juleswin
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 14,245
I just have to reply after watching the first 2 mins of this guy. I know its always better to hear all 30mins out before commenting but since I am about to leave the apt and I usually cant stomach 30mins of anything that's not a movie or documentary, I will reply anyway just on only the 2 mins that I have watched.
I find it weird that this anti statist will buy the decisions of the grand jury that was made in secret this easily. Don't get me wrong, there is always a possibility that everything that was done in the secret was fair to both sides and at the end they found no evidence that warranted a trial. But to assume that the state conducting what could easily be considered an internal investigation with state prosecutors on one side and the state worker on the other side will not be biased against against Mike Brown is just silly.
I don't know what really happened but I would still prefer some sort of a public trial, I want to see the evidence, hear the witnesses and then decide for myself what really happened. This is not the first time a policeman have gotten off the hook via grand jury investigation for something that is so blatantly police overreaction (not saying this one is).