Fox News Debate (12/15) OFFICIAL Thread

[green73]

Paul's turn! How long has it been?

 

[puppetmaster]

If you don't know the answer to that question why do you support him?

Ron cares more about ideas than winning elections. He will never change his message or back down from his ideas even if they're unpopular.

we are the ones that will win this election, not Ron Paul. it is the message of freedom, and we are the custodians. spread it far and wide

 

[szczebrzeszyn]

BTW, did they skipped Ron again?

 

[tbone717]

Paul will not lose any support from the Bachmann exchange. If anything he will gain some support. People already knew his position on Iran. He basically stated the same as he has before and he is sitting in the lead in IA now and darn close in NH. I will say though that a good solid foreign policy ad would be perfect right now.

 

[affa]

Unfortunately, you're right. Whatever chance Ron had to win Iowa is now gone. Why does he care more about being pure than winning an election? This is just sad and depressing.

see ya, dude. won't miss ya.

 

[jkob]

I changed my mind on abortion

 

[muh_roads]

Rp said nothing new - I don't understand the drama. That was always his position.

I just hate how easily influenced the sheeple who watch the media are.

 

[The Gold Standard]

LOL. He really isn't going to get another question except the one about the newsletters.

 

[robmpreston]

Sweet, just ignore Paul now after the foreign policy debate.

 

[rutgerscamdenYAL]

Guys, we need to chill out. We are so passionate because of what Dr. Paul said on National Television tonight and that's why we WILL win Iowa. Just because a large group of people booed Ron in a debate does not mean we lost Iowa. News flash, he's been booed before folks. It's absurd. There's a reason why we are doing so great in Iowa and what Ron said tonight is no different than anything he has ever said on Iowa. So, crack open a beer, relax, stay positive and let's drop a ton of money to the good Dr. tonight!

 

[musicmax]

What?? Who said anything about her being a liberal?

That's not a prerequisite for being a neocon...or are you confused about the meaning of "neocon"?

"neo" means "new", genius.

 

[Barrex]

Great so? I am stupid? I dont have brain? what is your point? He is there alone and all are attacking him, public is divided and Newt is getting cheers.....I support Ron Paul but I am not blind.

If you got argument to make, make it. My number of posts doesnt make me automaticaly wrong (it doesnt make me right either nor does make you). Low blow.

 

[green73]

politics makes me sick

 

[BUSHLIED]

Fox did their tsunami hit piece. Now Paul gets no questions.

Yeah, that was the first punch, Ron punched back, the second punch coming up next...

 

[EBounding]

"Relax guys"

 

[bluesc]

Trey you accidentally +repped me instead of -rep. In the interest of integrity could you please negate that. Thank you.

Wish I could fix that for you buddy, but "You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later." applies to neg reps, too.

 

[wgadget]

I just wish he was more clear, concise, convincing. That's all. It's a pretty logical thing to want.
He has the truth on his side, just want him to package the foreign policy answers as smoothly as he packages his federal reserve, small government answers.

49 posts?

 

[jware]

Sweet, just ignore Paul now after the foreign policy debate.

Yep! Until they ask him about the newsletters

 

[libertyfanatic]

So now Romney panders to the gun lobbyists

 

[WD-NY]

10.19 pm. Gingrich is handed the softest of soft balls on the UN and runs with it. He scores. In my view, he is beating Romney tonight. And Paul's clarity and difference on foreign policy really might resonate with Iowans.

10.14 pm. Bachmann is now simply stating as facts the wildest notions of Iran's avowed threat to attack Israel and, even more absurdly, the US. These people are paranoid beyond belief. If you want to know why I endorse Ron Paul, this exchange clinches it. Most of these Republicans would launch a far more dangerous, reckless and counter-productive war than the one against Iraq. That is a huge issue. And only one candidate will oppose it.

http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2011/12/live-blogging-the-iowa-fox-debate.html

Andrew Sullivan represents independents.. everyone in hear wanting Ron to talk tough about Iran needs is letting the the pro-war media spin you on how the MAJORITY of Americans feel.