Full Page Ad in the Chicago Tribune about Obama's Birth Certificate

Tomorrow, Dec. 5th, the SCOTUS reviews the case in New Jersey. Let's see if they do their job, or if they're on the take.
 
If they are meeting tommorow because of this that already means it is legit enough for them to consider. I think it will definitly get 1 or 2 votes, if it gets 4... well we will just have to wait and see; will be Very intresting to see what happens if it does.

Actually, what do you guys think would happen if they say Obama can not be president? Does that make McCain president? Are Obama supporters gonna riot?
 
If they are meeting tommorow because of this that already means it is legit enough for them to consider. I think it will definitly get 1 or 2 votes, if it gets 4... well we will just have to wait and see; will be Very intresting to see what happens if it does.

Actually, what do you guys think would happen if they say Obama can not be president? Does that make McCain president? Are Obama supporters gonna riot?


If the SCOTUS refuses to hear the case, then what, it just disappears right? If so, I don't think anyone can do anything about it. It will just be this doubt that hangs over Obama.

McCain can't be president because he didn't get the vote total to win. He's on the lawsuit too.

If B.O. couldn't be president, after the rioting was finished, a new election could be performed to again elect a president. I'd expect all political parties to hastily nominate someone. Hillary would probably be the Dems choice.

If this couldn't be performed quickly, I think the Speaker Of The House (Nancy Pelosi) would take over on Jan. 20th, until the new election could be completed. Biden would continue to be the VP. Hmmm, would that work?? What if Ron Paul won, could there be a mixed party administration?? I think the Dems would be so pissed, Hillary would get it.

You can always tell who's the Obama supporter in your office, just mention this lawsuit and they'll give you an earful. They're very easy to spot. It's the emotional response that's the clue. They almost take it personally, and I believe they feel that by questioning their candidate, you're questioning their judgement. They can't believe people would try and drag up some BS stuff like this that isn't true, in their mind. To them, Obama is on this pedestal so high, he's almost Godlike. You can't speak anything bad about him without repercussions. They start getting hostile, so yes, I do expect some rioting. The SCOTUS may feel this too, so that could be one of the reasons they decide NOT to hear the case, in an attempt to keep the peace.


FF
 
Last edited:
*IF* the case is heard, and *IF* it is found that Obama isn't eligible for
the office of Presidency, I would *really* question why the Clintons missed
this during the primaries.

It simply doesn't make sense to me.
 
*IF* the case is heard, and *IF* it is found that Obama isn't eligible for
the office of Presidency, I would *really* question why the Clintons missed
this during the primaries.

It simply doesn't make sense to me.

The guy Berg is a Hillery man. And as for the Clintons missing it - if tptb told you not to make an issue out of BHO bc would you pursue it?
 
http://www.americasright.com/

Nine Justices, Four Needed, One Conference
By the end of today, we should know whether Leo Donofrio's case will be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. As I mentioned before, the odds aren't good. Still, as soon as I hear anything from my sources in the Court and elsewhere, you'll know here in this place -- regardless of whether or not I'm limited to my Blackberry at the time.

Also, I was planning on running a question-and-answer piece with Philip Berg, but as it turns out I think it will turn out better if we wait for a few days. Thank you for understanding.

In the meantime, keep your fingers crossed that the right thing is done for our Constitution.
 
MSM covering this?

Where's the good ole folks @ NeoVision aka FOX NEWS?

You figure they would... oh way, someone else is in power, don;t want to piss them off... could lose tax breaks... or receive an IRS audit... yotta yotta
 
Seems to me this is at a point where any reasonable person has to at least ask one question - if he is a natural born citizen and there is nothing to hide, why doesn't he just show the documents instead of spending millions to fight all these legal challenges?


actually leo's case is a bit different than what is denoted above...due to barky's own admission on his website of kenya being under british rule....where his father was born....leo's case therefore has nothing to do w/barky handing over his bc.

visit leo's blog for a full discource on what this is about as it is being distorted in many other areas.

here is a quote from today:



‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “

Read that last line again.
“That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…”
That’s an admission that Great Britain “governed the status” of Barack Obama, Jr. Brack Obama has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.
And this leads to the relevant question:
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?
A natural born citizen’s status should only be governed by the United States. This is the core issue before the Supreme Court of the United States.






leo's blog: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/




also tune into plainsradio.com again tonite for the latest update leo & cort will be on again tonite.
 
From what I've read and heard, the only reason it is claimed
that he is a British subject is if he was born in Kenya. Is this
your stance as well?


### you are confusing the issue...it doesn't matter if barky was dropped from Mars--his father was born in kenya & to be a natural born citizen it must be to 2 parents who are US citizens & born on US soil.

hence why leo's case also disqualifies mccluk for running as well. the people were scammed...bottom line


I'm willing to bet that Obama was actually born in Hawaii.[/quote]

### doesn't matter


====================
from another poster:

This is a constitutional question that SCOTUS probably needs to address after December 15th. SCOTUS should immediately take up this issue to verify Obama's birth certificate. They are a check and balance on this issue. The question may come then who wins if Obama is disqualified? Does McCain assume office or does Bush get another term? Or maybe Biden becomes President. Oh doesn't that work out well for the NWO.

SCOTUS is in conference w/leo's case **today*** & his case is *not* about the bc...it's about being a natural born citizen.

as far as who wins? see above re: mccluk....& for the record this has never happened b/4 ...there is no precedent. & biden couldn't get it because barky is not yet in office.
 
They said we may not know till monday what the SC decision is (to take the case or not).
 
Wow, people really don't want a half white-half black president. He's proven over and over again that birth certificate. What's it going to take? One of you to fly there and see for yourselves personally? Even then you still won't believe he was born here. I get it with some of you guys, you don't like Obama or you just don't like the fact that he's black. It's retarded. Let his downfall be his failed policies, not more conspiracy theory crap, which is what this is and has been debunked. You people look silly and to others, racist.
 
Back
Top