

[dannno]

You will find my posts promote individual liberty over the statism you are promoting. I have been staying out of this debate and only spoke out because of you and several other posters spamming these threads with statist propaganda.

Here is a good example:

- Your disparaging the concept of a private individual observing his community for crime prevention purposes in favor of official law enforcement.

- Complaining that Zimmerman was not a member of an official "national neighborhood watch".

- Promoting violation of the non-aggression principle. Posts believing that if the above occurs that the person being followed has a right to attack the follower or observer.

- Stating that there is no risk of death or injury if a stranger is on top of your beating you MMA style. Promoting in this instance that individuals do not have right of self defense and must allow themselves to be beaten waiting for official law enforcement.

- Repeated posts complaining that Zimmerman did not follow the advice of a government dispatcher at a non-emergency number.

+rep

 

[juleswin]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=5124613
Would you like to send the $1,000,000 to my PayPal account or as a check?

Good one, you got me on that and as a man of my words, I will have to pay up. But OJ Simpson's case is what we in the business call an exception to the rule. Its like seeing a legless lizard or a flightless bird or a hairless mammal etc etc, they are not supposed to happen but yet we see them in nature.

But technically, I did not say I will pay you in dollars so why not give me your address so I can send you 1 million monopoly bucks

 

[Anti Federalist]

I think the greater question is? Why are blacks, especially those in urban areas, proportionally more predisposed to committing a criminal act than the general pop? And there are a myriad of factors. Single parent households. Generational Poverty. Lack of pride which ties into the bigotry of low expectations promoted by the government. Drugs being pumped into these urban areas by federales. Many of these cities are a breeding ground for criminals.

A source, over 10 years old now, but these numbers remain fairly predictable.

Felony Sentences in State Courts, 2000

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/ascii/Fssc00.txt

* Drug offenders were 34.6% of felons convicted in State courts
in 2000. Property offenders made up 28.3%; violent offenders,
18.7%; and those convicted of weapon offenses and other
nonviolent crimes made up the rest (18.4%).

 

[Kregisen]

You will find my posts promote individual liberty over the statism you are promoting. I have been staying out of this debate and only spoke out because of you and several other posters spamming these threads with statist propaganda.

Here is a good example:

- Your disparaging the concept of a private individual observing his community for crime prevention purposes in favor of official law enforcement.

- Complaining that Zimmerman was not a member of an official "national neighborhood watch".

- Promoting violation of the non-aggression principle. Posts believing that if the above occurs that the person being followed has a right to attack the follower or observer.

- Stating that there is no risk of death or injury if a stranger is on top of your beating you MMA style. Promoting in this instance that individuals do not have right of self defense and must allow themselves to be beaten waiting for official law enforcement.

- Repeated posts complaining that Zimmerman did not follow the advice of a government dispatcher at a non-emergency number.

BOOM.

It was very hard to tell at first, but it's pretty obvious that Ender is trolling people here to waste our time for no reason at all. Obviously he knows the evidence points to Martin being the aggressor and Zimmerman fearing for his life. And obviously he knows that the only way Zimmerman can be found guilty in a court of law is if there is evidence "beyond a reasonable doubt", which does not come close to existing.

This is why this issue needs to be done with. Not worth wasting time over, no matter how many times Ender posts the same shit.

 

[Bastiat's The Law]

Also, how are they killing each other in predominantly anti-gun zones? I can't get my head around it.

Have you ever watched The Wire?