Freddie Gray severed his own spinal cord

How in dafuq did Officer Wilson get a fractured orbital bone if Brown had his hands up? I can tell you from experience that orbital bones are not an easy thing to break, and they sure as hell don't break themselves.

Have you considered the possibility of a charging brown, lunging towards officer Wilson with his arms extended towards him?

The fractured orbital bone has been disputed. But the 'hands up...' meme was proved to be total SJW manure:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-of-michael-brown/?postshare=8521426533755306
 
The fractured orbital bone has been disputed.


No, it was actually and thoroughly debunked. It was pushed by dipshits trying to sell their internet websites and believed by their audiences who had no interest in reading primary source information, such as grand jury testimonies.

Lies like this were also pushed by the (still) anonymous woman on the national call-in radio show. That was the woman with no credibility who was allowed to tell her obviously fabricated story. By the time the autopsy and grand jury testimony came out--most people had made up their minds. Mission accomplished.
 
You're overly vigilant dressing people down as Hitler sympathizers.


Dude, it's a joke using words. "Hitler books." No, you find that anywhere. Yeah, that's right; I made it up.

It's supposed to be a jab at pseudo-intellectuals who read conspiracy, white power, etc. websites and try present the information in a learned way.

Get it? :rolleyes:
 
Dude, it's a joke using words. "Hitler books." No, you find that anywhere. Yeah, that's right; I made it up.

Yes, we know. You lied. You never had any evidence of the guy having NAZI sympathies. You made it up to discredit him.

Now you lie again, pretending it was a "joke."

You are a scumbag. Now you are a scumbag on my ignore list.

Glad this is settled.

/conversation
 
I am proud to be friends with Zippy. He isn't an asshole and does nothing to try to run people off from the site.

Your ability to discern this forum's most prolific anti-liberty shill is amazing. Well done.


Yes, we know. You lied.

We?! No, there is no "we." Only you and some new poster that you vehemently defended like he was either your boyfriend or your sock puppet. Maybe both. lol



You never had any evidence of the guy having NAZI sympathies.


Show me where I said he is a Nazi sympathizer and any "evidence" I suggested.



Now you are a scumbag on my ignore list.

Glad this is settled.

/conversation


Eh, another wimp flapping his gums and his girly arms. Later on, fatback.
 
Last edited:
Whatever you say, your Imperial Wizardry.

Typical Alinsky tactic.

It's a goofball term for pseudo-intellectuals who don't even understand measures of intelligence. They take the general one-third of the measure of intelligence, discard the other two measures, and pretend that regurgitating on book learning tests represents superiority of a race.

Funny how you know very little about this. First off, I said at least more than once I really don't care about the intelligence thing, but if you think that's all race realist means you need to look into it more. Next, all the studies that these "Nazis" are citing - say that Asians and Jews are smarter on average than whites - kinda funny that people trying to advocate "White Supremacy" would repeatedly quote sources that put whites 3rd on the list.

Where didn't he defend it? He worked in jail, works in security, and has done nothing but apologize for his co-worker brethren.

I defend them against many the absurdly false notions that so many of you have developed in your heads. If they are wrong, I'll call them on it, if they are right, I'll defend them, it's called being objective, give it a try.
 
Last edited:
As Baltimore Rose Up from Below, FBI Spied from Above

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/10/30/revealed-baltimore-rose-below-fbi-spied-above

Not only did the FBI fly surveillance aircraft over the city of Baltimore during the protests following the police killing of Freddie Gray, the ACLU revealed Friday that it used advanced technology like infrared and night-vision cameras to do so.

What's more, new internal documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request show that the agency is holding on to surveillance video it recorded from the sky.

According to flight logs, evidence logs, and internal memos, the FBI helped local law enforcement watch protests between April 29 and May 3 by making 10 flights over the area, comprising a total of 36.2 hours.

In a blog post on Friday, ACLU staff attorney Nathan Freed Wessler acknowledged that "in its Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide, the FBI takes the position that no Fourth Amendment protections apply to 'aerial surveillance conducted from navigable airspace'."

However, Wessler argued, "While that is an accurate statement of Supreme Court precedent when it comes to visual observation and use of normal cameras from a plane, it fails to grapple with the effect of advances in surveillance technology."

"Use of infrared and night-vision camera technology changes the equation by raising the potential for invasions of privacy," he continued. "The capabilities of the surveillance gear matter. If the infrared camera is capable of observing information about the inside of private homes and offices, for example, the Supreme Court has already explained that the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement applies."

Friday's revelations raise additional questions about what kind of surveillance equipment the FBI was using, what data the agency gathered and saved, with whom that information is being shared, and "whether aerial surveillance has the effect of chilling First Amendment–protected speech and assembly," said Wessler, who works with the ACLU's Speech, Privacy & Technology Project.

"It also raises concerns about whether the intelligence gathered could lead to racial profiling of the protesters, who were predominantly people of color," he added.

As Ars Technica pointed out:

The records show that the FBI not only provided live video intelligence to the Baltimore police, but also collected and saved high-resolution video footage of hundreds of people participating in protests on the streets of Baltimore—footage that may be used in the future to build profiles on those people.

FBI Director James Comey told a U.S. House Judiciary Committee hearing last week that the agency also used its aircraft above Ferguson, Missouri, last year to help local law enforcement keep track of unrest on the ground.

"There undoubtedly are times when aerial surveillance is an appropriate law enforcement tool for public safety or investigative purposes," wrote Wessler.

"But it is essential that accurate information about such surveillance be available to the public, and that strict rules be in place to protect against unjustified mass surveillance or warrantless collection of private information," he said. "As the government’s technological capabilities improve, we must ensure that old legal rules from the pre-digital era are not blindly applied to newer and more powerful forms of digital surveillance."
 
Friday's revelations raise additional questions about what kind of surveillance equipment the FBI was using, what data the agency gathered and saved, with whom that information is being shared, and "whether aerial surveillance has the effect of chilling First Amendment–protected speech and assembly," said Wessler, who works with the ACLU's Speech, Privacy & Technology Project.

Classified.

Move the fuck along now.
 
Back
Top