Fentanyl Is Smuggled for U.S. Citizens By U.S. Citizens, Not Asylum Seekers

[RJB]

I rate this thread less than one star.

It is quite a shit show.

 

[susano]

In my first-hand experience, not to the nth degree the USA does. In fact, as a US citizen, you ought to experience all of the hoops that I go through when I arrive back into the U.S., including being held in small rooms because I have and extra grand or two in my wallet. Isn't the legal limit $10,000 on hand? Not so according to the agents.

Go ahead, I dare you. Go to Mexico, Costa Rica, Philippines, Africa, etc. and see if you are able to obtain any kind of welfare, or anything free at all. Stay for year and see if anything changes. The first stare that you'll get is "are you on drugs?". Go ahead, I dare you.

It's one thing to read/listen to the demon/repug news channels here in 'Merika in order to be obediently conditioned... it's another to actually know things first hand.

I'm not sure what you're on about the welfare benefits because I never said illegals/migrants/travelers or whoever could get them in all foreign countries. You seem to be deliberately twisting around the conversation. What I sad is that migrants get social benefits in Europe and that's crashing their systems. I said in reference to what Milton Freidman said. One or the other; open borders or welfare state, not both.

I have a friend who spent months in a few Asian countries and she had to leave after a certain period of time to renew her visa so your claim that no other country has these kinds of controls is not true. If you travel widely then you know that so why lie about it?

 

[susano]

Why? What right do you have over another? Why not let people/individuals travel freely, and if they can support themselves, good, and if they can't, either starve or move on? Do you know what the right of self-determination is?

Because we live in a welfare state, you moron. Sheesh, you're just as I said - jerking off to your fantasies that have fuck all to do with reality.

 

[susano]

I rate this thread less than one star.

Agree. Can't converse with disingenuious loons. My bad.

 

[susano]

I don't know if there's a better way to describe the position you're taking, than 'self-defeating autism.'

There it is.

/thread

 

[Anti Federalist]

Why? What right do you have over another? Why not let people/individuals travel freely, and if they can support themselves, good, and if they can't, either starve or move on? Do you know what the right of self-determination is?

Because when a teeming horde of starving invaders shows up at your door, they will kill you, your family, and take your stuff.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I rate this thread less than one star.

It is quite a shit show.

Have you ever seen an anacap/minarchist thread evolve into anything else?

 

[Anti Federalist]

H/T [MENTION=28167]Occam's Banana[/MENTION]

Migrants Fight Over NYC Shelters
https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/migrants-fight-over-nyc-shelters:6
{Actual Justice Warrior | 09 January 2024}

In this video I discuss a series of incidents that occurred in NYC at migrant shelters after the weather started getting cold. I explain how these violent incidents are due to cold weather & scarce resources but what is being overlooked is the non-migrant homeless population.

 

[RJB]

Have you ever seen an anacap/minarchist thread evolve into anything else?

It's Marxist dialectics. They hold no position other than a desire to see the western world collapse. They accuse others of what they themselves do, such as falsely accusing Bryan of falling for the left right paradigm as they mutter every leftist propaganda there is. They accuse you of dehumanizing illegals as they call you Americunts, and you can see the utter disgust they have for you that they claim that you hold for who ever the woke intersectionalists champion that day. In short, they hate you more than you can imagine and will throw every accusation at you whether they believe what they say or not. Truth, honor, freedom all that we hold dear is not what they want, but rather to see it all burn down. It even infuriates them to think that you have the audacity to want to live in a neighborhood where your kids can leave their bikes on the front lawn at night and the bikes will be there in the morning. When you realize that, you will realize there is no point in discussing anything with them.

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/LPNH/status/1750304938058465610

 

[TheCount]

The point is that any society works well when it has shared values.

It turns out that skin color and values are not the same thing.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

I just see the bigger picture. The left hand feeds the right hand which feeds the left. At that point, it doesn't matter from who or where articles come from, it is the ability to put the pieces of the puzzle together to see where it's headed.

There will always be overlap between globalist agendas, and the left-jackboot and the right-jackboot. As a person who embraces sovereign individualism, NAP, and TAXATION-THEFT, the only workable solution [that will never come about] is to stop all funding, and try to get others to understand this as well. So, to think or believe that I "support the globalist agenda" is simply wrong and absurd.

Like many and most folk, you are making mountains out of mole hills. Briefly:

I travel extensively around the world. When I enter a country (many are actually freer than the U.S.), I know that hand-outs are not there for the taking. I also know that during my 1 week, 3 month or whatever stay, that I am not capable of "changing their system of government".

Here in America, Industrial Complexes and politicians on BOTH sides of the isle feed each other's hands. People rant and cheer for their team to win; Biden the Senile, or Trump Sent by God who has racked up more debt than all presidents in history combined, and want to elect him again.

Repugs and Demons both feel like they've won by transporting human beings from the Texas border to inner cities on the tax payer dime. They both would sooner YOU be Bio-ID'd with security spy apparatus on every block, as long as they feel safe and secure from people who don't have a pot to pi$$ in. They both in recent history encourage walls, because they are entry/exit points to make it fast and easy to "process" them "legally" into OUR system, whereby they pay federal taxes which Grows the Fed and/or draw from the tax payer. This, in my experience, does not happen in foreign countries. It also restricts Private ranch/agriculture companies from who they can hire and for how much, while Bill Gates wants everybody to eat synthetic meat and bugs. Remembering, that the southern border not too long ago was a $1 Billion Per Day Industry.

If/when the American people have had enough, they would simply demand an end to the handouts, locally, state and federally. They would demand their private property to be defended/protected any way they see fit without government interference. They would demand their rights outlined in the Bill of Rights to travel freely without papers please, check points and civil asset forfeiture. The folks living at the border would ignore pleas by so-called repugs across the country who demand Eminent Domain, and go about their business as locally as they can, including telling the state to take a hike.

Regardless of who "wins" an election: It stops when the American people want it to stop. Plain and simple.

[MENTION=12430]acptulsa[/MENTION] Post #67 +Rep

Yes, we can probably agree on the evils of the false left/right establishment.

You may not agree with them on most issues, but you do agree on globalism. You want and demand that your belief be implemented globally, just as they do. You want your belief in agorism to be global, and thus allow you to move and act freely across the globe.

There could be an agorist island where your belief system is implemented completely, but that would not be enough. You would want the rest of the world to also adopt your beliefs. This is the essence of globalism. There can be no dissenters. Anywhere.

I have said it before, much of the true battle in the world today is nationalism (as defined by a limited geographical area having their own belief system) vs. globalism (where the entire globe must adopt some belief system). In that essential battle, you and the global establishment have common cause, and you gladly take up a flank and do battle for that greater war.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Have you ever seen an anacap/minarchist thread evolve into anything else?

I wouldn't even include minarchism in that. A minimal government provides for a common defense.

 

[PAF]

Yes, we can probably agree on the evils of the false left/right establishment.

You may not agree with them on most issues, but you do agree on globalism. You want and demand that your belief be implemented globally, just as they do. You want your belief in agorism to be global, and thus allow you to move and act freely across the globe.

There could be an agorist island where your belief system is implemented completely, but that would not be enough. You would want the rest of the world to also adopt your beliefs. This is the essence of globalism. There can be no dissenters. Anywhere.

I have said it before, much of the true battle in the world today is nationalism (as defined by a limited geographical area having their own belief system) vs. globalism (where the entire globe must adopt some belief system). In that essential battle, you and the global establishment have common cause, and you gladly take up a flank and do battle for that greater war.

A couple of key elements that you failed to mention are true private property rights, and voluntarism. With those in practice, you are free to do what you want on your own property, and I may or may not choose to participate outside of said private properties. The problem becomes, without those elements, anything and everything else is flat out communism. Which I will never endorse. The other problem in my eyes is that many people refuse to understand that, and in essence, they are closet communists.

Why wouldn't I promote [global] libertarian values outside of my area, or country? Is that really such a bad thing, private property and voluntarism?

 

[susano]

It turns out that skin color and values are not the same thing.

I would agree so what's your point?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Sounds a bit like wonky word-games to me.

U.S. Citizens are the best smugglers because they use legal crossing points, where 90% of drug seizures occur.

I can amend it just a bit, to show how silly it is:

U.S. Citizens are the best bank-robbers, because they only rob banks right next door to police stations, so their robberies get foiled 90% of the time.

[LOL wut? Is the author trying to make the case that people should, or shouldn't be crossing at legal entry points?]

Classic case of lies, D@#^ Lies, and statistics.

It's all the ones that don't get caught because they don't use official crossing points that matter. (Almost exclusively invaders)

 

[Swordsmyth]

What about the ones who are asylum seekers?

Or does such a thing just not exist in your world?

They don't exist.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You've known me for years.

We have communicated IRL many times.

And that's what you take away?

That I'm a commie.

Welp, that's why they call it "civil" war, I guess.

He's the commie globalist.
Only by eliminating nations and collective territorial ownership can a global communism where all property is eliminated be established, so the first step is to make believe that only personal property exists and that destroying collective territorial ownership is defending it.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Yes, you do. But apparently in your mind, only you do. The rest of us are all squatters in your 2.43-billion-acre home and need your permission before we can associate with anyone.

You can associate with anyone legally here.
You cannot give aid and comfort to an invading enemy.

 

[Swordsmyth]

No, I want to eliminate property taxes.

To do that, you need a high trust, homogenous society of people.

Diversity and mass demographic invasion destroy that, and bring about a heavy handed police state.

The proof is right in front of you, in the US from 1964 to 2024.

But, because you are so blinded by ideology, as @susano noted, you will never admit that.

Which I cannot understand, as the policies you advocate will destroy your ideology.

@PAF I can at least understand, he hates AmeriKa and the AmeriKunts that live here, and figures: "Good for them, they deserve it and everything that is coming to them".

They are not blind, their goal is to destroy what you would restore.