Fentanyl Is Smuggled for U.S. Citizens By U.S. Citizens, Not Asylum Seekers

Don't care, too busy trying to find the amount since that is what's important.

Sorry, poor attempt at humor. Your question is relevant and I doubt any figures will found on it. If it's 10 or 14% it's too much but it may be a bit of a red herring considering there are other and more important reasons to oppose socially engineered mass migration. The fentanyl problem is a disaster in it's own right but is obviously too tied to the border issue - so much so that all of the governors backing Abbott are mentioning it as a reason:

BORDER SHOWDOWN: Republican Governors Across U.S. Stand with Texas Against Feds
https://www.breitbart.com/border/20...ors-across-u-s-stand-with-texas-against-feds/
 
Found it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0EurNtLz0M&t=5232s
"73.1% are US citizens, the balance being Mexican nationalists"
"by weight, 56% are US citizens"

Dang. I eat my words. Can't believe you found that.

Every time I see a fentanyl bust that makes the news they show a bag full of pills and say it's enough to kill 200 million people. If that's true, then there's enough fentanyl going around to kill the entire planet many times over and on into the future. So, where is it all going?
 

Also from the OP article, the following last sentence makes sense:

Closing Ports Increased Fentanyl Smuggling

During the early days of the pandemic, the Trump administration drastically restricted legal travel to the United States, banning nonessential travel through land ports of entry from Mexico in particular in late‐​March 2020. Because there were fewer opportunities to traffic drugs at ports of entry, traffickers switched to trafficking more fentanyl. Because fentanyl is at least 50 times more potent per pound than heroin and other drugs**, smugglers need fewer trips to supply the same market.
 
Also from the OP article, the following last sentence makes sense:

I don't believe the "because" part and find these articles to be making a back door case for open borders. I think fentanyl is cheap and easy to manufacture, in massive quantities. Why bother growing poppies, processing the opium and refining it into heroin when China can crank out hundreds of millions of pills that are, as you point out, easier to transport and more potent.
 
I don't believe the "because" part and find these articles to be making a back door case for open borders. I think fentanyl is cheap and easy to manufacture, in massive quantities. Why bother growing poppies, processing the opium and refining it into heroin when China can crank out hundreds of millions of pills that are, as you point out, easier to transport and more potent.

PAF and his ilk. It's cluster B personality disorder bull$#@!


I don't give a flying #*%$ what you think. Attempting to professionally diagnose me on the interwebs shows your level of intellect, the lack thereof.

I provide information, whether well received or not, and it can be debated logically and civilly. IMHO, and I could be wrong, you are an attention wh0re.
 
I don't give a flying #*%$ what you think. Attempting to professionally diagnose me on the interwebs shows your level of intellect, the lack thereof.

I provide information, whether well received or not, and it can be debated logically and civilly. IMHO, and I could be wrong, you are an attention wh0re.

*cries*
 
In his poem Human Pride, Marx admits that his aim is not to improve the world, reform or revolutionize it, but simply to ruin it and enjoy it being ruined:

With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant whose fall will not stifle my ardor.
Then will I wander godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world
And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator.

+rep

Added to the "Karl Marx wrote creepy poems" thread.
 
But Boers are a yes because the values of slavers and authoritarians most closely align with your own.

Slavery? Really?

Earlier, I mentioned falsely accusing someone of falling for the left right paradigm as a distraction, but at least that is relevant to today's politics, but slavery is like, uh, so 1860s. It comes across as rather clumsy and just falls flat. Come on man. You're smarter than this. Ask PAF for an updated version of Rules for Radicals.
 
Last edited:
I find the choice of wording in the title most curious. "Asylum seekers"... who, exactly, are they? I do not for one moment believe that all the unlawful aliens are seekers of political asylum. That means the actual seekers are a subset of the total, giving rise to the question of what proportion are genuine, vis-à-vis those who have come unlawfully for other, unclear reasons. My strong suspicion is that they are a vanishingly small percentage.

That said, the wording of the title seems to be peddling something which, had the wording more closely reflected the reality, people would not be buying.

As to the problem, the solution is simple, if not quite altogether palatable from certain standpoints: decriminalize all drugs. "Oh my GOD, NO!!!" many will say, citing the horrors. Indeed it would be so... for a while. And I say allow those who would destroy themselves to do so. Is it horrible? It is, but warring against those hell-bent to engage in such matters is a fruitless endeavor, as the past fifty years of the so-called "drug war" has demonstrated in such stark and glaring terms. Those who support the prohibitions seem to come from three main camps, all of which are sadly mistaken. The one honestly believes in the wrongness of drugs and that because it is wrong, it must be prohibited. These people are opposed to liberty, much as some of them might deny it. The other are those who see no other way of saving their own from the threat of addiction and all that follows therefrom, and are hanging on to the force response like grim death. They are in a frenzy, terrified, and the more they fear the prospect, the harder they cleave to force as the solution. And of course the third group are those who profit from the trade. Decriminalization would spell the end of their profits.

Decriminalize and eat the bitter consequence of unleashing that particular liberty upon a population that is generally unprepared for it. Allow hundreds of thousands or even millions to die, no safety nets whatsoever, and clean that gene pool which has turned so deep and emerald a green. Those with basic sense will learn and our world will become a better place in the longer run, the price of our former stupidity and corruption being the lives of so many others who chose foolishly.

We've been insulated from hard, cold reality going on 100 years in terms of such personal choices and the consequences that usually follow forthwith. It is time for America and the rest of humanity in the so-called "first world" to grow the hell up and cop some responsibility for ourselves as individuals. Want to inject heroin? By all means do so, but when you OD and nobody comes to your rescue, make your peace with God and accept whatever it is that comes next. And if you survive, take what you will from the experience. Learn. Don't learn. Nobody from "government" is going to aid and abet you, nor will they toss you into a cell. You are free to live, or to destroy yourself as you please. But bear in mind that under such conditions of liberty, which must exist not in lopsided fashion, but in balanced completeness, when you bring harm to others, you will be held feet to the fire to account for what you have done, and your state of incapacitation would not be used in a court to mitigate your culpability as it tends now to be, but rather to aggravate the severity of your actions.

Liberty is the only viable solution, and liberty demands responsibility and accountability by all, upon all.

So I say let the fur fly, come what may. What we are experiencing now is living death.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
Slavery? Really?

Earlier, I mentioned falsely accusing someone of falling for the left right paradigm as a distraction, but at least that is relevant to today's politics, but slavery is like, uh, so 1860s. It comes across as rather clumsy and just falls flat. Come on man. You're smarter than this. Ask PAF for an updated version of Rules for Radicals.

Swordy thinks the common man needs to be shepherded by his betters. The America of his dreams makes slaves of all of us.
 
I just quickly scanned the article (at the link) and noticed the use of the term "asylum seekers", which is gaslighting libspeak.

I see I'm not the only one who picked up on that.

...and while I don't know the answer to this terrible problem

The only viable solution is the simplest: decriminalize it all. There will be unpleasant consequences, mostly mass overdosing, but if you think circumspectly on it, you will find that the problem is self-correcting in time.

We the glorious "people" of America have ever so studiously and steadfastly worked ourselves into the corner in which we now find ourselves. Getting out will not, CANNOT, in any way imaginable, have no associated costs. Quite the contrary, the cost shall be perforce high, not because it must be due to the nature of the circumstance, but due to the human propensity for acting as if we had no brains of which to speak. 99.99% of all human misery and misfortune comes to us by our own hands. How often do meteors fall and destroy entire cities? Earthquakes? Plagues? Vast conflagrations of a non-war cause? Very few, and yet we live in poverty, disease, addiction, graft, and broadly distributed unhappiness in spite of that $3,000.00 cell phone in our pockets and the teal BMW.

WE are the problem, and only we are the solution. It is as simple as that. We choose, and thus far the level of death and misery are not high enough to impel us as a population to put our condition on a better footing. So be it.

That joyful tirade being done, how have you been? I've not seen you post in a long while.
 
quote-when-you-have-war-whether-it-s-a-war-against-drugs-war-against-terrorism-war-overseas-ron-paul-143-67-13.jpg

Posting the right thing for what I suspect are the wrong reasons leaves things, at best, at a push.
 
I don’t embrace Left-versus-Right march-in-lock-step like you do. You're the furthest thing from a sovereign individual, so why should I be concerned about what you think?

That tone is not called for.

You do seem to embrace some form of irrationality because what you posted originally... well, that dog don't fly and that bird don't hunt.

What is it you are attempting to convey here? It is not exactly clear, especially judging by the OP. You may believe in freedom, but by the same token you may not quite have the right grasp of what that entails. But why not do a dullard such as myself a big favor and give a swing at clarification.`
 
And then PAF has, by definition, destroyed communism, the very thing he is alleged to have been promoting.

I think that's what Swordy calls 3D chess. Which must be why he checkmates himself so often.

LOL
Communism has always been globalist and opposed to nationalism, that's why they called their organizations Internationals.
PAF will have handed them and their global NGOs and global institutions like the UN the world on a silver platter.
 
Found it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0EurNtLz0M&t=5232s
"73.1% are US citizens, the balance being Mexican nationalists"
"by weight, 56% are US citizens"

Dang. I eat my words. Can't believe you found that.

Every time I see a fentanyl bust that makes the news they show a bag full of pills and say it's enough to kill 200 million people. If that's true, then there's enough fentanyl going around to kill the entire planet many times over and on into the future. So, where is it all going?

That's the same "caught at the port of entry" garbage as the OP.

It's all the stuff that comes across the wide open border that is the real vast majority of it.
 
Back
Top