Full Page Ad in the Chicago Tribune about Obama's Birth Certificate

"...We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury..."
-Declaration of Independence-

I fear that time has come. All those who are still preaching that we "talk" "retake the GOP" need to see that we no longer live in America.
 
This was quite predictable. The Justices were, imo, just plain scared of the consequences if the facts supported Obama's foreign birth. They took the easy way out by sweeping it all under the rug.

Up until now, the Kenyan government has refused to allow any records over there to be released. If, after Obama's inauguration, a Kenyan birth certificate, or other documentation, is found, this will all come back to haunt the SC.
 
Yup, the only way the high court will touch this one is if a lower court adversely rules against the one. (Or maybe not, the justices allowing the lower court to catch most of the flack.)
 
This was quite predictable. The Justices were, imo, just plain scared of the consequences if the facts supported Obama's foreign birth. They took the easy way out by sweeping it all under the rug.

Up until now, the Kenyan government has refused to allow any records over there to be released. If, after Obama's inauguration, a Kenyan birth certificate, or other documentation, is found, this will all come back to haunt the SC.

This would almost be *sweet*. Show them what jack@sses they are.


FF
 
PRESS RELEASE: 12.08.08 7:20 pm


WROTNOWSKI APPLICATION REFERRED TO FULL COURT BY JUSTICE SCALIA - DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE ON DEC 12 - SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF TO BE SUBMITTED TOMORROW
Posted in Uncategorized on December 8, 2008 by naturalborncitizen
PRESS RELEASE: 12.08.08 7:20 pm

Cort Wrotnowski’s emergency application for a stay and/or injunction as to the Electoral College meeting on Dec. 15 was today referred to the full Court by the Honorable Associate Justice Anotonin Scalia. It has been distributed for Conference of Friday December 12. The official case name is WROTNOWSKI v. BYSIEWICZ, United States Supreme Court Docket No. 08A469.

The Wrotnowski Supreme Court application was prepared by Leo Donofrio, Esq. and is centered on the same issue from Donofrio’s case which was discussed by the Supreme Court in its conference of December 5 - whether Barack Obama is not eligible to the office of President due to the fact that he was a British citizen at the time of his birth.

Tomorrow, Dec. 9 - Cort Wrotnowski will submit a supplemental brief concerning the newly discovered ineligibility of twenty-first President Chester Arthur due to his having been born as a British subject. This is relevant to the case at hand in that Justice Gray - who wrote the seminal opinion in United States v. Wong Kim Arc - was appointed by Chester Arthur.

The Wong Kim Arc case involves an important historical opinion that SCOTUS justices will certainly consider as to the Obama natural born citizen issue.

The recent discovery calls into question the motivations of both Arthur and Gray since Arthur’s father was a British subject not naturalized at the time of Chester’s birth. In fact, William Arthur was not naturalized until 1843, fourteen years after Chester was born. In the light of historical retrospection, Justice Gray’s decision in Wong Kim Arc seems tailor made to the circumstances of Arthur’s birth.

Chester Arthur was born in 1829. The 14th Amendment wasn’t ratified until 1868, and Wong Kim Arc was decided in 1898. But under United States law in 1829 it’s not clear that Arthur would have even been considered a United States citizen at the time of his birth, let alone a “natural born citizen” eligible to be President. At best, he would have been a dual citizen of Great Britain and the United States.

It was proved earlier this week, by various articles in the Brooklyn Eagle printed circa 1880, and other authorities, that when Arthur was on the campaign trail as Garfield’s running mate he lied many times about his father’s emigration record, his parents’ life in Canada before coming to the United States, and his father’s age. Chester also burned his papers and falsified his birth year. It appears now that he was doing so to conceal the POTUS eligibility issue.

Every other President (who didn’t become eligible under the Article 2, Section 1 grandfather clause) was born to American citizen parents in the United States. The fact that he was a British subject at birth was first reported on Friday Dec. 5.

It must now be questioned whether the relationship between Chester Arthur and Justice Gray was influenced by Arthur’s eligibility problems and whether those issues effected Gray’s opinion and vote in Wong Kim Arc.

It must also be considered that the integrity of Justice Gray’s SCOTUS appointment might have been called into question if Chester Arthur’s POTUS ineligibility issues had become known.

All of the above is relevant to the issue of whether Barack Obama is a natural born citizen in that the core Supreme Court opinion in Wong Kim Arc must now be re-evaluated in lieu of the fact that the Justice who wrote the opinion was appointed by Chester Arthur.

Leo Donofrio will accompany Cort Wrotnowski to Washington D.C. tomorrow and both will be available for comment at 11:00 AM on the steps of the Supreme Court. This is not a rally, protest or vigil. If the media would like to discuss this historical brief and the issues discussed above, Donofrio and Wrotnowski will be available to answer any questions thereto.

Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.

Cort Wrotnowski
 
Oooohhh, so this is not over yet, eh?

No, it's NOT over yet. Even better, the Cort Wrotnoski case uses the same arguments that the Donofrio case does, which the judges have all heard and dismissed, but they distributed this for conference AFTER discussing the Donofrio case. That tends to imply that this cases has something going for it that the Donofrio case didn't. As Leo Donofrio himself says, it has a clearer lower court record than his case did, and that by itself may be the reason things are going the way they are. As he says, if they reject that one, "then the fat lady can sing"
 
They wouldn't have looked at the second one for a full review unless they are interested in the case.

That doesn't necessarily mean an outcome one way or other. They may be looking simply for an opportunity to clarify natural born - an obama supporter might want that as well, but these were conservative judges that referred the cases up.
 
Ok, so this is a second case that the SC will decide on taking or not. And this one is saying that Obama was Not born in HI? Do I have that correct?
 
I think it would be much easier if Obama just steps down and puts Ron Paul in his place.
 
Ok, so this is a second case that the SC will decide on taking or not. And this one is saying that Obama was Not born in HI? Do I have that correct?

there are multiple cases ...the SCOTUS one for today is same as leo's barky not a "natural born citizen" leo & cort have not gotten into the HI BC. berg & others are doing that.

we'll know monday hopefully if cort's case goes to hearing...it's in conference today.
 
I think it would be much easier if Obama just steps down and puts Ron Paul in his place.


actually i posted a *wish* & what if... in the barky forum a while ago

it's logical so it probably would work tho' ;(

seeing as the DNC & GOP both highjacked the election w/ 2 false candidates...seems to me the only *fair* way to handle this would be to go to the last 2 people standing....hillery & RP.

...then we have a legal election in april...schedule 1 or 2 REAL debates where WE, The People pose the questions & then vote. no campaign . zip. nada!

course the 3rd party people would be on the ballot as well.

can't default to a 3rd party now as they still would have need 270 elector votes (& not all on all ballots) ... actually monday ought to prove pretty interesting nationwide as things stand now.
 
Back
Top