Kinda like a drunk driver killing a family of 4.
I'm sorry. Please let me go.
30 days later, does it again...
politicians are gonna politic.....
How exactly does one "dismantle" something by merely altering it's mission?
b-b-but he seemed sincere!.....and he voted against the Amash Amendment.

But, but...we're the government! This is impossible! Collins says so!Kinda like a drunk driver killing a family of 4.
I'm sorry. Please let me go.
30 days later, does it again...
politicians are gonna politic.....

If this really starts to take hold, and really starts to make headway, I think you'll see the mask completely fall off. TPTB will throw off any last pretenses as to why all these things have been implemented.
I would love to see it happen too, if we as a nation could scrap the patriot act peacefully, I'd start to actually be optimistic about our future.
The proof is in the pudding. He seems genuine [...]
.....and he voted against the Amash Amendment.

Why the Amash Amendment Wouldn’t Have Protected You
The Amash Amendment to the defense appropriations bill took the wrong approach to an issue of national importance. I carefully read the full text of both amendments before the vote and I voted for the Pompeo Amendment because, unlike the flawed Amash Amendment, it will actually protect the content of American citizens’ phone calls. The amendment I voted for will prevent the NSA from listening to phone calls without a court order and it will protect all American citizens from being targeted by the NSA. You can see the text of both amendments here: http://culberson.house.gov/protecting-your-right-to-privacy/.
The Amash Amendment was essentially a light switch—it turned the money either fully on or fully off and did nothing to fix a flawed but vital program. The Amash Amendment would have taken us back to September 10, 2001 and made us vulnerable to terrorist attacks. That would have been unacceptable.
.....and he voted against the Amash Amendment.
Rep. Culberson doubles down and writes this:
More:
http://culberson.house.gov/why-the-amash-amendment-wouldnt-have-protected-you/
Right out of the Heritage argument
http://www.heritage.org/research/re...department-of-defense-authorization-bill?ac=1
As a matter of policy, the amendment is a blunt instrument that summarily terminates a program that the federal government, under two very different Administrations, has thought vital
.....and he voted against the Amash Amendment.