Ferguson decision is in -- NO INDICTMENT

The Social Justice Warrior rot has come to the Ron Paul forums.

Defending robbers and looters will crush the legitimacy out of the liberty movement.

quote-the-trouble-with-fighting-for-human-freedom-is-that-one-spends-most-of-one-s-time-defending-h-l-mencken-284862.jpg
 
geez...the owners of this site need pest control...the TEA-O-CONS are running rampant in here lately.
 
I see the looters in Furguson bullying citizens and destroying their property.

That's not the liberty movement.
 
Seems to me folks around here are calling for robbers and looters to be shot on sight. By the private property owners or their designated private security detail. I fail to see how that is equal to 'social justice rot.' Perhaps you could explain?
 
I see the looters in Furguson bullying citizens and destroying their property.

That's not the liberty movement.

Well no shiiiiitttttt. No one here is defending the looters and destroyers of innocent businesses.
 
They can provoke their way into a fat triple tap from an AR as soon as they came in my doorway. :)

same.

i don't like being effed with, especially when my property is on the line. Having the King's men baby sitting my shit doesn't sit well with me.
 


In the clip here, the wine store owner goes balls out on defense for his store, then changes his mind at the end. I'm very curious as to whether his store was one of the targets.

Does anyone know? Because, if so, I'm guessing he really regrets his decision now.
 
same.

i don't like being effed with, especially when my property is on the line. Having the King's men baby sitting my shit doesn't sit well with me.

Yeah, that's how weapons get confiscated, and completely ruined before the owner gets them back. Or piles of money that get found guilty. Or whatever inventory the see and like and happen to need.
 
you sure about that?...whats your opinion of the original Tea Party in Boston Harbor?

I have to say, I don't think that's a good comparison. The Ferguson aggression looks to be more like random rage; destroying their own neighborhoods like the morons during the Rodney King trials. The tea dumping was planned and strategic, and used to propagandize British oppression. If they were smart in Ferguson, they would have targeted government buildings.
 
I have to say, I don't think that's a good comparison. The Ferguson aggression looks to be more like random rage; destroying their own neighborhoods like the morons during the Rodney King trials. The tea dumping was planned and strategic, and used to propagandize British oppression. If they were smart in Ferguson, they would have targeted government buildings.

Hmmm...food for thought Deb....my take is, and i could be wrong, but biz brings in tax money. Take away that revenue, and local government gets stressed. How stressed is the big question.
 
The tea dumping was planned and strategic, and used to propagandize British oppression. If they were smart in Ferguson, they would have targeted government buildings.

It wasn't "government" tea. That concept didn't come about until LBJ.
 
I have to say, I don't think that's a good comparison. The Ferguson aggression looks to be more like random rage; destroying their own neighborhoods like the morons during the Rodney King trials. The tea dumping was planned and strategic, and used to propagandize British oppression. If they were smart in Ferguson, they would have targeted government buildings.

Yup, that.
 
I have to say, I don't think that's a good comparison. The Ferguson aggression looks to be more like random rage; destroying their own neighborhoods like the morons during the Rodney King trials. The tea dumping was planned and strategic, and used to propagandize British oppression. If they were smart in Ferguson, they would have targeted government buildings.

Hav eyou ever tried to target a government building? Lots of bravado and bluster here, (and on the internet in general). Everybody is always so brave, and wonderful strategists from behind their keyboards.
 
For being secret, there sure has been a lot of information made public so far. And witnesses are allowed to speak publicly.


filtered information. It has already been reported that some of the evidence will remain secret.
 
Back
Top