Gary Johnson 2016 over the hillaries(hillary/trump)!!Spread the websites far and wide

Pure? To be clear, what/who is being promoting in the name of activism is a candidate whose position is patently contrary to the primary foundation for the principles of Individual Liberty itself. We're not talking about pure here. We're talking about the primary fundamentals. We're talking about the fundamental principles of Individual Liberty here. The nuts and bolts. Promoting a philosophy that is patently contrary to them is nothing to LOL about. It really isn't. I think it's rather disturbing that you disregard the principles to the extent that you LOL about them. I mean, that's a major naw naw.

Versus pouting in the corner and waiting another 4 years to wake Americans up... Thanks, but I will go with the small step in the right direction instead of shooting myself in the foot to wait for the right time to stand up. Ok, bye bye...
 
Ah well. I'm going to go weed my flower beds.

Just don't forget relevant priorities is all I'm saying. I get that people are upset because we've lost elections in the past. I do. I understand that people want to contribute. They want to feel like they're part of something. They want to feel significant. But I see no logical reason or benefit in trading the primary foundation for the principles of Individual Liberty for a label in an election that you're going to lose anyway. To say it's based on principle is bunk. If it is, then, it's premised upon the wrong principles given that the candidate's philosophy that you're endorsing in the name of Liberty (as a houshold name, no less) is patently contrary to the very foundation that establishes Individual Liberty.

Just know, though, that if you don't think things through, then, you may well end up selling yourself the very rope that you'll surely hang by. Be careful. Don't be misled by people who are content only to count their names. It is best to leave your mark. But it has to be the right mark. And a mark left for the right reasons. And one left on the more relevant and worthy field of battle.

You folks have a good day.
 
Last edited:
Ah well. I'm going to go weed my flower beds.

Just don't forget relevant priorities is all I'm saying. I get that people are upset because we've lost elections in the past. I do. I understand that eople want to contribute. They want to feel like they're part of something. They want to feel significant. But I see no logical reason or benefit in trading the primary foundation for the principles of Individual Liberty for a label in an election that you're going to lose anyway. To say it's based on principle is bunk. If it is, then, it's premised upon the wrong principles given that the candidate's philosophy that you're endorsing in the name of Liberty (as a houshold name, no less) is patently contrary to the very foundation that establishes Individual Liberty.

Just know, though, that if you don't think things through, then, you may well end up selling yourself the very rope that you'll surely hang by. Be careful. Don't be misled by people who are content only to count their names. It is best to leave your mark. But it has to be the right mark. And a mark left for the right reasons.

You folks have a good day.

It is a stepping stone in the right direction. Is it the shore of Liberty? Nope. But a stepping stone we should use to get to the shore of Liberty. Using your attitude, we will be pushing up daisies in your flower bed before we see any more Liberty in our Lifetime. And he does have a chance with all the Bern victims, Hillary haters and Trump adverse. I want to seize this first time ever opportunity to make some headway, instead of pacing on the short of despair waiting for the right ship or right stepping stone to appear. Good day as well.
 
Ah well. I'm going to go weed my flower beds.

Just don't forget relevant priorities is all I'm saying. I get that people are upset because we've lost elections in the past. I do. I understand that people want to contribute. They want to feel like they're part of something. They want to feel significant. But I see no logical reason or benefit in trading the primary foundation for the principles of Individual Liberty for a label in an election that you're going to lose anyway. To say it's based on principle is bunk. If it is, then, it's premised upon the wrong principles given that the candidate's philosophy that you're endorsing in the name of Liberty (as a houshold name, no less) is patently contrary to the very foundation that establishes Individual Liberty.

Just know, though, that if you don't think things through, then, you may well end up selling yourself the very rope that you'll surely hang by. Be careful. Don't be misled by people who are content only to count their names. It is best to leave your mark. But it has to be the right mark. And a mark left for the right reasons. And one left on the more relevant and worthy field of battle.

You folks have a good day.

Well said.

Johnson reminds me of Glenn Beck.

Besides Liberty doesn't come from a man.
 
Ah well. I'm going to go weed my flower beds.

Just don't forget relevant priorities is all I'm saying. I get that people are upset because we've lost elections in the past. I do. I understand that people want to contribute. They want to feel like they're part of something. They want to feel significant. But I see no logical reason or benefit in trading the primary foundation for the principles of Individual Liberty for a label in an election that you're going to lose anyway. To say it's based on principle is bunk. If it is, then, it's premised upon the wrong principles given that the candidate's philosophy that you're endorsing in the name of Liberty (as a houshold name, no less) is patently contrary to the very foundation that establishes Individual Liberty.

Just know, though, that if you don't think things through, then, you may well end up selling yourself the very rope that you'll surely hang by. Be careful. Don't be misled by people who are content only to count their names. It is best to leave your mark. But it has to be the right mark. And a mark left for the right reasons. And one left on the more relevant and worthy field of battle.

You folks have a good day.

Well said.

Johnson reminds me of Glenn Beck.

Besides Liberty doesn't come from a man.

Indeed. Out of rep for NC.:(
 
we are now 2% from getting gary on the debate stage. spread these websites, www.trumphoon.com and www.hitlary.com, working on radio ads to run in denver and the co mtns, keep up the good work for anyone doing what they can to make change!! Gary can Win. Gary has to Win, WE ALL LOSE WITH hillary or trump(hillary with a phallus)!!!
 
Include Gary Johnson in national Presidential polls

https://www.change.org/p/cnn-include-gary-johnson-in-national-presidential-polls

The Commission on Presidential Debates determines whether or not a candidate can be included in the debates based on their performance in five selected national polls. In order to be included in the debates, a candidate must be polling at 15% nationwide. We, the undersigned, believe that Governor Gary Johnson, the Libertarian nominee for President has a chance to reach that threshold. A recent Fox News poll found Gov. Johnson to have 12% support nationwide and his mainstream media exposure in recent weeks has been unprecedented for a Libertarian Presidential candidate, which means that his support has likely grown. Paired with the fact that polls have consistently shown Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton to be among the most polarizing candidates in history, we believe that there is a real opportunity this year for a third-party candidate to make a difference. With the Libertarian Party being the only third party likely to appear on the ballot in all fifty states and the political experience of both Gov. Johnson and his running mate, Governor William Weld, we believe that they are the most likely to capitalize on this opportunity. We urge you to include Governor Johnson in your national polling and help give the American voter another option this November.

This petition will be delivered to:
  • CNN
  • Rasmussen Reports
  • ABC
  • CBS
  • Washington Post
  • NBC
  • Wall Street Journal
  • Douglas Schwartz, PhD - Quinnipiac University Poll
  • Bridget Jameson - Pew Research Center
  • USA Today

Over 40,000 signed.
 
If Gary wins just one state, the world turns upside down.

Every stripe of libertarian should see advantage in breaking the two party duopoly, in destroying forever the "don't waste your vote" narrative.

We can go back to tearing each other to pieces after November 8, okay, but for now let's try winning, for once, shall we?
 
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-gary-johnson-fundraiser-20160724-snap-story.html

Libertarian Gary Johnson looks to boost credibility, with a little help from Drew Carey

750x422


The email invitation for a Gary Johnson fundraiser hosted by comic Drew Carey called for a “Libertarian comfortable” dress code, which could have been cause for concern. After all, just two months ago, at the Libertarian Party convention, a portly man stripped down to his skivvies and danced onstage for two minutes, with C-SPAN cameras capturing every move.

But on Saturday night, in Carey’s Mediterranean-style villa, “Libertarian comfortable” meant mostly blazers, jeans and cocktail dresses. There were chi-chi appetizers and American flag-themed name badges and a sprinkling of famous faces.

It was an utterly normal political fundraiser, which may be exactly what Johnson needs to help power his utterly abnormal bid to win the White House as a third-party candidate.

The fundraiser marked a milestone of sorts for Johnson, who is striving to propel his candidacy, and his party, from the margins to the mainstream. When he last ran for president, in 2012, he certainly wasn’t standing in a well-known television personality’s backyard, eating vanilla ice cream and snapping photos with admirers.

“Nothing could compare,” he said. “Nothing.”

Libertarians sense enormous opportunity in this year of enormously unpopular major party candidates. But Johnson, a former GOP governor of New Mexico, remains far behind in name recognition and fundraising; it is far from clear if he’ll get the 15% in polls which would qualify him for the presidential debates in the fall.



Johnson’s second shot at the presidency has focused on building legitimacy with the broader electorate: tapping former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld as his running mate, tirelessly working the media circuit, and now, rubbing elbows with celebrities.

“You have to create this notion that you might actually win,” Johnson said. “For a sophisticated few at the moment, there is that recognition. I think that's going to get bigger as you go forward.”

The event’s cohost interjected: "Can we have a Hollywood moment? One of Drew's “Price is Right” models loves you and wants to say a quick hello."

There were several Hollywood moments. Krist Novoselic, the former bassist of Nirvana, made a detour to Los Angeles just for the event, flying into town on his private Piper Saratoga. The “Price is Right” model, Gwendolyn Osborne-Smith, brought her husband, former NBA player and commentator Kenny Smith, who explained he was open to hearing more about Libertarians thanks to his friendship with Carey, the game show’s host.

In all, about 145 people attended the shindig, which planners said would bring in about $100,000 for the campaign. Two founders of separate pro-Johnson super PACs also hobnobbed with the crowd, which including at least one Libertarian-leaning mega-donor, the tomato magnate Chris Rufer.

The courting of deep-pocketed donors may be crucial to Johnson’s chances. His campaign brought in less than $700,000 in June, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission.

Throughout the evening — as refreshments progressed from appetizer-sized chicken and waffles to a buffet of flank steak and roasted heirloom carrots to “homemade pudding shots” at the dessert bar — guests offered different takes on what kind of success the Johnson-Weld ticket could achieve this year.

“I think they can get elected,” said Novoselic. “Miracles happen. I was in a band in 1990. People didn't think that we were ever going to be No. 1 on the Billboard. And then mores change, things go viral.”

Carey, who described himself as politically unenthused until he discovered Libertarianism through Reason magazine, acknowledged that a Johnson victory may be a long shot. But, he said, even swinging the balance in once state might be enough to send a message.

“Then the very best scenario is that people quit treating this country as a two-party country,” he said “and they always include the Libertarian point of view in every single discussion.”



At a question-and-answer session, Johnson laid out that perspective: fiscally conservative, socially liberal, noninterventionist in foreign affairs.

Asked about Islamic State, he took a decidedly nonalarmist tone, asserting that the terrorist group had largely been contained geographically, although he acknowledged that the problem of the group inspiring “lone-wolf” attackers posed a thornier challenge. He vowed to slash taxes and pined for abolishing the IRS “if he could wave a magic wand.”

About the Supreme Court, he was unusually deferential to his vice-presidential pick, saying the judiciary would be Weld’s area of expertise.
Entirely absent were the quirkier queries that dominated the party’s convention, held in Florida, where diehard Libertarians debated the need for driver’s licenses or civil rights legislation.

“This is not like Orlando,” said Kerry Welsh, the event’s co-organizer, who expressed frustration with the party’s “out of the mainstream, wacko types.”
Idiosyncratic reputation aside, Welsh said Libertarianism is more in line with American political sensibilities now than when he first joined the party as a 19-year-old in 1978.

“My whole life, I've been used to people telling me, ‘Boy, Kerry, you have some really crazy views,’” Welsh said, citing his support for legalizing marijuana and same-sex marriage.

“Now my friends say, ‘Kerry, you are really making a lot more sense than you used to make,’” he added. “And I haven't changed a view on one thing in 35 years. So that's a lot of fun.”
 
thanks for posting that. Interesting to hear more Gary Johnson stuff, even if I don't particularly like it.
 
I will never vote for Gary Johnson. Never.

If people are going to write in votes, they should write them in for someone who is actually running, and who will be on some ballots. That would be Darrell Castle. Ron Paul endorsed the ticket he was on as VP in 2008.
 
I will never vote for Gary Johnson. Never.

If people are going to write in votes, they should write them in for someone who is actually running, and who will be on some ballots. That would be Darrell Castle. Ron Paul endorsed the ticket he was on as VP in 2008.

^^Says Trump voter
 
Back
Top